Study of NNZ-2566 in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury

NCT ID: NCT00805818

Last Updated: 2018-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

261 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether NNZ-2566 is safe and effective in the treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury frequently results in persistent problems with memory, attention span, mood and more complex brain functioning such as planning and organizing. There are currently no drugs available to reduce the brain damage or the persisting symptoms that result from TBI. The longer term goal of this study is to provide physicians with a safe and effective treatment for TBI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brain Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NNZ-2566

20 mg/kg intravenous bolus infusion over 10 minutes followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of 1 mg/kg/h (Cohort 1, n=20), 3 mg/kg/h (Cohort 2, n=20) or 6 mg/kg/h (Cohort 3, n=133) intravenous infusion for a total of 72 consecutive hours.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NNZ-2566

Intervention Type DRUG

Solution for intravenous infusion.

20 mg/kg intravenous bolus infusion over 10 minutes followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of 1, 3, or 6 mg/kg/h for a total of 72 consecutive hours.

Sodium Chloride (0.9%) for Injection

Intravenous bolus infusion over 10 minutes followed by a continuous intravenous infusion (Cohort 1, n=10), (Cohort 2, n=10) or (Cohort 3, n=67) intravenous infusion for a total of 72 consecutive hours.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Sodium Chloride 0.9% Injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NNZ-2566

Solution for intravenous infusion.

20 mg/kg intravenous bolus infusion over 10 minutes followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of 1, 3, or 6 mg/kg/h for a total of 72 consecutive hours.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Sodium Chloride 0.9% Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Glycyl-L-2-Methylprolyl-L-Glutamic Acid Sodium Chloride 0.9% Injection

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Non-penetrating TBI.
* Male.
* Age 18-70 years.
* Admission to hospital.
* Post resuscitation GCS 4-12.
* Have at least one reactive pupil.
* Randomization within 7 hours of injury with the ability to receive investigational product within 8 hours of injury.
* Hemodynamically stable after resuscitation (systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>100 mm Hg).
* Willing to undergo all neuropsychological and activities of daily living (ADL) testing (i.e. understand English, able to read, write, have sufficient motor dexterity and, be available for follow-up visits at 4-6 weeks and 12-14 weeks post injury).

Exclusion Criteria

* Penetrating brain injury.
* Spinal cord injury.
* Presence or known history of prior cerebral injury requiring hospitalization that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, interfere with or bias the assessment of efficacy.
* Non-traumatic brain injury.
* Known history of any medical or psychiatric disorder, or any severe concomitant disease, that in the opinion of the Investigator would interfere with or bias the assessment of efficacy. This includes the following: schizophrenia; bipolar disorder; major depressive disorder; post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); generalized anxiety disorder; attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Huntington's disease, vascular dementia, Diffuse Lewy Body Disease); stroke; brain tumor; multiple sclerosis (MS); seizure disorders; chronic pain disorder; alcoholism or substance abuse.
* Significant non-central nervous system (CNS) injuries sustained at the time of the TBI that in the opinion of the Investigator would interfere with or bias the assessment of efficacy.
* Weight \>150 kg.
* Participation in another clinical trial within the previous 4 weeks.
* Clinical state requiring greater than 6 L colloid or crystalloid fluid resuscitation prior to randomization.
* Inability to obtain informed consent from legally acceptable representative.
* Prior enrollment in this study.

* A marked baseline prolongation of corrected QT/QTc interval \>450 ms.
* History of risk factors for torsade de pointes (e.g. heart failure, hypokalemia (serum potassium at screening (\<3.0 mmol/L)or family history of long QT syndrome).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ross R Bullock, M.D., PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Miami, Lois Pope Life Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of South Alabama

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

University of Arizona

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Arrowhead Regional Medical Center

Colton, California, United States

Site Status

Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

University of California, Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

University of Miami, Lois Pope Life Center

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

The Queen's Medical Center

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Our Lady of the Lake Hospital

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Sinai Grace Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Bronson Methodist Hospital

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

SUNY Upstate Medical University

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati, Mayfield Clinic

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Miami Valley Hospital

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

St Luke's University Hospital

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Inova Fairfax Hospital

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Charleston Area Medical Center

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin, Froedtert Hospital

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lee JW. The EEG Ictal-Interictal Continuum-A Metabolic Roar But a Whimper of a Functional Outcome. Epilepsy Curr. 2019 Jul-Aug;19(4):234-236. doi: 10.1177/1535759719855968. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31198061 (View on PubMed)

Lee H, Mizrahi MA, Hartings JA, Sharma S, Pahren L, Ngwenya LB, Moseley BD, Privitera M, Tortella FC, Foreman B. Continuous Electroencephalography After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr;47(4):574-582. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003639.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30624278 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.neurenpharma.com

Click here for more information about this study

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Neu-2566-TBI-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.