Brain Imaging Study Of Rosiglitazone Efficacy And Safety In Alzheimer's Disease
NCT ID: NCT00265148
Last Updated: 2020-11-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-05-18
2008-07-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rosiglitazone
4 mg once a day for 1 month increasing to 8 mg once a day (Extended Released Tablets)
Rosiglitazone
Extended Release Tablets
Placebo
Placebo dummy to match
Placebo
Placebo dummy to match
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rosiglitazone
Extended Release Tablets
Placebo
Placebo dummy to match
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Post-menopausal females defined as menopause is defined as\>6months without menstrual period with an appropriate clinical profile, e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms. However if indicated this should be confirmed by oestradiol and FSH levels consistent with menopause (according to local laboratory ranges). Women who are on HRT treatment, and have not been confirmed as post-menopausal should be advised to use contraception.(See Appendix 4)Pre-menopausal females with a documented (medical report verification) hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment.
* Meets the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria for Alzheimer's disease, regardless of date of diagnosis relative to study entry date. (See Appendix 5) Has an Alzheimer's disease status of mild to moderate, as classified by a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 16-26 inclusive at screening.
Is aged \>/= 50 to \</= 85 years Prior and current use of medication corresponds with criteria listed in Appendix 3.
* Has the ability to comply with requirements of cognitive and other testing.
* Has a permanent caregiver who is willing to attend all visits, oversee the subject's compliance with protocol-specified procedures and study medication, and report on subject's status. (Subjects living alone or in a nursing home are not eligible).
* Has provided full written informed consent prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure; or if unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive status, provision of informed consent by cognitively intact legally acceptable representative (Where this is in accordance with local laws, regulations and ethics committee policy.) Caregiver has provided full written informed consent prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure.
Exclusion Criteria
* Has a history of or suffers from claustrophobia.
* Is unable to lie comfortably on a bed inside a PET camera with their head in the field of view for at least 60 minutes as assessed by physical examination and medical history (e.g. back pain, arthritis).
* Has a history or presence of other neurological or other medical conditions that may influence the outcome or analysis of the PET scan results. Examples of such conditions include, but are not limited to stroke, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy or space occupying lesions.
* History of Type I or Type II diabetes mellitus.
* Fasting plasma glucose level\>126mg/dL (\>7.0mmol/L) or HbA1c\>6.2%.
* History or clinical/laboratory evidence of moderate congestive heart failure defined by the New York Heart Association criteria (class I-IV)(See Appendix 6).
Ejection fraction\</=40% determined by echocardiogram, or any other abnormality on echocardiography which in the view of the investigator required further investigation or intervention, or significant abnormalities on screening ECG (in accordance with the definitions below). Significant ECG abnormalities for the purposes of this study. Detection of any of the following abnormalities renders the subject ineligible for the study: 1. ECG heart rate \<50 and \>100 bpm 2. Any previously unrecognised sustained or paroxysmal arrhythmia requiring further intervention e.g. anticoagulation, cardioversion, anti-arrhythmic agent, further investigation etc. 3. PR interval \>0.3 s, 2nd or 3rd degree heart block, symptomatic bifascicular block, trifascicular block. 4. Multifocal ventricular ectopy. 5. Ventricular bigemini or couplets, triplets etc. ECG abnormalities permitted at entry to this study. A subject will not be rendered ineligible by the presence of any of the following abnormalities: 1. AF with a heart rate \<=90 in subjects receiving appropriate anti-platelet or anticoagulant therapy. 2. 1st degree heart block (PR\<=0.3 s). 3. Subjects with a paced rhythm (further information required if subject has an implantable Cardiac Defibrillator). 4. Atrial ectopic beats. 5. Unifocal ventricular ectopic beats. 6. Left or right bundle branch block. 7. Asymptomatice bifascicular block. 8. Left ventricular hypertrophy. 9. Q waves present suggesting previous MI. 10. Repolarisation abnormalities History of new cardiovascular event within the last 6 months (i.e. intervention, percutaneous coronary intervention, vascular surgery, acute coronary syndrome \[non Q-wave myocardial infarction, Q-wave myocardial infarction, unstable angina) or significant arrhythmia; or major intervention (e.g. cardiac surgery or angiography plus stenting) scheduled.
* History or clinical laboratory evidence of cerebrovascular disease (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, haemorrhage), or diagnosis of possible, probable or definite vascular dementia in accordance with National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) criteria (See Appendix 8).
* History or evidence of any other CNS disorder that could be interpreted as a cause of dementia: e.g. structural abnormality, epilepsy, infectious or inflammatory/demyelinating CNS conditions, Parkinson's disease.
Significant peripheral oedema at the time of screening as assessed by Clinical Evaluation of Oedema and/or Signs of Congestive Heart Failure (Appendix 14)
* History of major psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder, or current depression (score on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression questions \>7, See Appendix 9).
Systolic blood pressure \>165 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \>95 mmHG whilst receiving optimal antihypertensive therapy according to local practice.
Clinically significant anaemia (i.e.haemoglobin \<11g/dL for males or \<10 g/dL for females) or presence of haemoglobinopathies which would prevent accurate assessment of HbA1c.
Renal dysfunction, defined as creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min (calculated from serum creatinine using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, See Appendix 10).
ALT, AST, total bilirubin, or alkaline phosphatase \>2.5 times the upper limit of normal laboratory range, or history of severe hepatobiliary disease (e.g. hepatitis B or C, or cirrhosis (Childs-Pugh classes B/C)) without enzyme elevation.
* Fasting triglycerides \>12mmol/L Abnormal/positive result within the past 12 months or at screening for any of the following tests: vitamin B12 (\</=200pg/mL), syphilis serology, thyroid stimulating hormone.
* History or presence of gastro-intestinal, hepatic or renal disease or other condition known to interfere with absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of drugs.
any clinically relevant abnormality, medical or psychiatric condition, which, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study.
* Has donated \>/= ml of blood within the past 2 months. Use of any other investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the screening visit.
History of alcohol abuse, or of drug abuse within the past 6 months (or has tested positive for drugs of abuse at screening).
Subject is unable (with assistance, if appropriate) to take study medication as prescribed throughout the study.
* History of non-compliance with prescribed medication, or risk of non-compliance with study medication or procedures.
Subject is an immediate family member or employee of the participating investigator or of any of the participating site staff.
Shows any neurological abnormality by MRI, which in the opinion of the Principal Investigator would introduce additional risk factors, study procedures or effect endpoint data. MRI scanning will only be conducted on subjects who satisfy all other eligibility criteria.
* History of bone marrow transplant Exhibits screening/baseline results not consistent with AD e.g. radiological findings, or results on cognitive tests.
Use of tacrine within 30 days prior to the screening visit.
50 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GSK Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
GlaxoSmithKline
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GSK Investigational Site
Litchfield Park, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Sun City, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Belmont, Massachusetts, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Durham, North Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Liverpool, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Manchester, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Swindon, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
West End, Southampton, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tzimopoulou S, Cunningham VJ, Nichols TE, Searle G, Bird NP, Mistry P, Dixon IJ, Hallett WA, Whitcher B, Brown AP, Zvartau-Hind M, Lotay N, Lai RY, Castiglia M, Jeter B, Matthews JC, Chen K, Bandy D, Reiman EM, Gold M, Rabiner EA, Matthews PM. A multi-center randomized proof-of-concept clinical trial applying [(1)(8)F]FDG-PET for evaluation of metabolic therapy with rosiglitazone XR in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;22(4):1241-56. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-100939.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Individual Participant Data Set
View DocumentDocument Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
View DocumentDocument Type: Informed Consent Form
View DocumentDocument Type: Annotated Case Report Form
View DocumentDocument Type: Dataset Specification
View DocumentDocument Type: Study Protocol
View DocumentDocument Type: Clinical Study Report
View DocumentRelated Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2005-005089-34
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
BRL-49653/461
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id