Safety and Efficacy of Piromelatine in Mild Alzheimer's Disease Patients (ReCOGNITION)

NCT ID: NCT02615002

Last Updated: 2024-07-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

371 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2019-11-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a Phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of piromelatine (5, 20, and 50 mg daily for 6 months) versus placebo to determine an effective dose based on efficacy (cognitive performance), safety, and tolerability in patients with mild dementia due to Alzheimer's Disease (AD).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with a documented history of mild dementia due to AD for at least 6 months, having a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 20 to 27 (inclusive) at Screening.

A score of 27 is allowed only if accompanied by a score of ≥ 12 in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) ADAS-cog11 portion of the ADAS-cog14 at screening, and a Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5 or 1 will be recruited and further screened for eligibility. Caregiver commitment to the study is also necessary.

At Screening (Visit 1), patients will undergo neuropsychiatric assessments, psychometric testing, and general medical assessments (including medical history, pre-existing conditions, physical examination, vital signs, and ECG). If patients have not had brain imaging with findings consistent with the diagnosis of dementia due to AD in the last 12 months, a computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan will be obtained to rule out clinically significant comorbid pathologies.

Eligible patients will start a 2-week run-in period of placebo (single-blind), followed by 26 weeks of double-blind treatment comprising administration of piromelatine or placebo, for a total treatment duration of 28 weeks. During the double-blind period, patients will be enrolled in a 1.2:1:1:1 randomization ratio to the 4 trial arms (placebo \[1.2\], and the equal piromelatine treatment arms 5, 20, and 50 mg \[1:1:1\]).

Intermediate visits will be carried out at 4 weeks (Visit 3) and 13 weeks (Visit 4) after randomization. A follow-up phone call to elicit any safety concerns will be completed 2 weeks after the last dose of study medication. Patients who discontinue before Visit 5 (Week 26) will be brought back for a termination visit.

Assuming an effect size between the treatment dose and placebo of 0.35 over 26 weeks, a significant level (α) of 0.05, and power of 88%, a sample size of 143 patients for the placebo arm and 119 patients for each of the 3 piromelatine arms is calculated. Assuming a 50% screen failure rate and allowing for 15% patient withdrawal, 1150 patients should be screened to randomly assign 575 patients, of whom it is expected that 500 will complete the study.

Piromelatine (5, 20, and 50 mg tablets) and placebo will be administered orally, once daily after a meal, before habitual bedtime, preferably between 2100h and 2300h. Patients will be required to spend at least 2 hours a day exposed to daylight.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Alzheimer's Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Piromelatine 5 mg

2 weeks of Placebo (run-in), followed by 26 weeks of 5 mg tablets once daily.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Piromelatine

Intervention Type DRUG

Piromelatine 20 mg

2 weeks of Placebo (run-in), followed by 26 weeks of 20 mg tablets once daily.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Piromelatine

Intervention Type DRUG

Piromelatine 50 mg

2 weeks of Placebo (run-in), followed by 26 weeks of 50 mg tablets once daily.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Piromelatine

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

2 weeks of Placebo (run-in), followed by 26 weeks of Placebo tablets once daily.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Piromelatine

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Neu-P11 Control

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient and caregiver are willing to take part in the entire study
* Signed informed consent from the patient and the caregiver
* Patient has a documented history either in medical records or from an informant of cognitive decline over at least 6 months
* Patient has mild probable AD as consistent with criteria established by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA).
* CT/MRI scan with finding consisting of probable AD obtained during the last 12 months before Screening
* Patient has an MMSE score of 21-26 (inclusive) at Screening
* Patient has a Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5-1 (mild dementia) at Screening
* Patients receiving prescribed drugs for treatment of AD including acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors \[eg, donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine\] should be on a stable dose for at least 3 months before Screening
* Patient has a negative drug screen (benzodiazepines or opiates) at Screening
* Female patients must have had last natural menstruation ≥ 24 months before Screening, OR being surgically sterile
* Male patients must agree to the use of effective contraception if the female partner is of childbearing potential, OR be surgically sterile

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient has an alternative cause for dementia other than AD as determined by CT or MRI scan
* Patient has evidence of any clinically significant neurodegenerative disease
* Patient has been diagnosed with the following Axis I disorders (DSM V criteria)
* Patient has a history of uncontrolled or untreated cardiovascular, endocrine, gastrointestinal, respiratory, or rheumatologic disorders within the past 5 years
* Patient has severe pain that is likely to interfere with sleep
* Continuous use of benzodiazepines or other sedative-hypnotics during the 2 weeks before Screening
* Use of any kind of melatonin/melatonin agonist during the 2 weeks before Screening
* Patient has known or suspected hypersensitivity to exogenous melatonin or melatonin receptor agonists
* Patients with an irregular lifestyle or life pattern (eg, shift workers, patients likely to be jet lagged).
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Neurim Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lon Schneider, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Territory Neurology & Research Institute

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Citrials Inc

Bellflower, California, United States

Site Status

Alliance for Research

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Renew Behavioral Health, Inc

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

ABS Health LLC

Pomona, California, United States

Site Status

Anderson Clinical Research

Redlands, California, United States

Site Status

Pacific Research Network, Inc

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Sharp Mesa Vista Clinical research

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Syrentis Clinical Research

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Research Center For Clinical Studies, Inc

Norwalk, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Pioneer Clinical research

Coconut Creek, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Miami

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

MD Clinical

Hallandale, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Life Medical Research Center

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Galiz reserach

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Biomed Research Institute

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Jewish Health Systems

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Advanced Clinical research Network

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Medical Research Group of central Florida Inc.

Orange City, Florida, United States

Site Status

The Roskamp Institute, Inc

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Infinity Clinical Research, LLC.

Sunrise, Florida, United States

Site Status

Olympian Clinical Research

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Rowe Neurology

Lenexa, Kansas, United States

Site Status

KU School of Medicine-Wichita

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lake Charles Clinical Trials, LLC

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Pharmasite Research INC

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Quest Research Institute

Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Precise Research Centers

Flowood, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Hattiesburg Clinic, P.A.

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Galen Research

Chesterfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

The Neurocognitive Institute, LLC

Mount Arlington, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Alzheimer's Research Corporation

Paterson, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Global Medical Institutes

Princeton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Neurology Specialists of Monmouth County

West Long Branch, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Dent Neurosciences Research Center, Inc

Amherst, New York, United States

Site Status

Integrative Clinical Trials, LLC

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

SPRI Clinical Trials, LLC

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Manhattan Behavioral Medicine, PLLC

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Richmond Behavioral Associates

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

SUNY Upstate Medical University

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

New Hope Clinical research

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Richard H. Weisler, M.D., P.A. & Associates

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Red river medical research Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa Clinical Research, LLC.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

The Clinical research Center LLC

Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Suburban Research Associates

Media, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Roper St. Francis Healthcare

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Shepherd Clinical Research LLC

Lewisville, Texas, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Grayline Research Center

Wichita Falls, Texas, United States

Site Status

Aspen Clinical research

Orem, Utah, United States

Site Status

Wasatch Clinical Research LLC

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Zain Research, Llc

Richland, Washington, United States

Site Status

SSM Health/Dean Medical Group

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schneider LS, Laudon M, Nir T, Caceres J, Ianniciello G, Capulli M, Zisapel N. A Polymorphism Cluster at the 2q12 locus May Predict Response to Piromelatine in Patients with Mild Alzheimer's Disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022;9(2):247-254. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.61.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35542997 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Study website

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NeuP11-AD2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of LM11A-31-BHS in Mild-moderate AD Patients
NCT03069014 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2