Safety and Efficacy of Piromelatine in Mild Alzheimer's Disease Patients (ReCOGNITION)
NCT ID: NCT02615002
Last Updated: 2024-07-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
371 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-30
2019-11-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Piromelatine 20 mg in Participants With Mild Dementia Due to Alzheimer's Disease
NCT05267535
A Study Of PF-04447943 Compared To Placebo In Subjects With Mild To Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
NCT00930059
Efficacy and Safety of T-817MA in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
NCT00663936
Safety and Efficacy of MEM 1003 Versus Placebo in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
NCT00257673
Simufilam 50 mg or 100 mg for Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
NCT05026177
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A score of 27 is allowed only if accompanied by a score of ≥ 12 in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) ADAS-cog11 portion of the ADAS-cog14 at screening, and a Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5 or 1 will be recruited and further screened for eligibility. Caregiver commitment to the study is also necessary.
At Screening (Visit 1), patients will undergo neuropsychiatric assessments, psychometric testing, and general medical assessments (including medical history, pre-existing conditions, physical examination, vital signs, and ECG). If patients have not had brain imaging with findings consistent with the diagnosis of dementia due to AD in the last 12 months, a computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan will be obtained to rule out clinically significant comorbid pathologies.
Eligible patients will start a 2-week run-in period of placebo (single-blind), followed by 26 weeks of double-blind treatment comprising administration of piromelatine or placebo, for a total treatment duration of 28 weeks. During the double-blind period, patients will be enrolled in a 1.2:1:1:1 randomization ratio to the 4 trial arms (placebo \[1.2\], and the equal piromelatine treatment arms 5, 20, and 50 mg \[1:1:1\]).
Intermediate visits will be carried out at 4 weeks (Visit 3) and 13 weeks (Visit 4) after randomization. A follow-up phone call to elicit any safety concerns will be completed 2 weeks after the last dose of study medication. Patients who discontinue before Visit 5 (Week 26) will be brought back for a termination visit.
Assuming an effect size between the treatment dose and placebo of 0.35 over 26 weeks, a significant level (α) of 0.05, and power of 88%, a sample size of 143 patients for the placebo arm and 119 patients for each of the 3 piromelatine arms is calculated. Assuming a 50% screen failure rate and allowing for 15% patient withdrawal, 1150 patients should be screened to randomly assign 575 patients, of whom it is expected that 500 will complete the study.
Piromelatine (5, 20, and 50 mg tablets) and placebo will be administered orally, once daily after a meal, before habitual bedtime, preferably between 2100h and 2300h. Patients will be required to spend at least 2 hours a day exposed to daylight.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Piromelatine 5 mg
2 weeks of Placebo (run-in), followed by 26 weeks of 5 mg tablets once daily.
Piromelatine
Piromelatine 20 mg
2 weeks of Placebo (run-in), followed by 26 weeks of 20 mg tablets once daily.
Piromelatine
Piromelatine 50 mg
2 weeks of Placebo (run-in), followed by 26 weeks of 50 mg tablets once daily.
Piromelatine
Placebo
2 weeks of Placebo (run-in), followed by 26 weeks of Placebo tablets once daily.
Placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Piromelatine
Placebo
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signed informed consent from the patient and the caregiver
* Patient has a documented history either in medical records or from an informant of cognitive decline over at least 6 months
* Patient has mild probable AD as consistent with criteria established by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA).
* CT/MRI scan with finding consisting of probable AD obtained during the last 12 months before Screening
* Patient has an MMSE score of 21-26 (inclusive) at Screening
* Patient has a Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5-1 (mild dementia) at Screening
* Patients receiving prescribed drugs for treatment of AD including acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors \[eg, donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine\] should be on a stable dose for at least 3 months before Screening
* Patient has a negative drug screen (benzodiazepines or opiates) at Screening
* Female patients must have had last natural menstruation ≥ 24 months before Screening, OR being surgically sterile
* Male patients must agree to the use of effective contraception if the female partner is of childbearing potential, OR be surgically sterile
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient has evidence of any clinically significant neurodegenerative disease
* Patient has been diagnosed with the following Axis I disorders (DSM V criteria)
* Patient has a history of uncontrolled or untreated cardiovascular, endocrine, gastrointestinal, respiratory, or rheumatologic disorders within the past 5 years
* Patient has severe pain that is likely to interfere with sleep
* Continuous use of benzodiazepines or other sedative-hypnotics during the 2 weeks before Screening
* Use of any kind of melatonin/melatonin agonist during the 2 weeks before Screening
* Patient has known or suspected hypersensitivity to exogenous melatonin or melatonin receptor agonists
* Patients with an irregular lifestyle or life pattern (eg, shift workers, patients likely to be jet lagged).
60 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Neurim Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lon Schneider, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Territory Neurology & Research Institute
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Citrials Inc
Bellflower, California, United States
Alliance for Research
Long Beach, California, United States
Renew Behavioral Health, Inc
Long Beach, California, United States
ABS Health LLC
Pomona, California, United States
Anderson Clinical Research
Redlands, California, United States
Pacific Research Network, Inc
San Diego, California, United States
Sharp Mesa Vista Clinical research
San Diego, California, United States
Syrentis Clinical Research
Santa Ana, California, United States
Research Center For Clinical Studies, Inc
Norwalk, Connecticut, United States
Pioneer Clinical research
Coconut Creek, Florida, United States
University of Miami
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
MD Clinical
Hallandale, Florida, United States
New Life Medical Research Center
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Galiz reserach
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Biomed Research Institute
Miami, Florida, United States
Miami Jewish Health Systems
Miami, Florida, United States
Advanced Clinical research Network
Miami, Florida, United States
Medical Research Group of central Florida Inc.
Orange City, Florida, United States
The Roskamp Institute, Inc
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Infinity Clinical Research, LLC.
Sunrise, Florida, United States
Olympian Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, United States
Rowe Neurology
Lenexa, Kansas, United States
KU School of Medicine-Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Lake Charles Clinical Trials, LLC
Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States
Pharmasite Research INC
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Quest Research Institute
Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States
Precise Research Centers
Flowood, Mississippi, United States
Hattiesburg Clinic, P.A.
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States
Galen Research
Chesterfield, Missouri, United States
The Neurocognitive Institute, LLC
Mount Arlington, New Jersey, United States
Alzheimer's Research Corporation
Paterson, New Jersey, United States
Global Medical Institutes
Princeton, New Jersey, United States
Neurology Specialists of Monmouth County
West Long Branch, New Jersey, United States
Dent Neurosciences Research Center, Inc
Amherst, New York, United States
Integrative Clinical Trials, LLC
Brooklyn, New York, United States
SPRI Clinical Trials, LLC
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Manhattan Behavioral Medicine, PLLC
New York, New York, United States
Richmond Behavioral Associates
Staten Island, New York, United States
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, United States
New Hope Clinical research
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Richard H. Weisler, M.D., P.A. & Associates
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Red river medical research Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Tulsa Clinical Research, LLC.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
The Clinical research Center LLC
Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States
Suburban Research Associates
Media, Pennsylvania, United States
Roper St. Francis Healthcare
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Shepherd Clinical Research LLC
Lewisville, Texas, United States
Radiant Research
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Grayline Research Center
Wichita Falls, Texas, United States
Aspen Clinical research
Orem, Utah, United States
Wasatch Clinical Research LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Zain Research, Llc
Richland, Washington, United States
SSM Health/Dean Medical Group
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schneider LS, Laudon M, Nir T, Caceres J, Ianniciello G, Capulli M, Zisapel N. A Polymorphism Cluster at the 2q12 locus May Predict Response to Piromelatine in Patients with Mild Alzheimer's Disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022;9(2):247-254. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.61.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Study website
View DocumentOther Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NeuP11-AD2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.