The Effect of Dexamethasone on the Duration of Interscalene Nerve Blocks With Ropivacaine or Bupivacaine

NCT ID: NCT00801138

Last Updated: 2017-05-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

218 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-11-30

Study Completion Date

2010-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will test the hypothesis that adding dexamethasone significantly prolongs the duration of ropivacaine and bupivacaine analgesia, and that the magnitude of the effect differs among the two local anaesthetics.. Participants will be patients undergoing shoulder surgery with an interscalene nerve block.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a double-blinded randomized study of four groups of patients undergoing shoulder surgery using interscalene nerve blocks. Participants will be randomized into one of four groups:

* Ropivacaine: 30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine plus 2 ml 0.9% saline (placebo) for interscalene block;
* Bupivacaine: 30 ml 0.5% bupivacaine plus 2 ml 0.9% saline (placebo);
* Ropivacaine and steroid: 30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexamethasone 8 mg (2 ml) mixed with the local anesthetic;
* Bupivacaine and steroid: 30 ml 0.5% bupivacaine plus dexamethasone 8 mg (2 ml) mixed with the local anesthetic.

The primary outcome is the duration of the interscalene nerve block which is time to first analgesic request after PACU discharge.

Kaplan-Meier survival density estimation and stratified Cox proportional hazard regression were used to compare groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia, Local Shoulder Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Group 1 Ropivacaine: 30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine plus 2 ml 0.9% saline for interscalene block

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

saline

Intervention Type DRUG

2 ml 0.9% saline (placebo)

ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine

Group 2

Group 2 Bupivacaine: 30 ml 0.5% bupivacaine plus 2 ml 0.9% saline

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

saline

Intervention Type DRUG

2 ml 0.9% saline (placebo)

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

30 ml 0.5% bupivacaine

Group 3

Group 3 Ropivacaine and dexamethasone: 30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine mixed with dexamethasone 8 mg (2 ml)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

dexamethasone 8 mg (2 ml)

ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine

Group 4

Group 4 Bupivacaine and steroid: 30 ml 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with dexamethasone 8 mg (2 ml).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

dexamethasone 8 mg (2 ml)

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

30 ml 0.5% bupivacaine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

saline

2 ml 0.9% saline (placebo)

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone

dexamethasone 8 mg (2 ml)

Intervention Type DRUG

ropivacaine

30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine

30 ml 0.5% bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 75 years
* Patients undergoing shoulder procedures, such as rotator cuff repair, capsular shift, shoulder arthroplasty, subacromial decompression

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindications to interscalene block (Coagulopathy, infection at the needle insertion site, moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, contralateral pneumothorax or diaphragmatic paralysis)
* Pregnancy
* Pre-existing neuropathy involving the surgical limb
* Systemic glucocorticoid treatment (for 2 weeks or more) within six months of surgery
* Chronic opioid use (greater than 30 mg oral oxycodone equivalent per day)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kenneth Cummings, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Daniel I Sessler, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The Cleveland Clinic

Ivan Parra Sanchez, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

08-647

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.