Comparing 2 Types of Pain Relief After Cesarean Delivery: Spinal Morphine and TAP Block
NCT ID: NCT00799955
Last Updated: 2013-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-10-31
2010-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TAP Catheters Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Cesarean Section
NCT01593280
Effect of Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided TAP Block on Quality of Recovery in Cesarean Delivery Patients Receiving Intrathecal Morphine
NCT07145619
Comparison of Two Types of Pain Relief After Cesarean Delivery
NCT01151943
Tap Block and Cesarean Delivery: Efficacy and Consumption of Postoperative Drugs
NCT02801968
Post Caesarean-Section Pain Control Regimens: Oral Regimen With and Without Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
NCT01982929
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The abdominal wall incision is an important contributor to pain following a cesarean delivery. The nerves supplying the anterior abdominal wall between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. By depositing local anesthetic solution between these muscles on each side, it is possible to block all these nerves and provide analgesia for the incision of the anterior abdominal wall. This is known as the transversus abdominis plane block or TAP block.
Studies have shown the TAP block to be useful for midline laparotomies for open prostatectomies, bowel resection and as rescue analgesia for abdominal surgery. There are two studies which look specifically at TAP block after cesarean delivery but none of them have compared it directly the current standard.
This study is a direct comparison of spinal morphine and TAP block. Obviously, adequate analgesia is of paramount importance to the patient and those caring for her. Studies to date indicate that the TAP block provides similar analgesia to spinal morphine in the early post-operative period. Therefore it would be a reasonable alternative for those patients who cannot have spinal morphine or who can not tolerate spinal morphine due to its side effects.
The primary objective will be to investigate whether the tranversus abdominis plane block provides equivalent analgesia post-cesarean delivery, as intrathecal morphine.
The secondary objective will be to determine whether there is a difference in post-operative abdominal scar pain, at three months post-surgery.
This study will be a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blinded study.
The study will involve two groups. Both groups will have spinal anesthesia for the surgery provided with 9-12 mg heavy bupivacaine and 10 mcg fentanyl.
1. Control group: standard care plus a placebo block.
2. Intervention group: no additional spinal medications will be given and an ultrasound-guided TAP Block will be given instead of the standard intrathecal morphine.
Standard post-cesarean analgesia and PONV orders will be resumed post-delivery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Subjects will receive 100 micrograms of spinal morphine, at the time of spinal needle insertion (standard care at BCW). At the end of the case, one of two investigators, using ultrasound, will visualize the transversus abdominis plane. A capped needle will be pushed against the skin to mimic the pressure sensation of the TAP block. The needle will not break the skin and nothing will be injected in this control group. The procedure will then be repeated on the other side. A dressing will be applied on each side to blind the subject and researcher to which group she is in.
Placebo block
100 micrograms of spinal morphine
2
No additional spinal medications will be given. At the end of the case, one of the two investigators, under sterile conditions, and using ultrasound, will visualize the tip of a blunt regional anaesthesia needle entering the transversus abdominis plane. After careful aspiration to exclude vascular puncture, 1.5mg/kg of 0. 5% ropivacaine (to maximum dose of 20 mls = 100mg on each side) will be injected, under vision, into the transversus abdominis plane, on each side. The subjects will still have spinal anesthesia of the abdomen and therefore will not feel needle insertion as sharp although most will have a sensation of pressure. A dressing will be applied over the needle's entry points.
Ultrasound-guided TAP block
1.5mg/kg of 0. 5% ropivacaine (to maximum dose of 20 mls = 100mg on each side) will be injected into the transversus abdominis plane, on each side
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Placebo block
100 micrograms of spinal morphine
Ultrasound-guided TAP block
1.5mg/kg of 0. 5% ropivacaine (to maximum dose of 20 mls = 100mg on each side) will be injected into the transversus abdominis plane, on each side
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \>28 weeks gestation
* ASA 1 and 2 classification of health
* Mothers presenting to the assessment unit with ruptured membranes or in early stages of labour for whom a vaginal birth was not planned and who are therefore in need of urgent cesarean delivery.
* Able to read and understand English,
* Only patients expected to deliver before midday will be approached for participation in the trial to facilitate post-operative data collection.
Exclusion Criteria
* ASA classification 3 or above
* Emergency cesarean delivery for fetal heart rate abnormalities
* Cesarean delivery under general anesthesia
* Maternal age \<19
* BMI \>40.
* Cesarean deliveries where a CSE is planned.
* Mothers with a history of drug allergy to morphine or to local anesthetics
* Mothers who are likely to deviate from standard postpartum analgesia protocol because of history of morphine tolerance or sensitivity.
19 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roanne Preston, MD, FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of British Columbia
Heather Loane, MBBS, B.Med.Sci
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of British Columbia
Joanne Douglas, MD, FRCPC
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of British Columbia
Simon Massey, MB BCh, MRCP, FRCA
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of British Columbia
Jessica Tyler, BSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of British Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
BC Women's Hospital Dept of Anesthesia
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H08-01726
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.