Wound Infusion vs Spinal Morphine for Post-caesarean Analgesia

NCT ID: NCT02264821

Last Updated: 2015-06-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

192 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare effective analgesia with continuous wound infiltration of ropivacaine through multi-holed catheter or with morphine 100 mcg added intrathecally to spinal anesthesia, after elective Caesarean delivery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Double blind, 3 groups

* Control group: Rachi 0,1 ml saline, Infusion 300ml saline
* Group rachi-morphine: 0,1ml =100µg morphine/300ml saline
* Group KT: 0,1 ml saline/300 ml naropin 0.2%

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Caesarean Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ropivacaine infiltration

ropivacaine 2 mg/ml bolus 15 ml continuous 10 ml/h wound infusion and intrathecal saline

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ropivacaine infiltration

Intervention Type DRUG

wound infiltration

rachi morphine

100 µg intrathecal morphine and saline infiltration

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intrathecal morphine

Intervention Type DRUG

100 µg added to the spinal anaesthesia

placebo

intrathecal saline and saline infiltration

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo in spinal anaesthesia and in wound infiltration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ropivacaine infiltration

wound infiltration

Intervention Type DRUG

intrathecal morphine

100 µg added to the spinal anaesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

placebo in spinal anaesthesia and in wound infiltration

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Naropin local anesthetic spinal morphine Nacl 0,9 %, saline solution

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18 years and more, ASA 1 or ASA 2, pregnant with at least 34 weeks of gestational age, admitted for a planned caesarian with a Pfannenstiel incision and having signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal of the patient or contra-indication to locoregional anesthesia
* Allergy to the products used
* ASA 3
* ASA 4
* Sleep apnea syndrome and/or obesity (BMI \> 35)
* Size inferior to 155cm
* existence of a language barrier
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr Madeleine Wilwerth

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Madeleine Wilwerth

Primary Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philippe Van der Linden, PhD, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

CHU Brugmann

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Apcisaal 01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.