TAE and Surgery in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Uncontrolled by Endoscopic Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00766961

Last Updated: 2020-06-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare the outcomes of trans-catheter arterial embolization (TAE) and surgery as salvage therapy of peptic ulcer bleeding after failed endoscopic therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the study is to examine the hypothesis that trans-catheter arterial embolization (TAE) is safer than and probably as effective as surgery in the control of bleeding from ulcers after failed endoscopic therapy. Patients with major arterial bleeding that cannot be stopped by endoscopic therapy will be randomly assigned to receive immediate TAE or surgery. Primary outcome will be death within 30 days of randomization. Secondary outcomes include recurrent bleeding after assigned treatment, need for additional intervention either in the form of interventional radiology or surgery, and post procedural morbidities.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TAE group

Trans-catheter arterial embolization

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Trans-catheter arterial embolization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Trans-catheter arterial embolization

Surgery group

Surgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trans-catheter arterial embolization

Trans-catheter arterial embolization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgery

Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with bleeding peptic ulcers documented during endoscopic therapy AND anyone of the following:
* Forrest I bleeding that fails to be controlled by therapy during first endoscopy
* Check endoscopy after clinical re-bleeding of Forrest I bleeding
* Forrest IIa or an initial IIb but a sizable artery unveiled upon clot elevation in a high risk ulcer defined by:
* posterior bulbar duodenal ulcer \> 2cm, or
* an angular notch / lesser curve gastric ulcer \> 5cm that fail an attempt at endoscopic therapy together with evidence of a significant bleed (hypotension with SBP \< 90mmHg, fresh hematemesis or hematochezia).

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate in trial
* No consent
* Age \< 18
* Pregnancy
* Moribund patients
* Patients with terminal malignancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Erasme University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

James Yun-wong Lau

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James YW LAU, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TAE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.