Argon Plasma Coagulation vs Hemoclipping for Bleeding Peptic Ulcers

NCT ID: NCT04366583

Last Updated: 2020-12-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

166 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-09

Study Completion Date

2016-04-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Endoscopic treatment is recommended for initial hemostasis in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the additional hemostatic efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) has not been widely investigated. We designed a randomized trial comparing APC plus injection therapy vs hemoclipping plus injection therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

【Goals and Background 】 Endoscopic treatment is recommended for initial hemostasis in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Many endoscopic devices have been demonstrated to be effective in the hemostasis of bleeding ulcers. However, the additional hemostatic efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) after endoscopic injection therapy has not been widely investigated.

【Study】 From Feb. 2012 to April 2016, consecutive patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers, characterized by active bleeding, non-bleeding visible vessels and adherent clots, were admitted to our hospital. They prospectively randomly underwent either APC therapy plus distilled water injection or Hemoclipping plus distilled water injection. Pantoprazole infusion was conducted during the fasting period after endoscopy and orally for 8 weeks to encourage ulcer healing. Episodes of rebleeding were retreated with endoscopic combination therapy. Patients who did not benefit from retreatment underwent emergency surgery or arterial embolization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bleeding Peptic Ulcer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

argon plasma coagulation hemoclipping distilled water injection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Intervention device: argon plasma coagulation ( (PSD-60/Endoplasma, Olympus Corp., Tokyo,Japan) ; hemoclipping (Olympus HX 110/610) Intervention drug: distilled water design setting: argon plasma coagulation plus distilled water injection vs hemoclipping plus distilled water
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Argon plasma coagulation plus distilled water injection

The patients in this group received Argon plasma coagulation therapy, PSD-60/Endoplasma (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), following distilled water injection at index endoscopy. Then participants were treated with intravenous pantoprazole (Pantoloc i.v., Nycomed GmbH, Singen, Germany) 40 mg every 12 hours during the first 3 days, followed by oral pantoprazole (Pantoloc, Takeda GmbH, Oranienburg, Germany) 40 mg daily until the end of56-day study period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

argon plasma coagulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Olympus electrosurgical unit/argon plasma coagulation unit (PSD-60/Endoplasma, Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan)

Hemoclipping plus distilled water injection

The patients in this group received hemoclipping (Olympus HX 110/610, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), following distilled water injection at index endoscopy. Then participants were treated with intravenous pantoprazole (Pantoloc i.v., Nycomed GmbH, Singen, Germany) 40 mg every 12 hours during the first 3 days, followed by oral pantoprazole (Pantoloc, Takeda GmbH, Oranienburg, Germany) 40 mg daily until the end of56-day study period.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

hemoclipping

Intervention Type DEVICE

clipping device (Olympus HX 110/610, Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

argon plasma coagulation

Olympus electrosurgical unit/argon plasma coagulation unit (PSD-60/Endoplasma, Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan)

Intervention Type DEVICE

hemoclipping

clipping device (Olympus HX 110/610, Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

. high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding. High-risk bleeding ulcers were defined as participants with stigmata of a bleeding visible vessels (eg, spurting, oozing), a non-bleeding visible vessels (NBVV) or adherent clot.4 A NBVV at endoscopy was defined as a raised red, red-blue or pale hemispheric vessel protruding from the ulcer bed, without active bleeding. An adherent clot was defined as an overlying blood clot that was resistant to vigorous irrigation.

Exclusion Criteria

* the presence of another possible bleeding site (eg, gastroesophageal varix, gastric cancer, reflux esophagitis)
* coexistence of actively severe ill diseases (eg, septic shock, stroke, myocardial infarction, surgical abdomen)
* treatment with an anticoagulant (eg, warfarin)
* pregnancy
* the presence of operated stomach
* refusal to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Huay-Min Wang

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wen-Chi Chen, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VGHKS12-CT1-17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id