Evaluation of Intravenous Cardene(Nicardipine)and Labetalol Use in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT00765648

Last Updated: 2015-01-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

226 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2010-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Cardene I.V. to labetalol administered intravenously for the management of hypertension in the emergency department setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

More than 3 million patients yearly receive an intravenous antihypertensive agent in the US. Despite this large number of critically ill patients treated annually, little research exists in the area of acute severe hypertension, specifically hypertensive emergency, a serious condition that contributes to morbidity and mortality.

Two agents that are commonly used to treat acute hypertensive crisis include labetalol and nicardipine. Cardene may provide benefits in titration and has shown to have lower dosage adjustments compared to labetalol. Nicardipine has also shown a decreased need for additional antihypertensives when compared to labetalol in patients with stroke in a neurological ICU.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertensive Urgency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

nicardipine intravenous

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

nicardipine intravenous

Intervention Type DRUG

nicardipine intravenous 5 mg/hour titrated every 5 minutes by 2.5 mg/hour until target systolic blood pressure range (TSBPR) is reached or maximum dose of 15 mg/hour is achieved.Following achievement of target systolic blood pressure range the infusion rate should be decreased to 3 mg/hour

2

Labetalol

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Labetalol

Intervention Type DRUG

Labetalol: bolus therapy to start at 20 mg intravenous injection over 2 minutes, may repeat 20mg, 40mg or 80mg injections every 10 minutes until target systolic blood pressure range(TSBPR)is reached or a maximum of 300 mg is injected.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

nicardipine intravenous

nicardipine intravenous 5 mg/hour titrated every 5 minutes by 2.5 mg/hour until target systolic blood pressure range (TSBPR) is reached or maximum dose of 15 mg/hour is achieved.Following achievement of target systolic blood pressure range the infusion rate should be decreased to 3 mg/hour

Intervention Type DRUG

Labetalol

Labetalol: bolus therapy to start at 20 mg intravenous injection over 2 minutes, may repeat 20mg, 40mg or 80mg injections every 10 minutes until target systolic blood pressure range(TSBPR)is reached or a maximum of 300 mg is injected.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Nicardipine hydrochloride

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or older
* Systolic blood pressure ≥180 mm Hg on 2 consecutive readings(10 minutes apart)presenting in the emergency department (ED)

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of any investigational drug within 1 month prior to emergency department (ED)
* Pregnant or breast-feeding females
* Contraindications or allergy to beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers (see FDA approved labeling for nicardipine intravenous and labetalol)
* Subjects with decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF) or with a known left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<35%
* History of stroke within 30 days
* Known liver failure
* Suspected myocardial infarction
* Suspected aortic dissection
* Suspected cocaine overdose
* Concurrently receiving other intravenous (I.V.) hypertensive medications
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

EKR Therapeutics, Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

W. Frank Peacock, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Joseph Varon, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Health Science Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Varon J, Soto-Ruiz KM, Baumann BM, Borczuk P, Cannon CM, Chandra A, Cline DM, Diercks DB, Hiestand B, Hsu A, Jois-Bilowich P, Kaminski B, Levy P, Nowak RM, Schrock JW, Peacock WF. The management of acute hypertension in patients with renal dysfunction: labetalol or nicardipine? Postgrad Med. 2014 Jul;126(4):124-30. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.07.2790.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25141250 (View on PubMed)

Cannon CM, Levy P, Baumann BM, Borczuk P, Chandra A, Cline DM, Diercks DB, Hiestand B, Hsu A, Jois P, Kaminski B, Nowak RM, Schrock JW, Varon J, Peacock WF. Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial. BMJ Open. 2013 Mar 26;3(3):e002338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002338.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23535700 (View on PubMed)

Peacock WF, Varon J, Baumann BM, Borczuk P, Cannon CM, Chandra A, Cline DM, Diercks D, Hiestand B, Hsu A, Jois-Bilowich P, Kaminski B, Levy P, Nowak RM, Schrock JW. CLUE: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of IV nicardipine versus labetalol use in the emergency department. Crit Care. 2011;15(3):R157. doi: 10.1186/cc10289. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21707983 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.