Comparison of Two Antimicrobial Therapy Duration for Spondylodiscitis
NCT ID: NCT00764114
Last Updated: 2013-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
351 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-11-30
2013-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We run a prospective multi-centric, non inferiority open label trial, randomised in two parallel groups.
The main objective is to compare the efficacy of two durations of antibiotherapy, 6 weeks versus 12 weeks, on the rate of cure in this indication.
The study concerns 400 patients more than 18 years, 70 centres in France are involved.
The duration of the study is 4 years.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Short Post-surgical Antibiotic Therapy in Spine Infections - a Prospective, Randomized, Unblinded, Non-inferiority Trial
NCT04048304
Short Against Long Antibiotic Therapy for Infected Orthopedic Sites
NCT05499481
Daptomycin > 6 mg/kg/Day as Salvage Therapy in Patients With Complex Bone and Joint Infection: Cohort Study in a Regionalreference Center
NCT03209934
Evaluation of the Antibiofilmogramme Test During Orthopaedic Device-Related Infection
NCT03263832
Or v IV Antibiotics for Infection
NCT04723940
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main objective is to compare two durations of antimicrobial therapy, 6 weeks versus 12 weeks, on the rate of cure of the bacterial spondylodiscitis. Secondary objectives are to compare, according to the duration of treatment antibiotic, 1) Rachidial pain by clinical examination and an analogical visual scale (EVA), 2) Quality of life by the score EQ-5D, 3) Treatment tolerance. 4) Risk factors for failure.
Type of the study is Prospective multi-centric, open label trial, randomised in two parallel groups with direct individual profit.
Antimicrobial therapy is chosen by the physician on charge of the patient according to the germ and to the consensual recommendations.
The study concerns 400 patients.
Inclusion criteria are : men or women more than 18 years, having a proved bacterial spondylodiscitis (not mycobacteria, not fungal nor Brucella), for which an antimicrobial therapy is needed; for the women in age to procreate use of an effective contraception with protected sexual relations and negative pregnancy test (b HCG) is necessary.
Non Inclusion criteria are: infection with no bacteriological identification or mycobacteria, fungal or brucellosis infection, presence of material or recurrence of spondylodiscitis.
Main criterion of evaluation: percentage of success in 1 year defined by the absence of infection : absence of clinical, biological and radiological signs of infection (pain, fever) ; or relapse with the same germ.
This criterion will be estimated beyond the first 6 weeks of treatment antibiotic after the introduction of the treatment and until 1 year after the stop of the treatment. The criteria of the bacteriological diagnosis will be the same.
Design of the study: patients after information consent signed are include and randomised in one arm. They are regularly follow (at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 weeks after the beginning of antimicrobial therapy, then at 6 and 12 month after the end of antimicrobial therapy) , with physical examination, biological tests and radiological acts.
The randomisation is centralized, balanced by block, stratifies by centres. (70 centres) The previous duration of the study is of 4 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
\- group A : during 6 weeks after the inclusion
antibiotic
6 or 12 weeks
2
-group B : during 12 weeks after the inclusion
antibiotic
6 or 12 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
antibiotic
6 or 12 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* proved bacterial spondylodiscitis due to pyogenic germ (no mycobacteria, no fungus or brucella), for which is decided a treatment antibiotic
* diagnosis is based on clinical,radiological and microbiological criteria
* women in age to procreate, use of an effective contraception with protected sexual relations and negative pregnancy test (b HCG).
Exclusion Criteria
* infection due to mycobacteria, brucella or fungus
* presence of material
* recurrence of spondylodiscitis
* Patient whose life expectation is 1-year-old subordinate
* pregnant or breast-feeding Woman
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Louis Bernard, PU-PH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chu Raymond Poincare
Garches, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Desoutter S, Cottier JP, Ghout I, Issartel B, Dinh A, Martin A, Carlier R, Bernard L; Duration of Treatment for Spondylodiscitis Study Group. Susceptibility Pattern of Microorganisms Isolated by Percutaneous Needle Biopsy in Nonbacteremic Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Dec;59(12):7700-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01516-15. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
Zervou FN, Zacharioudakis IM, Mylonakis E. ACP Journal Club. 6 weeks of antibiotics was noninferior to 12 weeks for clinical cure in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):JC7. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2015-162-10-007. No abstract available.
Bernard L, Dinh A, Ghout I, Simo D, Zeller V, Issartel B, Le Moing V, Belmatoug N, Lesprit P, Bru JP, Therby A, Bouhour D, Denes E, Debard A, Chirouze C, Fevre K, Dupon M, Aegerter P, Mulleman D; Duration of Treatment for Spondylodiscitis (DTS) study group. Antibiotic treatment for 6 weeks versus 12 weeks in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Mar 7;385(9971):875-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61233-2. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P050607-AOM05031
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.