Evaluation of the Unstimulated Whole Saliva Flow During and After Radiotherapy, With the Use HcT20

NCT ID: NCT00741754

Last Updated: 2009-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-06-30

Study Completion Date

2006-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this report was to evaluate the unstimulated whole saliva flow in patients with head and neck cancers during and after the exclusive radiotherapy with an association of lauryl-diethylene-glycol-ether sodium sulfate and calcium hydroxide (Hct20). This study was held at the buccal cancer center of UNESP and involved thirty one patients (n = 31) divided into two groups: Group 1 had seventeen patients (n = 17) submitted to fractioned radiation treatment in the head and neck region at the total dose of 7.000 cGy and had Hct20 during the treatment. Group 2 with fourteen patients (n = 14) started with the use of Hct20 after the end of radiotherapy. A weekly and measured collection of the index of the total non stimulated saliva flow was done on the patients of both groups. The values that were obtained were analyzed statistically through the Bartlett test, the Friedman test and the Wilcox test, to seek an evaluation of effectiveness of the medication on the prevention of the intense drop of the salivary flow during the radiotherapy and do avoid the xerostomia during the post-radiotherapeutic period. The patients from group 1 at the end of the radiotherapy kept the base index of the total non stimulated salivary flow, the ones from group 2 that used the medication association after the radiotherapy had a great improvement of total non stimulated salivary flow and the usage of the Hct20 had a better result on the index of salivary flow during the radiotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Thirty one patient were observed and treated at Oral Cancer Center - Brazil, between March 1997 and June 2006, distributed into two groups the following way: Group I composed of seventeen patients who utilized Hct20 during the period of the radiotherapy and Group II composed of fourteen patients who utilized the drug association from the radiotherapeutic treatment. The average of the patients in group I was of 58.8 and Group II 64.7 years old. In the distribution, as to sex, group I was composed by fourteen males and three females and in group II 11 male and four female.As to their color, group I presented sixteen white patients and one non-white and group II presented 12 white and two non-white. From the patients in group I, eight referred elitism, six reported social elitism and three denied it; from the patients in group II five referred elitism, two reported social elitism and seven denied it. All the patients, in both groups, presented lesions with primary site in the mouth, oropharynx or larynx with diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. The patients included in this research were carriers of oral and oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma guided for exclusive radiotherapeutic treatment.To be accepted in this study, it was established as a requirement that the fields of irradiation included in all occasions the major salivary glands, partially or totally.Patients who used medical drugs wich could interfere in the salivary flow rate, with teeth, mucositis or any other alteration of the oral mucosa after radiotherapy was excluded.Group I was composed of seventeen patients (n=17)that performed eight saliva collection, being one before the treatment (c0) and seven collection (C1to C7) during seven weeks of radiotherapy utilizing Hct20.Group II was composed of fourteen patients (n=14) Who performed nine collections, being one collection (C7) at the end of the treatment without utilizing Hct20, six collections (c8 to C13) utilizing Hct20 the first two months after radiotherapy and two collections (C14 and C15) with three and four months after radiotherapy and after suspending the use of Hct20.The total dose administered to the patients was of 7000 cGy, fractioned in doses of 200 cGy daily, with Five fractions weekly. The composition of Hct20 is 800 ml distilled water, 200 ml of lauryl-diethylene-glycol-ether sodium sulfate (0.125 g/ml) and 2 g of calcium hydroxide.The patients received a vial containing Hct20 and were oriented to perform two oral rinses daily with 10 ml.The collections of unstimulated whole saliva were weekly performed always in the same day of the week, around the same time, before breakfast, without oral hygienization, in the same office with the same illumination and silence and without the presence of companies in the period of the patient in the office.The patients expelled the unstimulated salivary secretion in a test tube calibrated in cubic millimeters with a funnel of eight centimeters of diameter adapted to it.At the end of the collections, wich lasted five minutes, were added three ml of distilled water to each sample, which was stored in a temperature of 6 degree Celsius for 24 hours in order to decrease the bubbles and the foams of the samples. The three ml added to the end of the collection were despised at the moment of the final reading.The values that were obtained were analyzed statistically through the Bartlett test, the Friedman test and the Wilcox test, to seek an evaluation of effectiveness of the medication on the prevention of the intense drop of the salivary flow during the radiotherapy and do avoid the xerostomia during the post-radiotherapeutic period. The patients from group 1 at the end of the radiotherapy kept the base index of the total non stimulated salivary flow, the ones from group 2 that used the medication association after the radiotherapy had a great improvement of total non stimulated salivary flow and the usage of the Hct20 had a better result on the index of salivary flow during the radiotherapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abnormalities, Radiation-Induced

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

I, II

compare the amount of salivary flow of the same patient at different times.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mouthrinse with HcT20

Intervention Type OTHER

Mouthrinse for 1 minute with 10ml, twice a day. During seven weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mouthrinse with HcT20

Mouthrinse for 1 minute with 10ml, twice a day. During seven weeks

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

HcT20

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* presented lesions with primary site in the mouth, oropharynx or larynx with diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma.
* the patients were edentulous
* The patients included were guided for exclusive radiotherapeutic treatment.
* To be accepted in this study, it was established as a requirement that the fields of irradiation included in all occasions the major salivary glands, partially or totally.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who used medical drugs wich could interfere in the salivary flow rate, with teeth, mucositis or any other alteration of the oral mucosa after radiotherapy was excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

82 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UPECLIN HC FM Botucatu Unesp

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dental School of University of State of São Paulo - UNESP- Araçatuba

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Éder Ricardo Biasoli

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

DdS, MsC, PhD. Professor of Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP - Araçatuba - SP - Brazil.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dental School - São Paulo State University

Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Larson DL. Long-term effects of radiation therapy in the head and neck. Clin Plast Surg. 1993 Jul;20(3):485-90.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8324987 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COB-FOA-Unesp-chrishct20

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

upeclin/FOA-Unesp-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.