Parnaparin vs Aspirin in the Treatment of Retinal Vein Occlusion

NCT ID: NCT00732927

Last Updated: 2008-08-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

67 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-07-31

Study Completion Date

2007-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second commonest retinal disease after diabetic retinopathy, and is a common cause of unilateral visual loss. There are two aims in the management of RVO: the identification of modifiable risk factors and their medical management and the recognition and management of sight-threatening complications. The management of the disease includes laser therapy and the control of systemic associated diseases. Many other treatments have been proposed but there is no evidence on their efficacy in modulating the outcome of branch or central RVO. There are currently no adequate clinical trials that have evaluated the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic agents in this setting. Antiplatelet agents are frequently used in clinical practice. Anticoagulant drugs, either heparins or coumarins, are also used in this setting as they represent the first line therapy for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Aim of this randomized controlled study is to to compare the efficacy and safety of aspirin and of a low molecular weight heparin, parnaparin, in the treatment of RVO. Study treatment is administered for 3 months. Primary end-point of the study is the incidence of functional worsening of the eye with RVO at 6 months. Secondary efficacy outcomes are the following: proportion of cases requiring laser treatment because of the extension of the ischemic lesion and/or the presence of neovascularisation and/or macular oedema, incidence of recurrent RVO objectively documented by fluorescein angiography. Safety outcomes are defined by the incidence of major and minor bleeding events.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Retinal Vein Occlusion

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

thrombosis, vein, retina

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

parnaparin, low molecular weight heparin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

parnaparin

Intervention Type DRUG

vials, 6.400 IU sc twice daily for 7 days, then once daily for a total of 3 months

2

aspirin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

aspirin

Intervention Type DRUG

tablets, 100 mg for 3 months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

parnaparin

vials, 6.400 IU sc twice daily for 7 days, then once daily for a total of 3 months

Intervention Type DRUG

aspirin

tablets, 100 mg for 3 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 85 years
* A body weight of greater than 50 Kg
* A requirement that no more than 15 days had passed between symptomatic presentation, confirmation of RVO and entry into the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Modification of the optic media transparency that could compromise the evaluation of fluorescein angiography, such as cataract or corneal degeneration
* History of major ocular surgery (with the exclusion of cataract extraction)
* Previous RVO
* Other ocular conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, could have affected macular edema or altered visual acuity during the course of the study - Contraindications to the study drugs (e.g. major bleeding or neurosurgical procedures in the previous 3 months, serum creatinine levels of greater than 2.0 mg/dL, severe liver insufficiency, platelet count \< 100,000 mm3, known active peptic gastric ulcer)
* Active malignancy
* Pregnancy
* Inability to attend for follow up or anticipated non-compliance
* Ongoing treatment with aspirin or anticoagulant drugs at the time of RVO diagnosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alfa Wassermann, Bologna, Italy

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Università degli Studi dell'Insubria

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Insubria

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Davide Imberti, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ospedale di Piacenza

Roberto Cattaneo, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ospedale di Gallarate

Walter Ageno, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Università degli Studi dell'Insubria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Of Insubria

Varese, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ageno W, Cattaneo R, Manfredi E, Chelazzi P, Venco L, Ghirarduzzi A, Cimino L, Filippucci E, Ricci AL, Romanelli D, Incorvaia C, D'Angelo S, Campana F, Molfino F, Scannapieco G, Rubbi F, Imberti D. Parnaparin versus aspirin in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion. A randomized, double blind, controlled study. Thromb Res. 2010 Feb;125(2):137-41. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.05.007. Epub 2009 May 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19477488 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FLU/OVR/001/2001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id