The Bowel Research Collaborative Data Tracking System Implementation Study
NCT ID: NCT00728975
Last Updated: 2018-11-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
533 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-06-30
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Living With Colorectal Cancer: Patient and Caregiver Experience
NCT03572101
Identification of High Risk People for Colorectal Cancer and Evaluation of a Specific Surveillance System
NCT02931825
Microbiome, Exercise Tracking Study: Among Individuals at High Risk for Colorectal Cancer
NCT02780284
Use of Alternative and Complementary Medicine by Colorectal Cancer Patients
NCT06779669
A Clinico-biological Database in Cachexia in Patients With Colon Cancer
NCT05257135
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A retrospective chart review will be carried out to include at least 30 patients to establish the current documentation standard and outcomes.
The impact of bowel care on nursing practice will be assessed.
Intervention: As a result of the assessments at all the sites and in collaboration with the site leaders, the research team will devise a common reporting and documentation system which will enable systematic collection of bowel outcomes data. It is intended that the Victoria Bowel Performance Scale will be introduced, in combination with other reporting tools specific to bowel management. The tools may vary from site to site depending on the context of care, for example an inpatient unit will have differing requirements to an outpatient clinic. However the goal is for required outcome data to be retrievable from charts from all settings in a consistent, complete and reliable way.
Evaluation: Medical and nursing staff will be surveyed in the same way as in the initial assessment (interviews, questionnaires and focus groups), to assess the performance and acceptability of the modified reporting process. A second chart review will be undertaken when at least 30 patients have passed through the service. Outcomes from the chart reviews will be communicated back to care providers in order to give them feedback as to the quality of bowel care they are providing. Any further modifications to the data tracking system will be made so that by the end of the project the system is acceptable to all sites and functioning effectively, allowing the network of collaborating sites to proceed to the next step: clinical trials of different bowel care treatments.
Demographic data recorded will be that required to determine comparability of cohorts with respect to risk for constipation and will include the following variables.
* Age
* Gender
* Palliative Performance Status (PPSv2) on admission
* Diagnosis (if cancer, which tumour type)
* Major comorbid diagnoses
* Reason for admission
* Presence or absence of abdominal cancer
* Presence or absence of ascites
* Radiotherapy during admission (if yes, to abdomen or not)
* Medications taken during admission
* Duration of admission
* Number of days on bowel protocol
* Discharge or death
The primary outcome measures for bowel function for each patient will be the proportion of days with at least one bowel movement a day, and the proportion of patients with a bowel movement at least 40 % and at least 50% of days. The secondary outcome variables of the study will be use of enemas, suppositories or lactulose, and reported cramping and/or diarrhoea. Diarrhoea will be defined as either passage of watery stool at least once a day, or more than 3 bowel movements a day. These were the same outcome variables used in the docusate study. Sites will be grouped according to type of setting (hospice, PCU, home etc). Sites with very similar patients will be combined for statistical analysis (for example the two Vancouver residential hospices to which patients are referred through a common process and assigned to according to bed availability).
Acceptability of the BPS will be assessed through a combination of questionnaires and focus groups with staff at sites which elect to pilot it after reviewing the results of the initial assessment. Their responses will be analysed using qualitative methodology. Staff will also be asked at the end of the study whether or not they would prefer to continue to use the BPS for routine clinical assessment or to revert to their previous method.
The utility of the BPS as a suitable outcome measure for clinical trials of bowel management treatments will be explored by correlating the single item BPS score with the primary and secondary outcome variables. As scoring of the BPS is essentially a composite of multiple outcome variables, (bowel movement frequency, consistency, degree of sphincter control and associated symptoms such as cramping etc.) it is anticipated that the BPS will provide at least the same outcome information as the multiple individual variables, which are rarely fully documented. We hope that the BPS will provide more patient-centred and useful information to guide laxative treatment, as the tool is centred around the individual's "normal" bowel habit, rather than relying on arbitrarily defined norms. Data from all sites will be able to be pooled for this analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Pain and Symptom Management/Palliative Care Clinic outpatients, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre,
No interventions assigned to this group
2
Pain and Symptom Management/Palliative Care Clinic outpatients, BC Cancer Agency, Centre for Southern Interior
No interventions assigned to this group
3
Pain and Symptom Management/Palliative Care Clinic outpatients, BC Cancer Agency, Fraser Valley Centre
No interventions assigned to this group
4
Pain and Symptom Management/Palliative Care Clinic outpatients, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre
No interventions assigned to this group
5
Vancouver Coastal Cottage Hospice inpatients
No interventions assigned to this group
6
Vancouver Coastal Richmond Palliative Care Program patients
No interventions assigned to this group
7
Vancouver Coastal Lions Gate Palliative Care Unit inpatients
No interventions assigned to this group
8
Providence Health St Paul's Hospital Palliative Care Unit inpatients
No interventions assigned to this group
9
Providence Health Marion Hospice inpatients
No interventions assigned to this group
10
Vancouver Island Health Authority Victoria Hospice inpatients
No interventions assigned to this group
11
Fraser Health Burnaby Hospital Tertiary Palliative Care Unit inpatients
No interventions assigned to this group
12
Fraser Health Mission Hospice inpatients
No interventions assigned to this group
13
Fraser Health Langley Hospice inpatients
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
INDUSTRY
British Columbia Cancer Agency
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pippa Hawley
Division Head of Palliative Care
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippa Dr Hawley, B.Med
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
British Columbia Cancer Agency
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
BC Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hawley P, Barwich D, Kirk L. Implementation of the victoria bowel performance scale. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Dec;42(6):946-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.02.021. Epub 2011 May 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H08-01321
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.