Comparison of Barium Enema, Computed Tomographic Colonography, and Colonoscopy in Detecting Colon Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00016029
Last Updated: 2013-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
775 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2000-08-31
2005-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: Diagnostic and screening trial to compare the effectiveness of barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy in detecting of colon cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The National CT Colonography Trial
NCT00084929
Is Barium Enema an Adequate Diagnostic Test for Patients With Positive FOBT?
NCT00619814
Computerized Tomographic Colonography Compared With Standard Diagnostic Procedures in Detecting Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT00005809
Combining Risk Factors and Faecal Immunochemical Testing in Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04490551
Exact CRC Screening Test: Stool Sample Collection Study to Support Assay Validation Testing
NCT01600209
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Compare the accuracy of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy), and colonoscopy for the detection of colonic lesions in patients with factors related to colon cancer.
* Compare the patient experience during each of these imaging tests.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
A repeat fecal occult blood test is performed. Patients then undergo an air contrast barium enema (ACBE). At 7-10 days after ACBE, patients undergo a computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) followed by a colonoscopy on the same day.
A repeat ACBE may be performed if there is a discrepancy between the initial ACBE and colonoscopy. If the repeat ACBE continues to show an abnormality, patients undergo a second colonoscopy.
Within 24 hours of completion of each test, patients fill out a questionnaire about their experience. At 5-7 days after completion of all tests, patients complete a final questionnaire comparing all 3 tests.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 2,133 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
DIAGNOSTIC
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
screening questionnaire administration
barium enema injection
computed tomography
computed tomography colonography
diagnostic colonoscopy
screening colonoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* One of the following must be present:
* At least 1 positive fecal occult blood test within the past 6 months
* Iron deficiency anemia, defined as:
* Hemoglobin less than 13 g/dL (males)
* Hemoglobin less than 12 g/dL (females)
* Ferritin less than 45 g/dL
* Episode of bright red blood per the rectum
* Family history of colon cancer or adenoma
* One first-degree relative diagnosed with colon cancer or adenoma at age 60 or under OR
* Two first-degree relatives diagnosed with colon cancer or adenoma at any age
* No active gastrointestinal hemorrhage, including any of the following:
* Reported or witnessed hematemesis
* Melenic stools
* Melenemesis
* Multiple episodes of hematochezia within the past 2 months
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
* 18 and over
Performance status:
* Not specified
Life expectancy:
* Not specified
Hematopoietic:
* See Disease Characteristics
Hepatic:
* Not specified
Renal:
* Not specified
Cardiovascular:
* No myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident within the past 6 weeks
Pulmonary:
* No respiratory failure within the past 6 weeks
Other:
* No serious medical disorder (e.g., sepsis) within the past 6 weeks
* Weight less than 300 pounds
* Willing and able to undergo endoscopic or radiologic procedures
* No need for special precautions in performing endoscopic procedures (e.g., antibiotic prophylaxis or complicated anticoagulation reversal)
* No prisoners
* Not pregnant
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
* Not specified
Chemotherapy:
* Not specified
Endocrine therapy:
* Not specified
Radiotherapy:
* Not specified
Surgery:
* Not specified
Other:
* No other concurrent clinical trial participation involving drugs, medical devices, and/or biologics
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Don Rockey, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Duke Cancer Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rebecca and John Moores UCSD Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
California Pacific Medical Center - Pacific Campus
San Francisco, California, United States
California Pacific Medical Center - California Campus
San Francisco, California, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Indian River Radiology
Vero Beach, Florida, United States
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Troy Internal Medicine, P.C.
Troy, Michigan, United States
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
NYU School of Medicine's Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Durham
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Simmons Cancer Center - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, United States
Massey Cancer Center
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DUMC-000866-00-5R
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
DUMC-CA14326
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NCI-V01-1655
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000068587
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
0866
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.