Screening for Colorectal Cancer With FOBT, Virtual Colonoscopy and Optical Colonoscopy. A Randomized Clinical Trial in the Florence District

NCT ID: NCT01651624

Last Updated: 2018-11-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16087 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-31

Study Completion Date

2018-11-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) has proven to be accurate in detecting colorectal neoplasms and may be a primary test in colorectal cancer screening.

PURPOSE: This clinical trial will compare participation rate, diagnostic yield and costs of computed tomographic colonography, faecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy (CO) as a primary screening test in a population-based programme.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary objectives:

* To compare the participation rate to faecal occult blood test (FOBT), computed tomographic colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy (CO) as a primary screening test in a population-based programme for colorectal cancer.
* To compare the participation rate to CTC with reduced cathartic preparation versus CTC with standard bowel preparation.
* To compare the detection rate for cancer or advanced adenomas of CTC with computer aided diagnosis (CAD) versus three rounds of FOBT every second year.
* To evaluate referral rate for colonoscopy induced by primary CTC versus three rounds of FOBT every second year.
* To compare costs of the three screening strategies.

Secondary objectives:

* To compare the expected and perceived discomfort of colonoscopy and computed tomographic colonography as assessed with a structured questionnaire.
* To evaluate the rate of complications in each group.
* To validate a teleradiology model for computed tomographic colonography.
* To create a biological bank of blood and stool specimens from subjects who undergo computed tomographic colonography, primary colonoscopy and second level colonoscopy.

DESIGN:

14,000 subjects aged 55-64 years, living in the Florence District and never screened for colorectal cancer, will be randomized in 3 arms:

* group 1 (5,000 persons) invited to CTC (divided into: subgroup 1A with reduced cathartic preparation and subgroup 1B with standard bowel preparation);
* group 2 (8,000 persons) invited to biannual FOBT for 3 rounds;
* group 3 (1,000 persons) invited to CO.

Subjects of each group will be invited by mail to undergo the selected test. Individuals of each group will receive an invitation letter and an information leaflet, containing information about colorectal cancer, importance of screening, and advantages and possible risks of the selected test.

Invitation letter for the FOBT group contains instructions on how to pick-up the kit test at the nearest pharmacy. The FOBT screening test adopted is OC-SENSOR DIANA (Eiken Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan), a quantitative, completely automated immunochemical test, based on latex agglutination. Positivity threshold is set at 100 ng/ml of sample solution. Invited subjects are asked to collect a single sample of faeces, without dietary restrictions. Sample are retuned according to the routine procedure of Florence screening programme.

Invitation letter for CTC and colonoscopy contains a phone number and an email address of the screening centre. All invitees have the option to call or send an email to the screening centre in order to receive an appointment for a prior consultation. All non-responders will receive a remainder by mail after three months. Non-responders to reminder will be invited to FOBT according with current screening procedure.

Subjects who accept invitation for CTC or CO will have a consultation at the screening centre with a trained nurse. During the consultation subjects will be informed about the study protocol, the screening examination to which they are invited, the bowel preparation, and the management in case of positive results. All subjects tested positive to FOBT or CTC (mass or at least one polyp ≥ 6 mm) will be invited to undergo total colonoscopy. Then, subjects will be scheduled for the selected examination (CTC or CO).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), reduced prep

Subjects invited to undergo CTC with reduced cathartic preparation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Invitation to screening

Intervention Type OTHER

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), standard prep

Subjects invited to undergo CTC with standard bowel preparation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Invitation to screening

Intervention Type OTHER

Faecal occult blood test (FOBT)

Subjects invited to undergo FOBT

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Invitation to screening

Intervention Type OTHER

Colonoscopy

Subjects invited to undergo colonoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Invitation to screening

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Invitation to screening

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Never invited to previous colorectal cancer screening.

Exclusion Criteria

* Personal history of colorectal cancer or colonic advanced adenomas.
* Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
* Previous five years complete colonoscopy or previous two years faecal occult blood test (FOBT).
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Florence

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefano Milani, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florence

Grazia Grazzini, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, ISPO

Florence, FI, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sali L, Ventura L, Mascalchi M, Falchini M, Mallardi B, Carozzi F, Milani S, Zappa M, Grazzini G, Mantellini P. Single CT colonography versus three rounds of faecal immunochemical test for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (SAVE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;7(11):1016-1023. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00269-2. Epub 2022 Sep 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36116454 (View on PubMed)

Sali L, Grazzini G, Carozzi F, Castiglione G, Falchini M, Mallardi B, Mantellini P, Ventura L, Regge D, Zappa M, Mascalchi M, Milani S. Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study). Trials. 2013 Mar 15;14:74. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-74.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23497601 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

432/10

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

D65C09002710007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.