Screening for Colorectal Cancer With FOBT, Virtual Colonoscopy and Optical Colonoscopy. A Randomized Clinical Trial in the Florence District
NCT ID: NCT01651624
Last Updated: 2018-11-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16087 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-12-31
2018-11-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This clinical trial will compare participation rate, diagnostic yield and costs of computed tomographic colonography, faecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy (CO) as a primary screening test in a population-based programme.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Participation to Colorectal Cancer Screening With Fecal Occult Blood Test and Colonoscopy
NCT00812942
Comparison of Hemoccult, Magstream and OC-Sensor Faecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT01251666
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-risk Population: Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing Versus Colonoscopy
NCT00906997
Colonoscopy or Fecal Occult Blood Test in Screening Healthy Participants for Colorectal Cancer
NCT00102011
Maximizing Yield of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT01634126
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary objectives:
* To compare the participation rate to faecal occult blood test (FOBT), computed tomographic colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy (CO) as a primary screening test in a population-based programme for colorectal cancer.
* To compare the participation rate to CTC with reduced cathartic preparation versus CTC with standard bowel preparation.
* To compare the detection rate for cancer or advanced adenomas of CTC with computer aided diagnosis (CAD) versus three rounds of FOBT every second year.
* To evaluate referral rate for colonoscopy induced by primary CTC versus three rounds of FOBT every second year.
* To compare costs of the three screening strategies.
Secondary objectives:
* To compare the expected and perceived discomfort of colonoscopy and computed tomographic colonography as assessed with a structured questionnaire.
* To evaluate the rate of complications in each group.
* To validate a teleradiology model for computed tomographic colonography.
* To create a biological bank of blood and stool specimens from subjects who undergo computed tomographic colonography, primary colonoscopy and second level colonoscopy.
DESIGN:
14,000 subjects aged 55-64 years, living in the Florence District and never screened for colorectal cancer, will be randomized in 3 arms:
* group 1 (5,000 persons) invited to CTC (divided into: subgroup 1A with reduced cathartic preparation and subgroup 1B with standard bowel preparation);
* group 2 (8,000 persons) invited to biannual FOBT for 3 rounds;
* group 3 (1,000 persons) invited to CO.
Subjects of each group will be invited by mail to undergo the selected test. Individuals of each group will receive an invitation letter and an information leaflet, containing information about colorectal cancer, importance of screening, and advantages and possible risks of the selected test.
Invitation letter for the FOBT group contains instructions on how to pick-up the kit test at the nearest pharmacy. The FOBT screening test adopted is OC-SENSOR DIANA (Eiken Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan), a quantitative, completely automated immunochemical test, based on latex agglutination. Positivity threshold is set at 100 ng/ml of sample solution. Invited subjects are asked to collect a single sample of faeces, without dietary restrictions. Sample are retuned according to the routine procedure of Florence screening programme.
Invitation letter for CTC and colonoscopy contains a phone number and an email address of the screening centre. All invitees have the option to call or send an email to the screening centre in order to receive an appointment for a prior consultation. All non-responders will receive a remainder by mail after three months. Non-responders to reminder will be invited to FOBT according with current screening procedure.
Subjects who accept invitation for CTC or CO will have a consultation at the screening centre with a trained nurse. During the consultation subjects will be informed about the study protocol, the screening examination to which they are invited, the bowel preparation, and the management in case of positive results. All subjects tested positive to FOBT or CTC (mass or at least one polyp ≥ 6 mm) will be invited to undergo total colonoscopy. Then, subjects will be scheduled for the selected examination (CTC or CO).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), reduced prep
Subjects invited to undergo CTC with reduced cathartic preparation
Invitation to screening
Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), standard prep
Subjects invited to undergo CTC with standard bowel preparation
Invitation to screening
Faecal occult blood test (FOBT)
Subjects invited to undergo FOBT
Invitation to screening
Colonoscopy
Subjects invited to undergo colonoscopy
Invitation to screening
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Invitation to screening
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
* Previous five years complete colonoscopy or previous two years faecal occult blood test (FOBT).
55 Years
64 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Florence
OTHER
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefano Milani, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Florence
Grazia Grazzini, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, ISPO
Florence, FI, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sali L, Ventura L, Mascalchi M, Falchini M, Mallardi B, Carozzi F, Milani S, Zappa M, Grazzini G, Mantellini P. Single CT colonography versus three rounds of faecal immunochemical test for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (SAVE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;7(11):1016-1023. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00269-2. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
Sali L, Grazzini G, Carozzi F, Castiglione G, Falchini M, Mallardi B, Mantellini P, Ventura L, Regge D, Zappa M, Mascalchi M, Milani S. Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study). Trials. 2013 Mar 15;14:74. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-74.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
432/10
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
D65C09002710007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.