Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
148 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-07-31
2010-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dietary Intervention in Food Allergy
NCT06386081
Endophenotyping for Plant-based Food Allergy Diagnosis, Tolerance Biomarkers, and Mechanisms in Microneedle Immunotherapy
NCT06997432
The Effect of Per Oral Immunotherapy in Severe Milk, Peanut and Egg Allergy in Adults
NCT03361072
Microbiota and Allergy
NCT04750980
Tolerance Following Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
NCT01750879
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All the patients will be submitted to: complete clinical investigation; skin prick test with a panel of common food/inhalant commercial extracts; skin tests by the "prick + prick" method with fresh fruits and vegetables; skin prick test with purified peach LTP (Pru p 3) The sera of the patients will be used for: immunoblotting with peach extract and immunoblotting inhibition with purified natural Pru p 3 and, if possible, recombinant Pru p 3, Pru p 1 and Pru p 4, using a pool of selected sera; CAP system with a predetermined panel of fruit and vegetable allergens; CAP system with recombinant allergens of peach and birch pollen: Pru p 3, Pru p 1 and Pru p 4 for peach, Bet v 1, Bet v 2 and Bet v 4 for birch pollen. Finally, a statistical analysis will be carried out in order to verify if the two groups of patients will show significant differences in the allergens recognized. The results of this study will be a property of the Unit of Allergology and Immunology as stated by DM 17/2004 and will be presented as written publication or oral presentation at National and/or International Congresses of Allergy and Immunology, quoting the PHADIA company
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
Subjects with mild (S1) reaction to peach fruit
No interventions assigned to this group
B
Subjects with severe reaction to peach fruit
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* pts with 18 e 80 years old;
* signature of the informed consent form;
* CAP/RAST positive for peach;
* clinical manifestation of peach allergy
Exclusion Criteria
* current antihistamine therapy;
* subjects that do not give consent to the study
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Niguarda Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elide A Patorello, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Niguarda Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Niguarda Hospital
Milan, Italy, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pastorello EA, Farioli L, Pravettoni V, Scibilia J, Mascheri A, Borgonovo L, Piantanida M, Primavesi L, Stafylaraki C, Pasqualetti S, Schroeder J, Nichelatti M, Marocchi A. Pru p 3-sensitised Italian peach-allergic patients are less likely to develop severe symptoms when also presenting IgE antibodies to Pru p 1 and Pru p 4. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011;156(4):362-72. doi: 10.1159/000324440. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
Mascheri A, Farioli L, Pravettoni V, Piantanida M, Stafylaraki C, Scibilia J, Mirone C, Preziosi D, Nichelatti M, Pastorello EA. Hypersensitivity to Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) in Peach-Allergic Patients: rPrup 3 and rPrup 1 Are Predictive of Symptom Severity. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2015;25(3):183-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Peach allergy
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.