Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
187 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2014-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Quality of Life of Mothers of Children With Food Allergy
NCT04740632
The Feasibility of Systemic Reaction After Contact Exposure to the Allergenic Food in Children With Known Food Allergy
NCT05080127
Longitudinal Follow-up Study for Food Allergies
NCT03234764
Allergy Experience Study
NCT03513965
FARE Peanut SLIT and Early Tolerance Induction
NCT02304991
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Why intervene with food service workers? Both food allergies and allergenic foods are common, as is eating, making accidental ingestion of allergenic foods almost inevitable. Risks may be particularly pronounced in out-of-home contexts (restaurants, school cafeterias, etc.), where the food allergic person must rely on service workers to assure their safety. Therefore, food service workers are important partners in the prevention of adverse events.
Design: Within the context of a survey of food service workers, investigators embedded a randomized experiment. In this experiment, investigators randomly assigned survey participants to one of two conditions: a Personalized vs. Depersonalized Chef Card. Depersonalized Chef Cards included simple written instructions regarding the patron's specific food allergies, including explicit guidance regarding foods to be avoided and information regarding the seriousness of the allergy. Personalized Chef Cards included identical written instructions and information, as well as a photograph of a patron with food allergies.
Hypothesis: Service workers exposed to the Personalized (compared to Depersonalized) Chef Cards will demonstrate greater empathy, sympathy, willingness to help, and vigilance regarding food allergies and their management.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention (personalized chef card)
Restaurant employees received a personalized chef card, which included written information about a patron's food allergies and a photograph of the patron.
Photograph
Add a photograph to a chef card.
Control (depersonalized chef card)
Restaurant employees received a depersonalized chef card, which included written information about a patron's food allergies, without a photograph of a patron.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Photograph
Add a photograph to a chef card.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Speaks English
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carolyn Cannuscio
Assistant Professor of Family Medicine and Community Health
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carolyn C Cannuscio, ScD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dupuis R, Meisel Z, Grande D, Strupp E, Kounaves S, Graves A, Frasso R, Cannuscio CC. Food allergy management among restaurant workers in a large U.S. city. Food control 63:147-57, 2016.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
818836
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.