Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin Compared to Glipizide in Elderly Diabetics

NCT ID: NCT00707993

Last Updated: 2013-05-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

441 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin, once daily (QD), compared to glipizide in elderly diabetic patients who have not received treatment or are on a single oral medication.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Type 2 diabetes is among the most common chronic condition in adults 65 years of age or older. A recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey reported that more than 20% of adults aged 65 years or older have diabetes. These individuals are often under-treated with respect to glucose-lowering medications, and their care is complicated by the extent of their clinical and functional status. Age-related changes in physiology, diabetes-associated illnesses and other illnesses (such as renal, cardiac, and hepatic insufficiency), as well as use of multiple medications make standard oral anti-hyperglycemic therapy and insulin use problematic. In addition, hypoglycemia is more common and severe in older rather than younger patients taking oral antidiabetic drugs which can precipitate serious events such as falls and hip fractures. While avoidance of hypoglycemia is paramount in elderly diabetic patients, many commonly used medications are associated with a substantial risk for hypoglycemia. New classes of drug which avoid such complications in the elderly population are of increasing interest as this population continues to expand.

Takeda is developing SYR-322 (alogliptin) for the improvement of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Alogliptin is an inhibitor of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV enzyme. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV is thought to be primarily responsible for the degradation of 2 peptide hormones released in response to nutrient ingestion. It is expected that inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV will improve glycemic (glucose) control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

This study will compare the effectiveness and safety of alogliptin with that of glipizide (a commonly used diabetes medication) in adults who are 65 to 90 years of age with Type 2 diabetes. Individuals who participate in this study will either have failed diet and exercise therapy alone during the 2 months before Screening, or will have been receiving a single oral antidiabetic medication without obtaining good blood glucose (sugar) control.

Each participant will be required to commit to screening visits. Study participation is anticipated to be up to 59 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Alogliptin 25 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and glipizide placebo matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 52 weeks.

Glipizide 5 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Glipizide

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and glipizide 5 mg to 10 mg, tablets, orally, once daily up to 52 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alogliptin

Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and glipizide placebo matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 52 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Glipizide

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and glipizide 5 mg to 10 mg, tablets, orally, once daily up to 52 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SYR110322 SYR-322 Glucotrol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Has a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with either:

* Failed diet and exercise therapy alone as demonstrated by inadequate glycemic control while receiving no antidiabetic treatment within the two months prior to Screening, or
* Failed treatment with oral monotherapy alone (may include treatment with two or more antidiabetic agents if for less than 7 days) as demonstrated by inadequate glycemic control within the two months prior to Screening.
* Body mass index greater than or equal to 23 kg/m2 and less than or equal to 45 kg/m2.
* If regularly using other, non-excluded medications, must be on a stable dose for at least the 4 weeks prior to Screening.
* Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use a medically accepted means of contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
* Able and willing to monitor their own blood glucose concentrations with a home glucose monitor.
* No major illness or debility that in the investigator's opinion prohibits the participant from completing the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg and/or diastolic pressure greater than or equal to 100 mm Hg.
* Hemoglobin less than or equal to 12 g/dL for males or less than or equal to 10 g/dL for females.
* Alanine aminotransferase greater than or equal to 3 times the upper limit of normal.
* Calculated creatinine clearance less than or equal to 50 mL/min.
* Thyroid-stimulating hormone level outside of the normal range.
* History of cancer, other than squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, that has not been in full remission for at least 5 years prior to Screening.
* History of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within the 6 months prior to Screening.
* History of treated diabetic gastroparesis, gastric banding, or gastric bypass surgery.
* New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure regardless of therapy.
* History of coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction within the 6 months prior to Screening.
* History of any hemoglobinopathy that may affect determination of glycosylated hemoglobin.
* History of infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus.
* History of a psychiatric disorder that will affect the participant's ability to participate in the study.
* History of angioedema in association with use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors.
* History of alcohol or substance abuse within the 2 years prior to Screening.
* History of treatment with any weight-loss drugs or oral or systemically injected glucocorticoids within the 3 months prior to Screening.
* Receipt of any investigational drug within the 30 days prior to Screening.
* Prior treatment in an investigational study of alogliptin.
* Clinically significant medical abnormality or disease or clinically significant abnormal findings at Screening (other than type 2 diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, should exclude the participant from the study.
* Has donated more than 400 mL of blood within the 90 days preceding their participation in the study.
* Has hypersensitivity or has had an anaphylactic reaction(s) to any DPP-4 inhibitor drug.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

VP Biological Sciences

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alexander City, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Foothill Ranch, California, United States

Site Status

Huntington Park, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Redlands, California, United States

Site Status

Prospect, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Illinois, United States

Site Status

La Porte, Indiana, United States

Site Status

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Clarkston, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Hamilton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Westlake, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Zanesville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Aiken, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Taylors, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tomball, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Miskoic, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Karnāl, Haryana, India

Site Status

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Belagavi, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Mumbai, Maharashrta, India

Site Status

Ashkelon, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Nahariya, , Israel

Site Status

Rishon LeZiyyon, , Israel

Site Status

Safed, , Israel

Site Status

Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico

Site Status

Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico

Site Status

Durango, Durango, Mexico

Site Status

Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico

Site Status

Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Nezahualcóyotl, , Mexico

Site Status

Arequipa, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Piura, , Peru

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Galati, , Romania

Site Status

Satu Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Irkutsk, , Russia

Site Status

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Centurion, , South Africa

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Port Elizabeth, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Hungary India Israel Mexico Peru Poland Romania Russia South Africa Ukraine

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-000959-10

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1112-7905

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SYR-322_303

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.