Induced Diuresis With Matched Hydration Compared to Standard Hydration for Contrast Induced Nephropathy (CIN) Prevention
NCT ID: NCT00702728
Last Updated: 2009-10-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-06-30
2009-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy of Low Dose Hypertonic Saline Solution and High Dose Furosemide for Congestive Heart Failure
NCT01028170
Natriuresis-Guided Diuretic Therapy in Patients With Acute Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT06203236
Early Sequential Nephron Blockade in Acute Heart Failure Patients: A Randomised, Controlled Study
NCT04465123
Loop Diuretics in Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT00478543
Quantifying Congestion by Ultrasound
NCT05090137
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although the exact mechanisms remain unknown, intravenous hydration before the catheterization procedure is the only current treatment that has been shown to reduce the incidence of CIN. However, in patients with baseline impairments in renal function, hydration is commonly performed at a rate significantly lower than that shown to provide protection due to the fear of overhydration and pulmonary edema. Previous studies have used diuretics to increase urine output and prevent overhydration. In addition to the benefit of increased urine flow, loop diuretics, such as furosemide, should be expected to provide additive benefit against another potential mechanism of CIN, medullary ischemia, as they reduce sodium reabsorption, and consequentially oxygen consumption, of the kidney. While the results of their use have been mixed, it appears that furosemide was deleterious in patients who became dehydrated, i.e. those in whom the urine output was substantially greater than the rate of hydration they received.
This problem may be overcome by a device, which is now available on the market, called the RenalGuard System. The System is capable of delivering saline solution to a patient in an amount matched to the volume of urine produced by the patient. The purpose of this matched fluid replacement is to prevent hypovolemia that may lead to hypotension or fluid overload.The aim of the study is to compare furosemide-induced diuresis with matched hydration therapy compared to standard hydration.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Furosemide and matched saline hydration by RenalGuard system
Furosemide and matched saline hydration
Subjects will begin treatment approximately 90 minutes prior to the start of catheterization procedure. After a pre-hydration bolus of 250 ml of normal saline solution over 30 minutes the patient will receive 0.5 mg/kg of furosemide intravenously. Then, a replacement solution (saline) is given in an amount matched (ml for ml) to the volume of urine produced. Matched hydration will occur prior, during, and 4 hours post procedure.
2
Standard IV saline infusion
isotonic saline solution
Subjects will receive 1 ml/Kg/hr of intravenous saline solution for a minimum of 12 hours prior to catheterization. Hydration will continue to occur during the catheterization, and for a minimum of 12 hours post catheterization.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Furosemide and matched saline hydration
Subjects will begin treatment approximately 90 minutes prior to the start of catheterization procedure. After a pre-hydration bolus of 250 ml of normal saline solution over 30 minutes the patient will receive 0.5 mg/kg of furosemide intravenously. Then, a replacement solution (saline) is given in an amount matched (ml for ml) to the volume of urine produced. Matched hydration will occur prior, during, and 4 hours post procedure.
isotonic saline solution
Subjects will receive 1 ml/Kg/hr of intravenous saline solution for a minimum of 12 hours prior to catheterization. Hydration will continue to occur during the catheterization, and for a minimum of 12 hours post catheterization.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
4. Baseline Renal Function eGFR \< 60ml/min, by MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) calculator.
5. Patient has agreed to all follow-up testing.
1. Catheterization procedure requiring a direct renal injection of contrast or an injection into the descending aorta proximal to the renal arteries.
2. Requires emergent catheterization or primary percutaneous intervention.
3. Subject is anuric, has been hospitalized for any change in renal function or has undergone renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis or hemofiltration) within the past month.
4. Known inability to place a Foley catheter
5. Currently has a known electrolyte imbalance or clinically significant arrhythmias which compromise subject's hemodynamic state.
6. Has received intravenous contrast within 10 days of procedure or has a planned procedure using contrast within 72 hours following the procedure.
7. Has documented respiratory insufficiency as evidenced by an oxygen saturation of \< 90% on room air assessed on day of procedure.
8. Currently receiving or expected to receive Mannitol or Lithium therapy
9. Planned addition, discontinuation or dose adjustment of the trimethoprim, cimetidine, metaclopramide and/or the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 48 hours of the procedure.
10. Subject has a known hypersensitivity to furosemide.
11. Subject is currently, plans, or has been enrolled in another clinical study involving use of an investigational drug or device within the prior 30 days.
12. If female, subject is pregnant or breastfeeding.
13. Subject is unable to provide informed consent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centro Cardiologico Monzino
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Centro Cardiologico Monzino- University of Milan
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antonio L Bartorelli, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Milan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro Cardiologico Monzino- University of Milan
Milan, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Marenzi G, Marana I, Lauri G, Assanelli E, Grazi M, Campodonico J, Trabattoni D, Fabbiocchi F, Montorsi P, Bartorelli AL. The prevention of radiocontrast-agent-induced nephropathy by hemofiltration. N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 2;349(14):1333-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa023204.
Mueller C, Buerkle G, Buettner HJ, Petersen J, Perruchoud AP, Eriksson U, Marsch S, Roskamm H. Prevention of contrast media-associated nephropathy: randomized comparison of 2 hydration regimens in 1620 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Feb 11;162(3):329-36. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.3.329.
Solomon R, Werner C, Mann D, D'Elia J, Silva P. Effects of saline, mannitol, and furosemide on acute decreases in renal function induced by radiocontrast agents. N Engl J Med. 1994 Nov 24;331(21):1416-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199411243312104.
Marenzi G, Lauri G, Campodonico J, Marana I, Assanelli E, De Metrio M, Grazi M, Veglia F, Fabbiocchi F, Montorsi P, Bartorelli AL. Comparison of two hemofiltration protocols for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in high-risk patients. Am J Med. 2006 Feb;119(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.08.002.
Hashimoto H, Yamada H, Murata M, Watanabe N. Diuretics for preventing and treating acute kidney injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD014937. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014937.pub2.
Marenzi G, Ferrari C, Marana I, Assanelli E, De Metrio M, Teruzzi G, Veglia F, Fabbiocchi F, Montorsi P, Bartorelli AL. Prevention of contrast nephropathy by furosemide with matched hydration: the MYTHOS (Induced Diuresis With Matched Hydration Compared to Standard Hydration for Contrast Induced Nephropathy Prevention) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jan;5(1):90-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.017.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EUDRACT No: 2008-001200-23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
R100-CCFM S103/208
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.