Effectiveness of Extended Treatments for Drug Dependence
NCT ID: NCT00685659
Last Updated: 2017-08-07
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
332 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-05-31
2011-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Extending Long-term Outcomes Through an Adaptive Aftercare Intervention
NCT02143063
Treatment of Heroin and Cocaine With Methadone Maintenance and Contingency Management
NCT00292110
Behavioral Therapy Combined With Carbidopa/Levodopa for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence
NCT00218075
Effectiveness of Enhanced Treatments for Drug Dependence
NCT01153477
Medications for Stopping Cocaine Dependence and Preventing Relapse
NCT00218023
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cocaine dependent patients who have completed 2 weeks of intensive outpatient treatment (IOP) will be randomly assigned to one of the following interventions: (1) continued participation in IOP without additional intervention (TAU); (2) TAU plus an adaptive protocol that includes monitoring, feedback, and brief counseling via telephone on a tapered schedule out to 24 months, and more intensive face-to-face treatment when warranted (TMAC); or (3) TAU and the adaptive protocol, plus incentives for sustained participation (TMAC-Plus). Patients will be followed up at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months post intake into the study. Follow-up assessments will include measures of drug use, treatment process and potential mediating factors, psychosocial problem severity, utilization of health and social services, and costs.
The two adaptive extended interventions (TMAC and TMAC-Plus) are predicted to produce better drug use outcomes than TAU. TMAC-Plus is hypothesized to produce better retention and drug use outcomes than TMAC. Economic analyses will determine the cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost of TMAC and TMF-Plus relative to TAU, and to each other. Other analyses will test mediation hypotheses, examine potential moderator effects, and test the impact of disease management on HIV risk behaviors.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TAU only
Control condition that consists of treatment as usual, which is Intensive Outpatient Treatment (about 3 months long)
Intensive Outpatient Treatment
9 hours of group counseling per week for 2-3 months
TMAC only
Adaptive telephone-based counseling
Adaptive telephone-based counseling
In addition to IOP, patients receive telephone counseling calls, in which risk level is assessed and coping skills intervention delivered to address risk areas. Adaptive stepped care algorithm is included
TMAC plus
Adaptive telephone-based counseling, plus incentives
Adaptive telephone-based counseling plus incentives
In addition to IOP, patients receive telephone counseling calls, in which risk level is assessed and coping skills intervention delivered to address risk areas. Adaptive stepped care algorithm and monetary incentives for participation are included
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intensive Outpatient Treatment
9 hours of group counseling per week for 2-3 months
Adaptive telephone-based counseling
In addition to IOP, patients receive telephone counseling calls, in which risk level is assessed and coping skills intervention delivered to address risk areas. Adaptive stepped care algorithm is included
Adaptive telephone-based counseling plus incentives
In addition to IOP, patients receive telephone counseling calls, in which risk level is assessed and coping skills intervention delivered to address risk areas. Adaptive stepped care algorithm and monetary incentives for participation are included
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* initial engagement in IOP, as indicated by attendance at 4 or more sessions in the first two weeks of treatment;
* 18 to 75 years of age;
* willingness to be randomized and participate in research.
* metropolitan area residents;
* able to provide the name, verified telephone number, and address of at least one contact who can provide locator information on the patient during follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria
* acute medical problem requiring immediate inpatient treatment;
* current participation in methadone or other forms of DA treatment, other than IOP
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James R McKay, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Presbyterian Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
NorthEast Treatment Centers
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
McKay JR, Van Horn DH, Lynch KG, Ivey M, Cary MS, Drapkin ML, Coviello DM, Plebani JG. An adaptive approach for identifying cocaine dependent patients who benefit from extended continuing care. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):1063-73. doi: 10.1037/a0034265. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
McKay JR, Van Horn DH, Lynch KG, Ivey M, Cary MS, Drapkin M, Coviello D. Who benefits from extended continuing care for cocaine dependence? Addict Behav. 2014 Mar;39(3):660-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
McKay JR, Van Horn D, Rennert L, Drapkin M, Ivey M, Koppenhaver J. Factors in sustained recovery from cocaine dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Aug;45(2):163-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
Van Horn DH, Drapkin M, Ivey M, Thomas T, Domis SW, Abdalla O, Herd D, McKay JR. Voucher incentives increase treatment participation in telephone-based continuing care for cocaine dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Apr 1;114(2-3):225-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.09.007. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
Wimberly AS, Ivey M, Rennert L, McKay JR. Effect of Continuing Care for Cocaine Dependence on HIV Sex-Risk Behaviors. AIDS Behav. 2017 Apr;21(4):1082-1090. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1434-6.
McCollister K, Yang X, McKay JR. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a continuing care intervention for cocaine-dependent adults. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jan 1;158:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.10.032. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.