Carbidopa/Levodopa Combined With Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence

NCT ID: NCT00713583

Last Updated: 2018-04-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

85 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cocaine dependence is a major public health problem and the development of a treatment for this disorder is a priority. To date, treatment interventions based on positive incentive principles have shown the strongest effects for improving substance use outcomes. One such example is contingency management (CM) interventions in which nondrug rewards are used to compete with cocaine. Recent evidence suggests that certain medications improve response to CM interventions, particularly agents that target dopamine reward systems in the brain. A promising dopamine-enhancing medication is levodopa. The study team has observed the strongest effects of levodopa when the medication is administered in the context of CM therapy, perhaps through mechanisms that enhance reward saliency. The proposed study is designed to further evaluate this promising treatment approach. Cocaine dependent outpatients will participate in a randomized, 2-group (levodopa vs. placebo), double-blind clinical trial. CM will be behavioral therapy platform for both treatment groups. The study will test the primary hypothesis that CM+levodopa will be more effective than CM+placebo in reducing cocaine use. This study is expected to validate the usefulness of a new behavioral-pharmacological treatment approach for cocaine dependence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cocaine Dependence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Levodopa pharmacotherapy

Levodopa pharmacotherapy (800mg levodopa and 200mg carbidopa per day), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and contingency management (CM).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

levodopa

Intervention Type DRUG

800mg levodopa and 200mg carbidopa per day

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants received individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in 50-minute weekly sessions. These sessions were manual-driven and based on the relapse prevention model proposed by Marlatt and Gordon (1985). Trained masters-level therapists, under the supervision of senior therapists and the principal investigator, worked with participants to teach them how to recognize and cope with risky situations that could influence their cocaine use through self-monitoring of situational craving and drug use stimuli, coping skills training, and lifestyle modifications.

Contingency Management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

An abstinence-based contingency management (CM) procedure was used. Participants earned vouchers according to the reward schedule recommended by Budney and Higgins (1998), beginning at $2.50 for the first cocaine-negative urine. For each consecutive cocaine-negative urine, voucher values increased by $1.25 with a $10 bonus given for provision of three consecutive cocaine-negative urines within a week. A cocaine-positive urine or failure to provide a scheduled urine sample resulted in a reset of the schedule to the initial value of $2.50. After provision of five negative urines, the voucher returned to the value prior to the reset. Participants were able to redeem their vouchers for small amounts of cash (≤$25) or gift cards for goods and services.

Placebo

Placebo, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and contingency management (CM).

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants received individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in 50-minute weekly sessions. These sessions were manual-driven and based on the relapse prevention model proposed by Marlatt and Gordon (1985). Trained masters-level therapists, under the supervision of senior therapists and the principal investigator, worked with participants to teach them how to recognize and cope with risky situations that could influence their cocaine use through self-monitoring of situational craving and drug use stimuli, coping skills training, and lifestyle modifications.

Contingency Management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

An abstinence-based contingency management (CM) procedure was used. Participants earned vouchers according to the reward schedule recommended by Budney and Higgins (1998), beginning at $2.50 for the first cocaine-negative urine. For each consecutive cocaine-negative urine, voucher values increased by $1.25 with a $10 bonus given for provision of three consecutive cocaine-negative urines within a week. A cocaine-positive urine or failure to provide a scheduled urine sample resulted in a reset of the schedule to the initial value of $2.50. After provision of five negative urines, the voucher returned to the value prior to the reset. Participants were able to redeem their vouchers for small amounts of cash (≤$25) or gift cards for goods and services.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

levodopa

800mg levodopa and 200mg carbidopa per day

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Participants received individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in 50-minute weekly sessions. These sessions were manual-driven and based on the relapse prevention model proposed by Marlatt and Gordon (1985). Trained masters-level therapists, under the supervision of senior therapists and the principal investigator, worked with participants to teach them how to recognize and cope with risky situations that could influence their cocaine use through self-monitoring of situational craving and drug use stimuli, coping skills training, and lifestyle modifications.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Contingency Management

An abstinence-based contingency management (CM) procedure was used. Participants earned vouchers according to the reward schedule recommended by Budney and Higgins (1998), beginning at $2.50 for the first cocaine-negative urine. For each consecutive cocaine-negative urine, voucher values increased by $1.25 with a $10 bonus given for provision of three consecutive cocaine-negative urines within a week. A cocaine-positive urine or failure to provide a scheduled urine sample resulted in a reset of the schedule to the initial value of $2.50. After provision of five negative urines, the voucher returned to the value prior to the reset. Participants were able to redeem their vouchers for small amounts of cash (≤$25) or gift cards for goods and services.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sinemet

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* between 18 and 60 years of age
* meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th. Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for current cocaine dependence.
* be in acceptable health on the basis of interview, medical history and physical exam.

Exclusion Criteria

* current DSM-IV diagnosis of any psychoactive substance dependence other than cocaine, marijuana, or nicotine.
* have a DSM-IV axis I psychiatric disorder or neurological disease or disorder requiring ongoing treatment and/or making study participation unsafe.
* have significant current suicidal or homicidal ideation.
* have medical conditions contraindicating levodopa/carbidopa pharmacotherapy. Conditions include severe pulmonary disease (bronchial asthma, emphysema), cardiovascular disease (severe or history of myocardial infarction with residual arrhythmias), narrow angle glaucoma, melanoma, history of peptic ulcer, renal function impairment.
* taking medications known to have significant drug interactions with levodopa/carbidopa (e.g., monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, anticonvulsants, haloperidol, phenothiazines, selegiline, anesthetics).
* currently or recently (last 3 months) treated for substance use or another psychiatric condition.
* having conditions of probation or parole requiring reports of drug use to officers of the court.
* impending incarceration.
* pregnant or nursing for female patients.
* inability to read, write, or speak English.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joy Schmitz

Professor - Psychiatry, Behavioral Sciences

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joy M Schmitz, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Texas at Houston

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01DA023608-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

R01DA023608-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

DPMCDA

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1R01DA023608-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.