Carbidopa/Levodopa Combined With Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence
NCT ID: NCT00713583
Last Updated: 2018-04-23
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
85 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-01-31
2011-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Behavioral Therapy Combined With Carbidopa/Levodopa for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence
NCT00218075
Medications for Stopping Cocaine Dependence and Preventing Relapse
NCT00218023
Cognitive Remediation for Cocaine Dependence
NCT01393457
Imaging the Neurobiology of Behavioral and Medication Treatment for Cocaine Dependence
NCT01468012
Behavioral and Physiological Effects of Cocaine in Cocaine-dependent Participants Treated With Levodopa in Combination With Carbidopa and Entacapone (LCE)
NCT01437293
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Levodopa pharmacotherapy
Levodopa pharmacotherapy (800mg levodopa and 200mg carbidopa per day), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and contingency management (CM).
levodopa
800mg levodopa and 200mg carbidopa per day
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Participants received individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in 50-minute weekly sessions. These sessions were manual-driven and based on the relapse prevention model proposed by Marlatt and Gordon (1985). Trained masters-level therapists, under the supervision of senior therapists and the principal investigator, worked with participants to teach them how to recognize and cope with risky situations that could influence their cocaine use through self-monitoring of situational craving and drug use stimuli, coping skills training, and lifestyle modifications.
Contingency Management
An abstinence-based contingency management (CM) procedure was used. Participants earned vouchers according to the reward schedule recommended by Budney and Higgins (1998), beginning at $2.50 for the first cocaine-negative urine. For each consecutive cocaine-negative urine, voucher values increased by $1.25 with a $10 bonus given for provision of three consecutive cocaine-negative urines within a week. A cocaine-positive urine or failure to provide a scheduled urine sample resulted in a reset of the schedule to the initial value of $2.50. After provision of five negative urines, the voucher returned to the value prior to the reset. Participants were able to redeem their vouchers for small amounts of cash (≤$25) or gift cards for goods and services.
Placebo
Placebo, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and contingency management (CM).
Placebo
Placebo
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Participants received individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in 50-minute weekly sessions. These sessions were manual-driven and based on the relapse prevention model proposed by Marlatt and Gordon (1985). Trained masters-level therapists, under the supervision of senior therapists and the principal investigator, worked with participants to teach them how to recognize and cope with risky situations that could influence their cocaine use through self-monitoring of situational craving and drug use stimuli, coping skills training, and lifestyle modifications.
Contingency Management
An abstinence-based contingency management (CM) procedure was used. Participants earned vouchers according to the reward schedule recommended by Budney and Higgins (1998), beginning at $2.50 for the first cocaine-negative urine. For each consecutive cocaine-negative urine, voucher values increased by $1.25 with a $10 bonus given for provision of three consecutive cocaine-negative urines within a week. A cocaine-positive urine or failure to provide a scheduled urine sample resulted in a reset of the schedule to the initial value of $2.50. After provision of five negative urines, the voucher returned to the value prior to the reset. Participants were able to redeem their vouchers for small amounts of cash (≤$25) or gift cards for goods and services.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
levodopa
800mg levodopa and 200mg carbidopa per day
Placebo
Placebo
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Participants received individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in 50-minute weekly sessions. These sessions were manual-driven and based on the relapse prevention model proposed by Marlatt and Gordon (1985). Trained masters-level therapists, under the supervision of senior therapists and the principal investigator, worked with participants to teach them how to recognize and cope with risky situations that could influence their cocaine use through self-monitoring of situational craving and drug use stimuli, coping skills training, and lifestyle modifications.
Contingency Management
An abstinence-based contingency management (CM) procedure was used. Participants earned vouchers according to the reward schedule recommended by Budney and Higgins (1998), beginning at $2.50 for the first cocaine-negative urine. For each consecutive cocaine-negative urine, voucher values increased by $1.25 with a $10 bonus given for provision of three consecutive cocaine-negative urines within a week. A cocaine-positive urine or failure to provide a scheduled urine sample resulted in a reset of the schedule to the initial value of $2.50. After provision of five negative urines, the voucher returned to the value prior to the reset. Participants were able to redeem their vouchers for small amounts of cash (≤$25) or gift cards for goods and services.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th. Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for current cocaine dependence.
* be in acceptable health on the basis of interview, medical history and physical exam.
Exclusion Criteria
* have a DSM-IV axis I psychiatric disorder or neurological disease or disorder requiring ongoing treatment and/or making study participation unsafe.
* have significant current suicidal or homicidal ideation.
* have medical conditions contraindicating levodopa/carbidopa pharmacotherapy. Conditions include severe pulmonary disease (bronchial asthma, emphysema), cardiovascular disease (severe or history of myocardial infarction with residual arrhythmias), narrow angle glaucoma, melanoma, history of peptic ulcer, renal function impairment.
* taking medications known to have significant drug interactions with levodopa/carbidopa (e.g., monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, anticonvulsants, haloperidol, phenothiazines, selegiline, anesthetics).
* currently or recently (last 3 months) treated for substance use or another psychiatric condition.
* having conditions of probation or parole requiring reports of drug use to officers of the court.
* impending incarceration.
* pregnant or nursing for female patients.
* inability to read, write, or speak English.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joy Schmitz
Professor - Psychiatry, Behavioral Sciences
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joy M Schmitz, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Texas at Houston
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.