Long Term Maintenance of Drug Abstinence

NCT ID: NCT00842517

Last Updated: 2023-03-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

166 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-09-30

Study Completion Date

2008-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to develop a model for long-term maintenance of behavior change by examining the effects of extending the duration of contingency management (CM) for drug abuse on long-term abstinence outcomes. The primary hypothesis is that the Extended (36 week) CM group will have better long-term outcomes as exhibited by greater rates of abstinence at each follow-up assessment as compared to the Standard (12 week) CM group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This protocol examines the effects of extending the duration of contingency management (CM) for drug abuse and dependence on long-term abstinence outcomes. Following the tenets of basic behavioral research, we have outlined a model for long-term behavior maintenance that suggests that successful long-term behavior change does not focus on undoing old behaviors, but concentrates on developing new behaviors in a wide variety of new contexts, and provides enduring reinforcement for the new behaviors. The implication of this model is that in order to develop strategies for supporting long-term behavior change we need to determine the optimal duration of continuing treatment-arranged contingencies, better specify incompatible behaviors that emerge for patients who are successful in sustaining periods of continuous drug abstinence, and determine which incompatible behaviors are most likely to have naturally-occurring sustaining contingencies of reinforcement. This research will examine the model by randomly assigning cocaine-dependent or cocaine-abusing methadone maintenance patients to either a Standard (12 week) or Extended (36 week) period of contrived contingencies. We will be conducting a 2 year follow-up in order to investigate whether providing a longer duration of CM will result in a greater proportion of abstinent individuals during this time, how long the abstinence will last and to discover if longer durations of drug abstinence during the first year after treatment entry will predict better longer-term abstinence outcomes. We also compare outcomes on abstinence-related behaviors to see if provision of an extended voucher program leads to an increase in non-drug using natural reinforcers and activities. This study participates in the NIH-sponsored Health Maintenance Consortium designed to promote interchange of concepts, methods and measures related to the maintenance of long-term behavior change.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cocaine Dependence Cocaine Abuse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Extended

36-week duration contingency management program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Contingency Management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Standard

12-week duration contingency management program

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Contingency Management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Contingency Management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Meet DSM-IV criteria for current cocaine dependence or abuse
* Be willing and able to give valid contact information
* Be receiving a stable dose of 40 milligrams or more of methadone

Exclusion Criteria

* Are unable to give informed consent (fails simple open-ended consent quiz)
* Answer yes to the question "Are you in recovery from gambling? That is, have you stopped gambling because of previous problems with gambling?"
* Report that they have a romantic partner who is already participating in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Treatment Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Treatment Research Institute

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kimberly C Kirby, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Treatment Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Parkside Recovery

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01DA017444

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

0308

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.