Evaluation of Different Strategies of Pericardial Drainage After Aortic Valvular Surgery

NCT ID: NCT00684125

Last Updated: 2011-07-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The incidence of pericardial effusion and late cardiac tamponade after aortic and valvular surgery is higher than after other cardiac surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of prolonged mediastinal drainage using small, soft silastic drains (Blake drain, Ethicon USA) versus conventional mediastinal drainage using large chest tubes. A prospective randomized trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The incidence of pericardial effusion and late cardiac tamponade after aortic and valvular surgery is higher than after other cardiac surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of prolonged mediastinal drainage using small, soft silastic drains (Blake drain, Ethicon USA) versus conventional mediastinal drainage using large chest tubes. Patients undergoing aortic and / or valvular surgery will be randomized in two groups. In group A, mediastinal drainage will be accomplished using a 28F or 32F chest tube in the anterior mediastinum and a 19F Blake drain located in the posterior pericardial cavity. In group B, mediastinal drainage will be accomplished using two 28F or 32F chest tubes located in the anterior mediastinum. In both groups, conventional chest tubes will be removed on the first postoperative day, while patients in the group A will have prolonged drainage using the Blake drain until output is less than 50 ml over 24 hour. Patients will be followed during their postoperative course for occurrence of significant pericardial effusion as detected on routine echocardiogram and late cardiac tamponade requiring reintervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pericardial Effusion Late Cardiac Tamponade Surgical Reintervention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

mediastinal drainage will be accomplished using a 28F or 32F chest tube in the anterior mediastinum and a 19F Blake drain located in the posterior pericardial cavity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Blake Drains (Blake drain, Ethicon USA)

Intervention Type DEVICE

19F Blake drain located in the posterior pericardial cavity

2

mediastinal drainage will be accomplished using two 28F or 32F chest tubes located in the anterior mediastinum.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard mediastinal drainage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Mediastinal drainage will be accomplished using 28F or 32F chest tube located in the anterior mediastinum

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Blake Drains (Blake drain, Ethicon USA)

19F Blake drain located in the posterior pericardial cavity

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard mediastinal drainage

Mediastinal drainage will be accomplished using 28F or 32F chest tube located in the anterior mediastinum

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Blake drain: prolonged mediastinal drainage mediastinal drainage

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged between 18 and 90 years old, undergoing either surgery of the ascending and/or transverse aorta, or surgery of the mitral and/or aortic valves

Exclusion Criteria

* Emergency surgery
* Unavailability for follow-up at the Montreal Heart Institute
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johnson & Johnson

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Montreal Heart Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Montreal Heart Institute - Cardiac surgeon

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Phillippe Demers, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Montreal Heart Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Montreal Heart Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Eryilmaz S, Emiroglu O, Eyileten Z, Akar R, Yazicioglu L, Tasoz R, Kaya B, Uysalel A, Ucanok K, Corapcioglu T, Ozyurda U. Effect of posterior pericardial drainage on the incidence of pericardial effusion after ascending aortic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Jul;132(1):27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.01.049.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16798298 (View on PubMed)

Agati S, Mignosa C, Gitto P, Trimarchi ES, Ciccarello G, Salvo D, Trimarchi G. A method for chest drainage after pediatric cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Jun;131(6):1306-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.02.013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16733162 (View on PubMed)

Ege T, Tatli E, Canbaz S, Cikirikcioglu M, Sunar H, Ozalp B, Duran E. The importance of intrapericardial drain selection in cardiac surgery. Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1559-62. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1559.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15539727 (View on PubMed)

Obney JA, Barnes MJ, Lisagor PG, Cohen DJ. A method for mediastinal drainage after cardiac procedures using small silastic drains. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Sep;70(3):1109-10. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01800-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11016389 (View on PubMed)

Kuvin JT, Harati NA, Pandian NG, Bojar RM, Khabbaz KR. Postoperative cardiac tamponade in the modern surgical era. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Oct;74(4):1148-53. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03837-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12400760 (View on PubMed)

Shah A, van den Brink A, de Mol B. Raised international normalized ratio: an early warning for a late cardiac tamponade? Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Sep;82(3):1090-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.01.035.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16928545 (View on PubMed)

Moss E, Miller CS, Jensen H, Basmadjian A, Bouchard D, Carrier M, Perrault LP, Cartier R, Pellerin M, Demers P. A randomized trial of early versus delayed mediastinal drain removal after cardiac surgery using silastic and conventional tubes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jul;17(1):110-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt123.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23575759 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ICM 07-934

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.