Medical Abortion for Emergency Contraception Failure

NCT ID: NCT00677755

Last Updated: 2008-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

394 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-10-31

Study Completion Date

2007-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and acceptability of pre-treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in the medical termination of pregnancy by mifepristone EC failure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Women usually request an abortion when they have experienced an emergency contraception (EC) failure; this population represents 13% of all early pregnancy terminations in China. Many women would prefer to choose a medical abortion in order to avoid anesthesia, over a surgical operation. However, medical termination of a pregnancy after mifepristone EC failure has not been studied although it has already been extensively practiced by empirical means in China. There is no clarification in literature as to whether mifepristone is still effective in medical abortion with its previous failure experience in EC. This randomized study was aimed to compare the efficacy, safety and acceptability of pre-treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in the medical termination of pregnancy by mifepristone EC failure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Emergency Contraception Abortion, Induced

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Medical abortion emergency contraception mifepristone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mf+Ms

The women in mifepristone combined misoprostol group (Mf+Ms) received a single dose of mifepristone (Mifepristone tablets; Xianju Pharmacy, Zhejiang, China) 200mg orally on day 1, and then returned to the clinic on day 3 and were given misoprostol (Cytotec tables; Searle,A Division of Monsanto.P.L.C, England )0.8mg orally

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mifepristone combined misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

women received a single dose of mifepristone (Mifepristone tablets; Xianju Pharmacy, Zhejiang, China) 200mg orally on day 1, and then returned to the clinic on day 3 and were given misoprostol (Cytotec tables; Searle,A Division of Monsanto.P.L.C, England )0.8mg orally

Ms-alone

The control group (Ms-alone) patients were only administered 0.8 mg of misoprostol orally on day 3.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

misoprostol alone protocol

Intervention Type DRUG

patients were only administered 0.8 mg of misoprostol orally on day 3.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mifepristone combined misoprostol

women received a single dose of mifepristone (Mifepristone tablets; Xianju Pharmacy, Zhejiang, China) 200mg orally on day 1, and then returned to the clinic on day 3 and were given misoprostol (Cytotec tables; Searle,A Division of Monsanto.P.L.C, England )0.8mg orally

Intervention Type DRUG

misoprostol alone protocol

patients were only administered 0.8 mg of misoprostol orally on day 3.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants included in the study were women aged 16 years or older
* with good general health,
* experiencing a mifepristone emergency contraception failure,
* presenting an intrauterine singleton pregnancy confirmed by pelvic ultrasound scan, with a crown-rump length compatible within 56 days of gestation at the enrolled day, and
* seeking a medical abortion for unwanted pregnancy.
* Women who had a threatened abortion or a failure pregnancy were also included.
* Participants were required to sign an informed consent form before enrolment, willing to comply with the schedule of follow-up visits and willing to undergo surgical aspiration if indicated.

Exclusion Criteria

* allergy or contraindications for mifepristone (chronic systemic corticosteroid therapy, adrenal insufficiency) or misoprostol (hypertension, mitral stenosis, severe asthma, glaucoma, sickle cell anemia and hypotension),
* history or evidence of thromboembolism, cardiovascular disease or liver disease, hemoglobin ≤ 90 g/l, heavy smoking (more than 10 per day),
* presence of an intrauterine device, and breastfeeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Taizhou Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Taizhou hospital of Zhejiang Province

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

YiYang Zhu, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Centra for Reproductive Medicine of Taizhou hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Taizhou Hospital of zhejiang Province

Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Taizhou2004-08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id