Comparative Study of Epigastric Pain Syndrome and Postprandial Distress Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT00673972

Last Updated: 2010-03-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-04-30

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome in demographics psychological features, infection of Helicobacter pylori, gastric emptying and therapeutic response to lansoprazole.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Functional dyspepsia is a common clinical disorder with significant impact on quality of life and with enormous social cost. Previous studies have revealed that functional dyspepsia is not a homogenous disease but a heterogenous symptom complex. Because of heterogeneity in etiology and pathogenesis, no specific treatment is appropriate for all patients with functional dyspepsia. Currently available treatments demonstrated efficacy only in subsets of patients.

Appropriate subgrouping of functional dyspepsia, which categorizes more homogenous patients into the same group, will correlate better with specific etiologic factors and pathogenetic mechanisms. Consequently patients may have appropriate specific treatment based on more directed pathologenesis and subgrouping. To this end, American Gastroenterology Association launched new edition of clinical guide for functional gastrointestinal disorder, the Rome III in May 2006. The new diagnostic criteria of Rome III de-emphasized functional dyspepsia as an entity and recommended sub-classification into two conditions: postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome. However whether this new diagnostic criteria and systems are effective and clinically relevant remains unknown.

Aims:

We aim to compare postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome in demographics psychological features, infection of Helicobacter pylori, gastric emptying and therapeutic response to lansoprazole.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Functional Dyspepsia Epigastric Pain Syndrome Post Prandial Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EPS

Patients with functional dyspepsia will be classified into EPS or PDS two subgroups according to Rome III diagnostic criteria.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

gastric scintigraphy

Intervention Type RADIATION

All tests start after overnight fast. Test meals consists of 120g scrambled egg, two slices of toasted bread, 30g of strawberry jam and 120ml of water. 12MBg (0.33mCi) of 99mTc sulfur colloid is mixed with egg thoroughly before the mixture cooked in a microwave oven for 2 minutes. All meals are prepared on the morning of examination and consumed within 20 minutes.

Anterior and posterior images of the gastric region are taken within one minute after completion of test meals. Subsequent images are taken every 2 minutes in the first 60 minutes and at 120 minutes and 180 minutes. One-min images of gastric region at upright position are taken in the 140keV 99mTc peak with a 20% window.

PDS

Patients with functional dyspepsia will be classified into EPS or PDS two subgroups according to Rome III diagnostic criteria.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

gastric scintigraphy

Intervention Type RADIATION

All tests start after overnight fast. Test meals consists of 120g scrambled egg, two slices of toasted bread, 30g of strawberry jam and 120ml of water. 12MBg (0.33mCi) of 99mTc sulfur colloid is mixed with egg thoroughly before the mixture cooked in a microwave oven for 2 minutes. All meals are prepared on the morning of examination and consumed within 20 minutes.

Anterior and posterior images of the gastric region are taken within one minute after completion of test meals. Subsequent images are taken every 2 minutes in the first 60 minutes and at 120 minutes and 180 minutes. One-min images of gastric region at upright position are taken in the 140keV 99mTc peak with a 20% window.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

gastric scintigraphy

All tests start after overnight fast. Test meals consists of 120g scrambled egg, two slices of toasted bread, 30g of strawberry jam and 120ml of water. 12MBg (0.33mCi) of 99mTc sulfur colloid is mixed with egg thoroughly before the mixture cooked in a microwave oven for 2 minutes. All meals are prepared on the morning of examination and consumed within 20 minutes.

Anterior and posterior images of the gastric region are taken within one minute after completion of test meals. Subsequent images are taken every 2 minutes in the first 60 minutes and at 120 minutes and 180 minutes. One-min images of gastric region at upright position are taken in the 140keV 99mTc peak with a 20% window.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

gastric emptying time

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aged greater than 20 years
* fulfill Rome III diagnostic criteria

Exclusion Criteria

* children and teenagers aged less than 20 years
* Organic lesions such as ulcers, tumors, bleeding, vasculopathy or esophagitis as demonstrated on upper endoscopy
* concurrent illness with malignancy, diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, renal failure or porphyria
* diagnosis of organic disease for dyspeptic symptoms by treating physicians
* history of abdominal surgery
* concurrent user of aspirin and NSAID
* history of allergy or severe side effects to lansoparzole
* pregnant or lactating women
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ming-Shiang Wu, M.D.PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

200705051M

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.