Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
13 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-05-31
2015-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treating Oxidative Stress in Children With Autism
NCT00692315
Folic Acid Clinical Trial: Follow up of Children (FACT 4 Child)
NCT03269110
Efficacy of Weekly Versus Daily Folic Acid Supplementation
NCT00394862
A Folinic Acid Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorders
NCT01602016
Folate Augmentation of Treatment - Evaluation for Depression: a Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT00514410
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Overall, investigations on folic acid supplementation with small groups of FRAX participants have yielded inconsistent findings, with favorable behavioral and/or biochemical effects for some but not others. Moreover, the findings cannot be generalized to the broader population of children with AD who do not have FRAX. Our search of the literature uncovered only one report of folic acid treatment prescribed for 2 children without FRAX, one of whom was described as psychotic with mental retardation and the other, as having a diagnosis of autism. For both children, behaviors were notably improved with treatment and returned to problematic levels when folic acid therapy stopped.
In addition to these few empirical studies, there are numerous anecdotal reports of families using folate treatments with their children, most of which are promulgated through Internet websites and the Autism Research Institute's (ARI) publication, Autism Research Review International. For the most part, these reports are favorable. Additionally, the ARI recently published findings from their web-based investigation on the parent-reported use and efficacy of a wide range of treatments for children with AD. Of the 1437 families who indicated use of folic acid as a therapeutic supplement, 42% said their children got better, 54% said their children did not exhibit noticeable changes, and 3% said their children got worse. Taken together, these limited data support the possibility for folic acid and other folates to generate favorable outcomes among children with AD; this may hold true particularly for pre-adolescent children.
The lack of empirically sound information about folic-acid efficacy among children with AD, however, also leaves open the possibility that increased supplementation may not be helpful and could, in fact, be harmful. There is some evidence to suggest that high doses of folic acid supplementation produce negative physiological and/or behavioral responses, such as gastrointestinal disturbances, sleep difficulties, malaise/irritability, and excitability/overactivity in a sample of typical adults. Many of these symptoms are similar if not identical to those described more generally in children with AD. Additionally, just as there are favorable anecdotal reports of folic acid treatment, there are negative ones, as well. For example, parents of one teenager with AD told us that, when their son participated in a stepwise-administered supplement program and folic acid was administered as the final supplement, he became extremely agitated, self-injurious, aggressive toward parents, prone to frantic gesturing, and developed sleep difficulties. When the folic acid was withdrawn, his behaviors gradually subsided to a pre-supplementation level (personal communication, September 27, 2003).
As to whether folic acid supplementation might be "good" or "bad," an alternative explanation is that folic acid may be beneficial in some circumstances and harmful in others. This explanation is potentially attractive if one hypothesizes that the conversion of homocysteine to methionine (for which folate is necessary) is beneficial, but that high doses of folic acid can lead to anti-folate effects by accumulation of "free folic acid." For individuals with an imbalanced metabolic profile but adequate levels of B12, it seems that folic acid supplementation would yield favorable effects by normalizing this profile. However, folic acid supplementation could lead to problematic behaviors through any one or combination of biological scenarios, including accumulation of unmetabolized pteroylglutamic acid (PGA) in serum, B12 deficiency, and/or genotypes known to impede the biochemical conversion of folic acid. Given that negative responses to folic acid supplementation have typically been reported among adolescents and adults, it is further possible that this phenomenon is regulated by maturational processes.
One possibility for achieving maximum folate benefit without the risk of anti-folate effects is through supplementation with a form of folate, Metafolin, that can serve directly as a methyl donor. Metafolin is the L-form isomer of 5- methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) and, presumably, a more active compound than folic acid or folinic acid (leucovorin). Metafolin has been approved for use in the U.S. as a dietary supplement since 2001. While studies around the globe have tested the safety of 5-MTHF at doses up to 17mg, there have not yet been any studies to examine its efficacy as a therapeutic agent in specific neurodevelopmental disorders. However, folinic acid (5,10- MTHF), which immediately precedes 5-MTHF in the folate-metabolism cycle, has been investigated repeatedly as a potential therapeutic agent for this population. In one such study, James et al. examined the biochemical effects of folinic acid supplementation in conjunction with betaine and vitamin B12 on the biochemical outcomes of children with imbalanced metabolic profiles. This team initially discovered that, compared with a control group, children with AD had significantly lower baseline concentrations of methionine, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), and homocysteine and significantly higher concentrations of S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) and adenosine--a metabolic profile that is consistent with impaired capacity for methylation. Following supplementation with the study treatments, the metabolic imbalance within the AD group was normalized. This same research team recently published results from an extension of this work in which they assessed levels of folate-related metabolites and genotypes for select enzymes. Approximately 50% of children with AD had severely abnormal metabolic profiles; additionally, "...several susceptibility alleles that perturb a common metabolic pathway were increased among the autistic children. The hypothesis that a genetic component of autism could involve multiple susceptibility alleles that interact to create a fragile, environmentally sensitive metabolic imbalance is worthy of further pursuit," (electronic copy; no page number available).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Folic acid
Compounded capsule, 7.6mg, taken orally, twice daily for 4 weeks.
2
Placebo
Compounded capsule of NaCl, taken orally, twice daily for 4 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Folic acid
Compounded capsule, 7.6mg, taken orally, twice daily for 4 weeks.
Placebo
Compounded capsule of NaCl, taken orally, twice daily for 4 weeks.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Child participant is in stable condition with relatively good control of seizures and no other significant medical problems, including liver, kidney, or heart problems, at the time of entrance to the study. If the child participant is taking medication for a seizure disorder, the investigators will assess his/her eligibility with particular regard to type of seizure medication and other health-related information gleaned during the medical examination
3. Child participant and parents are willing to comply with the proposed treatments
4. Child participant is able to take oral medication
5. Family is fluent in the English language
6. Parent/caregiver agrees to provide behavioral data on participating children at the requested time points
7. Family agrees to be contacted weekly by study personnel during the treatment phases
Exclusion Criteria
2. Child participant has a history of liver or renal disease
3. Child participant is currently being treated for a serious acute illness
4. Child participant has a known allergy to any of the proposed supplements
5. Child participant has uncontrolled seizures
6. Child participant meets criteria for Asperger's syndrome, PDD-NOS, or does not meet strict criteria for AD
7. Family is not proficient in the English language
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baylor College of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Arthur L. Beaudet
Professor, Mol. & Human Gen./Beaudet Lab
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-20959
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.