Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System

NCT ID: NCT00663351

Last Updated: 2022-10-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

456 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-12-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This Post-Approval study is prospective follow-up study designed to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of the Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This Post-Approval study is prospective follow-up study designed to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of the Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System. Randomized Non-inflammatory Arthritis, Randomized Inflammatory and Continued Access Cohorts patients previously enrolled in the IDE study will be evaluated annually through five (5) year follow-up. In addition, all patients enrolled in the original study cohorts as well as the continued access patients will be sent a letter questionnaire annually at the 6-10 year postoperative time point to assess the patient's general well-being and if the study components are still in place

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Reflection Ceramic-Ceramic Hip System (IP)

Investigational: Reflection Ceramic-Ceramic Hip System. Ceramic femoral head component and the ceramic acetabular cup insert are composed of Biolox forte aluminum oxide material.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Reflection Ceramic-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intervention: all patients in study required (intervention) a total hip replacement, and were randomized to receive either the (Study Device)Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System or the(Control Device) Reflection FSO V (5 hole)acetabular system. Both arms received either a Synergy porous coated or Spectron EF stem.

Reflection FSO V (5 hole) (Control)

Control: Reflection FSO V (5 hole). Acetabular shell with a ultra high molecular weight polyethylene insert and an alumina ceramic femoral head with a Synergy or Spectron EF femoral stem. The Synergy femoral stem are composed of implant grade titanium while the Spectron EF stem is composed of implant grade cobalt chrome.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Reflection FSO V Total Hip Replacement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intervention: all patients in study required (intervention) a total hip replacement, and were randomized to receive either the (Study Device)Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System or the(Control Device) Reflection FSO V (5 hole)acetabular system. Both arms received either a Synergy porous coated or Spectron EF stem.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reflection Ceramic-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement

Intervention: all patients in study required (intervention) a total hip replacement, and were randomized to receive either the (Study Device)Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System or the(Control Device) Reflection FSO V (5 hole)acetabular system. Both arms received either a Synergy porous coated or Spectron EF stem.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reflection FSO V Total Hip Replacement

Intervention: all patients in study required (intervention) a total hip replacement, and were randomized to receive either the (Study Device)Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System or the(Control Device) Reflection FSO V (5 hole)acetabular system. Both arms received either a Synergy porous coated or Spectron EF stem.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Hip Replacement Reflection ceramic-ceramic Hip replacement Reflection ceramic-poly

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

(Patient must meet all of the following characteristics to be enrolled in the study):

* Males and females, 21 to 80 years of age, inclusive;
* Primary diagnosis of non-inflammatory arthritis (osteoarthritis) or inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis), or patients requiring a revision as specified previously;
* The patient or his/her legal guardian is willing to consent to participate in the study by signing and dating the approved consent form;
* The patient will be available for follow-up through at least two years postoperative;
* The patient has met an acceptable preoperative medical clearance and is free or treated for cardiac, pulmonary, hematological, etc., conditions that would pose excessive operative risk (FDA requirement);
* The patient has a total Harris Hip Score of less than or equal to 60 (FDA requirement);

Exclusion Criteria

(Patient with any of the following characteristics must be excluded from the study):

* Patients known to have insufficient quantity or quality of bone support resulting from Conditions such as cancer, femoral osteotomy, Girdlestone resection, significant osteoporosis or metabolic disorders of calcified tissues. Patients with physical conditions tending to place extreme loads on implants such as morbid obesity (\> 100 pounds over desirable body weight), Charcot joints, muscle deficiencies, or multiple joint disabilities;
* Patients with active localized or systemic infection;
* Patients who have not reached full skeletal maturity;
* Patient psychological or neurological conditions which tend to preempt the patient's ability or willingness to restrict activities or follow medical advice, especially during the postoperative period, e.g.: drug or alcohol abuse, serious mental illness or retardation, or general neurological conditions;
* The patient is participating in any other pharmaceutical, biologic or medical device clinical investigation;
* Immunosuppressive disorders - immunosuppressive disorders are chronic conditions characterized by markedly inhibited ability to respond to antigenic stimuli. Examples of such conditions include patients who are on immunosuppressive therapy (corticosteroid hormones in large amounts, cytotoxic drugs, antilymphocytic serum or irradiation in large doses), patients receiving therapy to prevent homograft rejection, patients who have acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), or auto-immune diseases (except rheumatoid arthritis).
* Pregnancy.
* Patients with known sensitivity to materials in the device.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Scott Corpe, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical College of Georgia, Dept of Orthopaedic

Joseph Zuckerman, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital of Joint Disease, Orthopaedic Institute

Jonathan P Garino, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Presbyterian Medical Center, Dept of Orthopaedic

Michael J Grecula, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Texas Medical Branch, Dept of Orthopaedic

James Howe, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Vermont

Michael Lynch, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Memphis Orthopaedic Group, PC

Norman E Walter, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Family Orthopaedics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical College of Georgia, Department of Orthopaedics

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Family Orthopaedics

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Hospital of Joint Disease, Orthopaedic Institute

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Presbyterian Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

The Memphis Orthopaedic Group, PC

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Medical Branch, Dept of Orthopaedics and Rehab

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Vermont College of Medicine

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PMA 030022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Avenir® Cemented Hip Stem - PMCF
NCT03396224 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Prospective G7 Dual Mobility Total Hip PMCF
NCT03308929 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
CoreHip - Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Study
NCT03685110 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
CoMplete™ Acetabular Hip System
NCT01543230 TERMINATED NA