A Dose-Escalation to Rash Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) Plus Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00652366

Last Updated: 2015-02-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

467 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-05-31

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the efficacy and safety of escalating versus standard doses to rash of Tarceva, in combination with gemcitabine, in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. During a 4 week run-in period, all patients will receive Tarceva 100mg/day po plus gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 iv on days 1, 8,15 and 22. After 4 weeks, patients who have not developed rash, or only develop grade 1 rash, will be randomized to one of 2 groups. Group 1 will receive a starting dose of Tarceva 150mg po daily, increased in steps of 50mg every 2 weeks up to a maximum of 250mg/day po, until development of grade 2 rash or other dose-limiting toxicity. Group 2 will continue to receive Tarceva 100mg/day po. All patients will continue to receive gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 iv on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 4 week cycle. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gemcitabine, Erlotinib Standard Dose

Participants received erlotinib, 100 milligrams (mg), orally (PO), once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants also received gemcitabine, 1000 mg per (/) square meter (m\^2), intravenously (IV), on Days 1, 8, and 15 of consecutive 4 week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Erlotinib, standard dose

Intervention Type DRUG

100mg, PO, once daily

Gemcitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

1000 mg/m2, IV, on days 1,8 and 15 of each 4 week cycle

Gemcitabine, Erlotinib Escalating Dose

Participants received erlotinib, beginning at 150 mg/day, PO, once daily, and increasing in increments of 50 mg every 2 weeks up to a maximum of 250 mg/day, until development of a grade 2 rash, or occurrence of other, non-rash, dose-limiting toxicity; treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death or withdrawal. Participants also received gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m\^2, IV, on Days 1, 8, and 15 of consecutive 4 week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Erlotinib, escalating dose

Intervention Type DRUG

100mg, PO, once daily, escalating to a maximum of 250mg, PO, once daily

Gemcitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

1000 mg/m2, IV, on days 1,8 and 15 of each 4 week cycle

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erlotinib, escalating dose

100mg, PO, once daily, escalating to a maximum of 250mg, PO, once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Erlotinib, standard dose

100mg, PO, once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine

1000 mg/m2, IV, on days 1,8 and 15 of each 4 week cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Tarceva Tarceva

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult patients, \>=18 years of age;
* histologically or cytologically confirmed pancreatic cancer with measurable or non-measurable metastatic disease;
* ECOG performance status of 0-1.

Exclusion Criteria

* local, or locally advanced, pancreatic cancer;
* prior systemic treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer;
* \<=6 months since last adjuvant chemotherapy;
* other malignancies within last 5 years, except for adequately treated cancer in situ of the cervix, or basal or squamous cell skin cancer.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

San Juan Bautista, , Argentina

Site Status

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Site Status

Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Ballarat, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Frankston, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Hillerød, , Denmark

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Brest, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Esslingen am Neckar, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hamm, , Germany

Site Status

Kaiserslautern, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mönchengladbach, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Saarbrücken, , Germany

Site Status

Trier, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Heraklion, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Ẕerifin, , Israel

Site Status

Chieti, Abruzzo, Italy

Site Status

San Giovanni Rotondo, Apulia, Italy

Site Status

Napoli, Campania, Italy

Site Status

Pordenone, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy

Site Status

Udine, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy

Site Status

Orbassano, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Florence, Tuscany, Italy

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Distrito Federal, , Mexico

Site Status

Gliwice, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Sibiu, , Romania

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Kamenitz, , Serbia

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Salisbury, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Croatia Denmark France Germany Greece Hong Kong Israel Italy Lithuania Mexico Poland Romania Serbia Singapore Spain Taiwan United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2007-003751-37

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BO21128

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.