Safety and Efficacy Study of Gemcitabine-erlotinib Versus Gemcitabine-erlotinib-capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01303029

Last Updated: 2017-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine-erlotinib versus gemcitabine-erlotinib-capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Gemcitabine+erlotinib

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Gemcitabine+erlotinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, 15. Erlotinib will be administered orally at a dose of 100 mg daily from day 1 to day 28, repeated every 4 weeks .

Experimental

Gemcitabine+erlotinib+capecitabine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gemcitabine+erlotinib+capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, 15. Capecitabine will be administered orally 1.660 mg/m2 day from day 1 to day 21. Erlotinib will be administered orally at a dose of 100 mg daily from day 1 to day 28, repeated every 4 weeks .

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gemcitabine+erlotinib

Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, 15. Erlotinib will be administered orally at a dose of 100 mg daily from day 1 to day 28, repeated every 4 weeks .

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine+erlotinib+capecitabine

Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, 15. Capecitabine will be administered orally 1.660 mg/m2 day from day 1 to day 21. Erlotinib will be administered orally at a dose of 100 mg daily from day 1 to day 28, repeated every 4 weeks .

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent
2. Able, in the investigator's opinion, to fulfill the procedures and explorations of the study
3. Age ≥ 18 years old
4. ECOG 0-2
5. Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
6. Patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, following 7th edition of TNM classification
7. Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
8. Measurable disease following RECIST criteria version 1.1
9. No previous systemic treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer Adjuvant chemotherapy al least 6 months before enrollment is allowed. Patients having neoadjuvant chemotherapy must have completed the treatment at least 4 weeks before trial entry. Toxicities associated to previous treatment must be resolved before enrollment. Progression disease (metastatic disease) must be confirmed after adjuvant treatment
10. Adequate bone marrow function as determined by:

* Hemoglobin: ≥ 9 g/dL. (patients with hemoglobin \< 9 g/dL could be transfused before their inclusion on the study)
* Platelets: ≥ 100 x 109/L
* Absolute Neutrophil account (ANC) ≥ 1,5 x 109/L
11. Adequate liver function, as determined by:

* Serum bilirubin ≤ 1,5 x LSN
* AST, ALT ≤ 2,5 x LSN in patients without liver metastasis. In patients with liver metastasis ≤ 5 x LSN
* Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2,5 x LSN or ≤ 5 x LSN in patients with liver metastasis. In patients with bone metastasis ≤ 10 x LSN
12. Adequate renal function, as determined by:

* Creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault formula ≥ 50.0 ml/min
13. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test performed within 7 days prior to randomization. Postmenopausal women are defined as those who have been amenorrheic for at least 12 months. Also, both men and women enrolled in this study must use adequate birth control (eg., abstinence, intrauterine device, oral contraceptive or double barrier method or be surgically sterile), starting at the signing of the informed consent and up to at least 6 months after completion of treatment or the last dose, whichever occurs first
14. Patients must not have undergone a major surgical procedure within 4 weeks prior to study treatment. The surgical wound should be completely healed

Exclusion Criteria

1. Local pancreatic cancer (stage IA-IIB) or locally advance cancer (stage III), following the TNM 7th edition classification. Patients with metastatic disease that relapse after the initial diagnosis of local or advance disease could be included in this study
2. Pancreatic endocrine tumor and ampulloma
3. Evidence of carcinomatosis meningitis or brain metastasis. In case of clinical suspicious of brain metastasis is mandatory to perform a brain TAC/MR 4 weeks prior de inclusion.
4. Primary tumors developed 5 years previous to the inclusion, except in situ cervix carcinoma or skin basocellular cancer properly treated
5. Cardiovascular disease clinically significant (active):

* Non-controlled arterial hypertension (Systolic pressure \> 150 mg Hg and/or diastolic pressure \> 100 mm Hg on repeated pressure measurements)
* Cerebrovascular accident/ictus (≤ 6 weeks prior to inclusion)
* Myocardial infarction (≤ 6 months prior to inclusion)
* Unstable angina
* Congestive cardiac insufficiency (grade II or superior following to New York Heart Association (NYHA)
* Severe cardiac arrythmia requiring treatment
6. Significant ophthalmologic anomalies
7. Deficit in Dihydropyrimidine-Dehydrogenase (DPD)
8. Unable to take oral drug. Previous surgical process that affect the absorption or make the needed to have intravenous feeding or parenteral nutrition with lipids
9. Pregnancy women or in lactation period
10. Antineoplastic treatment (chemotherapy, hormonal treatment, radiotherapy, surgery, biological therapy or tumor embolization) 4 weeks prior the inclusion
11. Previous treatment with capecitabine or EGFR inhibitor
12. Metabolic disease or any other disease which, in the investigator's opinion, might interfere with the treatment in study
13. Known hypersensibility to any study drug (gemcitabine, erlotinib, capecitabine) or to 5-fluorouracile and fluoropyrimidines
14. Current infection grade ≥ 2 (CTCAE)
15. Known human immunodeficiency virus infection, or chronic infection with hepatitis B or C virus, or severe uncontrolled intercurrent infection or other severe uncontrolled concomitant diseases
16. Medical, psychological, psychiatric or sociological conditions that would interfere to the patient participation in the study or in the assessment of the results
17. Current or 30 days previous to study treatment with other investigational drug or participation in other trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antonio Irigoyen, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hospital de Toledo, Spain

Manuel Benavides, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hospital Carlos Haya, Málaga. Spain

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Spanish Cooperative Group for Digestive Tumour Therapy

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Irigoyen A, Gallego J, Guillen Ponce C, Vera R, Iranzo V, Ales I, Arevalo S, Pisa A, Martin M, Salud A, Falco E, Saenz A, Manzano Mozo JL, Pulido G, Martinez Galan J, Pazo-Cid R, Rivera F, Garcia Garcia T, Serra O, Fernandez Parra EM, Hurtado A, Gomez Reina MJ, Lopez Gomez LJ, Martinez Ortega E, Benavides M, Aranda E; Spanish Cooperative Group of Treatment of Digestive Tumors (TTD). Gemcitabine-erlotinib versus gemcitabine-erlotinib-capecitabine in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Efficacy and safety results of a phase IIb randomised study from the Spanish TTD Collaborative Group. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Apr;75:73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.032. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28222309 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-022599-30

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TTD-10-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.