A Study to Compare the Glycemic Effects, Safety, and Tolerability of Exenatide Once Weekly to Those of Sitagliptin and Pioglitazone,in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin (DURATION - 2)

NCT ID: NCT00637273

Last Updated: 2015-04-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

514 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2009-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the benefits of exenatide once weekly treatment to those achieved by the approved antidiabetic therapies sitagliptin and pioglitazone in subjects whose type 2 diabetes is managed with metformin therapy alone. The safety and tolerability of the three treatment regimens will also be compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

exenatide once weekly

Intervention Type DRUG

subcutaneous injection, 2.0mg, once a week

placebo tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

oral tablet, once a day

2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

sitagliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

oral tablet, 100mg, once a day

placebo once weekly

Intervention Type DRUG

subcutaneous injection, once a week

3

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

oral tablet, 45mg, once a day

placebo once weekly

Intervention Type DRUG

subcutaneous injection, once a week

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

exenatide once weekly

subcutaneous injection, 2.0mg, once a week

Intervention Type DRUG

sitagliptin

oral tablet, 100mg, once a day

Intervention Type DRUG

pioglitazone

oral tablet, 45mg, once a day

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo tablet

oral tablet, once a day

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo once weekly

subcutaneous injection, once a week

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Januvia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Has been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
* Has a hemoglobin-specific A1c fraction (HbA1c) of 7.1% to 11.0%, inclusive, at study start
* Has a body mass index (BMI)of 25 kg/m2 to 45 kg/m2, inclusive, at study start
* Has been on a stable treatment regimen of metformin for a minimum of 2 months prior to study start
* Either is not treated with or has been on a stable treatment regimen with any of the following medications for a minimum of 2 months prior to study start:

1. Hormone replacement therapy (female subjects)
2. Oral contraceptives (female subjects)
3. Antihypertensive agents
4. Lipid-lowering agents
5. Thyroid replacement therapy
6. Antidepressant agents
7. Drugs known to affect body weight, including prescription medications (e.g. orlistat \[XENICAL®\], sibutramine \[MERIDIA®\], topiramate \[TOPAMAX®\]) and over-the-counter antiobesity agents

Exclusion Criteria

* Has been previously exposed to exenatide once weekly
* Has donated blood within 60 days of study start or is planning to donate blood during the study
* Currently being treated, or is expected to require or undergo treatment with any of the following treatment-excluded medications:

1. Exenatide (BYETTA®) or any Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 DPP-4)inhibitor, sulfonylurea (SU), thiazolidinedione (TZD), or glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 analog within 3 months prior to study start
2. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, meglitinide, nateglinide, or pramlintide (SYMLIN®) within 30 days of study start
3. Insulin within 2 weeks of study start or for more than 1 week within 3 months of study start
4. Systemic corticosteroids by oral, intravenous, or intramuscular route; or potent, inhaled, or intrapulmonary (including ADVAIR®) steroids known to have a high rate of systemic absorption
5. Drugs interacting with the CYP2C8 enzyme system, including gemfibrozil (LOPID®) and rifampin
* Has received any investigational drug within 1 month (or five half-lives of investigational drug, whichever is greater) of study start
* Has previously experienced a clinically significant adverse event (e.g., significant edema) related to TZD or DPP-4 inhibitor use
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eli Lilly and Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lisa Porter, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Peoria, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Artesia, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Concord, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Encino, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greenbrae, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Melbourne, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Avon, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oxon Hill, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chelsea, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Windsor, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Statesville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Olympia, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Research Site

Indore, , India

Site Status

Research Site

Karnāl, , India

Site Status

Research Site

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

Research Site

Pune, , India

Site Status

Research Site

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Monterrey, NuevoLeon, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Toluca, State of Mexico, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States India Mexico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Guja C, Frias JP, Suchower L, Hardy E, Marr G, Sjostrom CD, Jabbour SA. Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once Weekly in Participants with Type 2 Diabetes and Stage 2/3 Chronic Kidney Disease. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jul;11(7):1467-1480. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00815-z. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32306296 (View on PubMed)

Malloy J, Meloni A, Han J. Efficacy and tolerability of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective analysis of pooled clinical trial data. Postgrad Med. 2013 May;125(3):58-67. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.05.2661.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23748507 (View on PubMed)

Grimm M, Han J, Weaver C, Griffin P, Schulteis CT, Dong H, Malloy J. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an integrated analysis of the DURATION trials. Postgrad Med. 2013 May;125(3):47-57. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.05.2660.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23748506 (View on PubMed)

Meloni AR, DeYoung MB, Han J, Best JH, Grimm M. Treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes with exenatide once weekly versus oral glucose-lowering medications or insulin glargine: achievement of glycemic and cardiovascular goals. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Mar 23;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-48.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23522121 (View on PubMed)

Peyrot M, Bushnell DM, Best JH, Martin ML, Cameron A, Patrick DL. Development and validation of the self-management profile for type 2 diabetes (SMP-T2D). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Oct 5;10:125. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-125.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23039868 (View on PubMed)

Fineman MS, Mace KF, Diamant M, Darsow T, Cirincione BB, Booker Porter TK, Kinninger LA, Trautmann ME. Clinical relevance of anti-exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross-reactivity with long-term treatment. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Jun;14(6):546-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01561.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22236356 (View on PubMed)

Wysham C, Bergenstal R, Malloy J, Yan P, Walsh B, Malone J, Taylor K. DURATION-2: efficacy and safety of switching from maximum daily sitagliptin or pioglitazone to once-weekly exenatide. Diabet Med. 2011 Jun;28(6):705-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03301.x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21434995 (View on PubMed)

Bergenstal RM, Wysham C, Macconell L, Malloy J, Walsh B, Yan P, Wilhelm K, Malone J, Porter LE; DURATION-2 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Aug 7;376(9739):431-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60590-9. Epub 2010 Jun 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20580422 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BCB106 (DURATION - 2)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.