Role of Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) Device in Postoperative Management of Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures

NCT ID: NCT00635479

Last Updated: 2017-12-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

115 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research is to study the efficacy and cost effectiveness of the VAC device in comparison to traditional gauze wound dressing in pelvic, acetabular and hip fractures, specifically to see if there is a reduction in the incidence of post operative surgical wound drainage, infections, and hospital stay.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Soft tissue injuries are commonly associated with pelvic and acetabular injuries and additional tissue injury occurs during surgery. Post operative wound drainage, infections and prolonged hospital stay are a common problem during postoperative care. Traditional treatment is dressing of the surgical wound with different conventional dressings.

Use of negative pressure wound therapy has been shown to be beneficial in significantly decreasing wound drainage. Stannard et al. reported the results of randomizing 44 patients with lower extremity fractures (including 4 pilon fractures) into either receiving standard post operative dressing versus NPWT (negative pressure wound therapy). His results showed no difference in infection rate or wound breakdown, but did show a significant difference in the drainage time. The NPWT group stopped draining 3 days earlier than the standard dressing group. The use of NPWT has greatly increased over the years and has been an important adjunct to wound management. These results and anecdotal clinical experience with the use of NPWT (wound VAC) has led us to develop our research question; Does the use of incisional VAC following pelvic \&/or acetabular surgery decrease wound complications.

The VAC (KCI USA) device is relatively new device that utilizes negative pressure as a treatment modality for soft tissue injuries following high velocity injuries. VAC device exerts intermittent or constant negative pressure and removes excess fluid from the interstitial space and increases perfusion through vessels. Previous VAC studies showed decreased bacterial load after applying VAC device to the infected wounds.

There have been no randomized studies to prove the cost effectiveness and efficacy of VAC device in reducing wound drainage, infections, and prolonged hospital stays in comparison to traditional gauze dressing wound management during post operative management of pelvic and acetabular fractures.

In examining the incidence of wound complications/infections, we can determine if the incisional VAC decreases the need for additional intervention and if there are any patient related factors (i.e. obesity) related to increased risk of wound complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Fractures Acetabular Fractures Hip Fractures

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Fractures Pelvic bones Acetabulum Hip bones

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

VAC Device placement

will have the VAC device used for post-operative management of acetabular fractures and pelvic fractures.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

VAC device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) device for surgical incision

Gauze dressing

will receive current traditional surgical wound management with daily dressing changes in post operative management of acetabular fractures and pelvic fractures.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Gauze dressing

Intervention Type OTHER

Gauze dressing for surgical incision

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

VAC device

Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) device for surgical incision

Intervention Type DEVICE

Gauze dressing

Gauze dressing for surgical incision

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Wound Vac Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) Incisional Vac

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older
* Scheduled for surgical repair of pelvic and/or acetabular fracture
* Subject/guardian able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Less than 18 years of age
* Subject/guardian unable to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Davis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical College of Wisconsin

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Missouri-Columbia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Brett Crist

Assistant Professor, Co-Director of Trauma Services, Co-Director Trauma Fellowship, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brett D Crist, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Missouri-Columbia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Missouri

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1138438

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IRB 1096320

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id