Role of Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) Device in Postoperative Management of Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures
NCT ID: NCT00635479
Last Updated: 2017-12-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
115 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-03-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Use of negative pressure wound therapy has been shown to be beneficial in significantly decreasing wound drainage. Stannard et al. reported the results of randomizing 44 patients with lower extremity fractures (including 4 pilon fractures) into either receiving standard post operative dressing versus NPWT (negative pressure wound therapy). His results showed no difference in infection rate or wound breakdown, but did show a significant difference in the drainage time. The NPWT group stopped draining 3 days earlier than the standard dressing group. The use of NPWT has greatly increased over the years and has been an important adjunct to wound management. These results and anecdotal clinical experience with the use of NPWT (wound VAC) has led us to develop our research question; Does the use of incisional VAC following pelvic \&/or acetabular surgery decrease wound complications.
The VAC (KCI USA) device is relatively new device that utilizes negative pressure as a treatment modality for soft tissue injuries following high velocity injuries. VAC device exerts intermittent or constant negative pressure and removes excess fluid from the interstitial space and increases perfusion through vessels. Previous VAC studies showed decreased bacterial load after applying VAC device to the infected wounds.
There have been no randomized studies to prove the cost effectiveness and efficacy of VAC device in reducing wound drainage, infections, and prolonged hospital stays in comparison to traditional gauze dressing wound management during post operative management of pelvic and acetabular fractures.
In examining the incidence of wound complications/infections, we can determine if the incisional VAC decreases the need for additional intervention and if there are any patient related factors (i.e. obesity) related to increased risk of wound complications.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
VAC Device placement
will have the VAC device used for post-operative management of acetabular fractures and pelvic fractures.
VAC device
Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) device for surgical incision
Gauze dressing
will receive current traditional surgical wound management with daily dressing changes in post operative management of acetabular fractures and pelvic fractures.
Gauze dressing
Gauze dressing for surgical incision
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
VAC device
Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) device for surgical incision
Gauze dressing
Gauze dressing for surgical incision
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for surgical repair of pelvic and/or acetabular fracture
* Subject/guardian able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject/guardian unable to provide informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Davis
OTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
OTHER
University of Missouri-Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Brett Crist
Assistant Professor, Co-Director of Trauma Services, Co-Director Trauma Fellowship, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brett D Crist, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Missouri-Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1138438
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB 1096320
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id