Efficacy and Safety of Concentration-controlled Everolimus to Eliminate or to Reduce Tacrolimus Compared to Tacrolimus in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients

NCT ID: NCT00622869

Last Updated: 2013-05-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

719 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This trial was designed to address important issues that impact recipients of liver allografts as well as clinicians, ie, renal function, reduction or discontinuation of tacrolimus early post-transplantation, and progression rate of fibrosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This 24-month study consisted of a screening period, a baseline period (3 to 7 days post-transplantation) followed by a run-in period that ended on the day of randomization at 30 days (± 5 days) post-transplantation. Patients were screened for eligibility prior to liver transplantation. Patients who had undergone successful liver transplantation were initiated on a tacrolimus-based regimen that included corticosteroids and entered the baseline period (between 3 and 7 days post-transplantation). At 30 (± 5) days post-transplantation, patients who met additional randomization inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomized into the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver Transplantation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Everolimus + reduced tacrolimus

Low dose tacrolimus (tacrolimus reduced) + everolimus + corticosteroids.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus)

Intervention Type DRUG

After everolimus whole blood trough levels were confirmed to be in the target range of 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus tapering began, achieving a target tacrolimus whole blood trough level of 3-5 ng/mL by 3 weeks after randomization, a level which was maintained for the duration of the study.

Everolimus (reduced tacrolimus)

Intervention Type DRUG

Everolimus was started within 24 hours of randomization at a dose of 1.0 mg twice a day (bid, 2 mg daily dose). The dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 3-8 ng/mL for the duration of the study.

Corticosteroids

Intervention Type DRUG

For patients in all groups, corticosteroids were initiated at or prior to the time of transplantation according to local practice. Corticosteroids could be used for the duration of the study but could not be eliminated before Month 6.

Tacrolimus elimination

Low-dose tacrolimus (until Month 4, then tacrolimus eliminated) + everolimus + corticosteroids.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tacrolimus (tacrolimus elimination)

Intervention Type DRUG

After everolimus whole blood trough levels were confirmed to be in the target range of 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus tapering began, achieving a target tacrolimus whole blood trough level of 3-5 ng/mL by 3 weeks after randomization. Tacrolimus elimination was started beginning at Month 4. Tacrolimus was tapered after everolimus whole blood trough levels were within the target range of 6-10 ng/mL. Tacrolimus was completely eliminated by the end of Month 4.

Everolimus (tacrolimus elimination)

Intervention Type DRUG

Everolimus was started within 24 hours of randomization at a dose of 1.0 mg twice a day (bid, 2 mg daily dose). The dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 3-8 ng/mL until Month 4; beginning with Month 4, the dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 6-10 ng/mL.

Corticosteroids

Intervention Type DRUG

For patients in all groups, corticosteroids were initiated at or prior to the time of transplantation according to local practice. Corticosteroids could be used for the duration of the study but could not be eliminated before Month 6.

Tacrolimus control

Control dose tacrolimus + corticosteroids.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tacrolimus (tacrolimus control)

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus trough levels were targeted to be maintained at 8-12 ng/mL until Month 4. At Month 4, tacrolimus whole blood trough levels were decreased to a target trough level of 6-10 ng/mL for the remainder of the study.

Corticosteroids

Intervention Type DRUG

For patients in all groups, corticosteroids were initiated at or prior to the time of transplantation according to local practice. Corticosteroids could be used for the duration of the study but could not be eliminated before Month 6.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus)

After everolimus whole blood trough levels were confirmed to be in the target range of 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus tapering began, achieving a target tacrolimus whole blood trough level of 3-5 ng/mL by 3 weeks after randomization, a level which was maintained for the duration of the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus (tacrolimus elimination)

After everolimus whole blood trough levels were confirmed to be in the target range of 3-8 ng/mL, tacrolimus tapering began, achieving a target tacrolimus whole blood trough level of 3-5 ng/mL by 3 weeks after randomization. Tacrolimus elimination was started beginning at Month 4. Tacrolimus was tapered after everolimus whole blood trough levels were within the target range of 6-10 ng/mL. Tacrolimus was completely eliminated by the end of Month 4.

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus (tacrolimus control)

Tacrolimus trough levels were targeted to be maintained at 8-12 ng/mL until Month 4. At Month 4, tacrolimus whole blood trough levels were decreased to a target trough level of 6-10 ng/mL for the remainder of the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Everolimus (reduced tacrolimus)

Everolimus was started within 24 hours of randomization at a dose of 1.0 mg twice a day (bid, 2 mg daily dose). The dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 3-8 ng/mL for the duration of the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Everolimus (tacrolimus elimination)

Everolimus was started within 24 hours of randomization at a dose of 1.0 mg twice a day (bid, 2 mg daily dose). The dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 3-8 ng/mL until Month 4; beginning with Month 4, the dose was adjusted to maintain everolimus trough blood levels between 6-10 ng/mL.

Intervention Type DRUG

Corticosteroids

For patients in all groups, corticosteroids were initiated at or prior to the time of transplantation according to local practice. Corticosteroids could be used for the duration of the study but could not be eliminated before Month 6.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

FK-506 fujimycin Prograf Advagraf Protopic FK-506 fujimycin Prograf Advagraf Protopic FK-506 fujimycin Prograf Advagraf Protopic RAD-001 Zortress Certican Afinitor RAD-001 Zortress Certican Afinitor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and adhere to study regimen.
* Recipients who are 18-70 years of age of a primary liver transplant from a deceased donor.
* Recipients who have been initiated on an immunosuppressive regimen that contains corticosteroids and tacrolimus, 3-7 days post-transplantation.
* Confirmed recipient hepatitis C virus (HCV) status at Screening (either by antibody or by PCR (polymerase chain reaction).
* Allograft is functioning at an acceptable level by the time of randomization as defined by protocol specific laboratory values.
* Abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease estimated glomerular filtration rate (MDRD eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73m2. Results obtained within 5 days prior to randomization are acceptable, however, no sooner than Day 25 post-transplantation.
* Verification of at least 1 tacrolimus trough level of ≥ 8 ng/mL in the week prior to randomization. Investigators should make adjustments in tacrolimus dosing to continue to target trough levels above 8 ng/mL prior to randomization.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who are recipients of multiple solid organ or islet cell tissue transplants, or have previously received an organ or tissue transplant. Patients who have a combined liver-kidney transplant.
* Recipients of a liver from a living donor, or of a split liver.
* History of malignancy of any organ system within the past 5 years whether or not there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases, other than non-metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) (see next criteria).
* Hepatocellular carcinoma that does not fulfill Milan criteria (1 nodule ≤ 5 cm, 2-3 nodules all \< 3 cm) at the time of transplantation as per explant histology of the recipient liver.
* Any use of antibody induction therapy.
* Patients with a known hypersensitivity to the drugs used on study or their class, or to any of the excipients.
* Patients who are recipients of ABO incompatible transplant grafts.
* Recipients of organs from donors who test positive for Hepatitis B surface antigen or HIV are excluded.
* Patients who have any surgical or medical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator, might significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of study drug.
* Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP).
* Patients with any history of coagulopathy or medical condition requiring long-term anticoagulation which would preclude liver biopsy after transplantation. (Low dose aspirin treatment or interruption of chronic anticoagulant is allowed).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Blumenau, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cali, , Colombia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Medellín, , Colombia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Prague, Czech Republic, Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lille, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, Germany, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mainz, Germany, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Dublin, Ireland, Ireland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pisa, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Modena, MO, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Roma, RM, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Torino, TO, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barakaldo, Basque Country, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Majadanonda, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pamplona, Navarre, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Belgium Brazil Canada Colombia Czechia France Germany Hungary Ireland Israel Italy Netherlands Russia Spain Sweden United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Charlton M, Rinella M, Patel D, McCague K, Heimbach J, Watt K. Everolimus Is Associated With Less Weight Gain Than Tacrolimus 2 Years After Liver Transplantation: Results of a Randomized Multicenter Study. Transplantation. 2017 Dec;101(12):2873-2882. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001913.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28817434 (View on PubMed)

Fischer L, Saliba F, Kaiser GM, De Carlis L, Metselaar HJ, De Simone P, Duvoux C, Nevens F, Fung JJ, Dong G, Rauer B, Junge G; H2304 Study Group. Three-year Outcomes in De Novo Liver Transplant Patients Receiving Everolimus With Reduced Tacrolimus: Follow-Up Results From a Randomized, Multicenter Study. Transplantation. 2015 Jul;99(7):1455-62. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000555.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26151607 (View on PubMed)

Saliba F, De Simone P, Nevens F, De Carlis L, Metselaar HJ, Beckebaum S, Jonas S, Sudan D, Fischer L, Duvoux C, Chavin KD, Koneru B, Huang MA, Chapman WC, Foltys D, Dong G, Lopez PM, Fung J, Junge G; H2304 Study Group. Renal function at two years in liver transplant patients receiving everolimus: results of a randomized, multicenter study. Am J Transplant. 2013 Jul;13(7):1734-45. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12280. Epub 2013 May 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23714399 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2007-001821-85

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CRAD001H2304

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

EVR and EPO for Liver Transplant Tolerance
NCT06832189 RECRUITING PHASE1