General Surgical Outcomes Quality Improvement Database (UH-SOCRATES)
NCT ID: NCT00622557
Last Updated: 2022-05-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
200000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-05-01
2017-01-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Specifically, the purpose of the database will be used as a quality improvement tool for analyzing process and outcome measures and to accurately track cases performed by surgeons.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lower Urinary Tract and Sexual Function in Women Following Surgery for Colorectal Disorders
NCT00667550
Prognostic Factors and Oncological Outcomes in Laparoscopic Liver Resection for CRLM
NCT05036265
Surgical and Oncological Outcomes in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis-associated Rectal Cancer
NCT04659148
Follow-Up Phone Calls After Colorectal Surgery
NCT00474097
Care Pathways for Colorectal Cancer Surgery
NCT02965794
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For this reason, programs such as NSQIP (the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project) have been brought from the VA system into private and academic healthcare systems, to sample surgical outcomes and provide hospitals with benchmarks that can be achieved, as well as informing them where they rank in the overall results. Unfortunately, systems such as NSQIP are based on sampling a percentage of cases performed each week, but do not track all cases or all providers. Many cases are therefore not tracked in any way.
Certain centers have now established databases to track their own surgical outcomes. These are usually specific to certain surgical specialties, and provide an opportunity to perform quality improvement. These also have the added value of being useful tools for maintenance of certification and for clinical research.
Primary goals of this study:
We propose to further develop the General Surgical Outcomes Quality Improvement Database(GSOD)-subsequently renamed UH-SOCRATES-which will track all surgical, medical, and radiological encounters occurring at University Hospitals Case Medical Center(UHCMC)as well as at UH's Richmond and Geauga campuses. This database will have several goals:
1. UH-SOCRATES will be used as a quality improvement tool for analyzing process and outcome measures, for example being able to evaluate patients with prolonged length of stay so that cases can be defined and evaluated for specific risk factors or in-hospital events.
2. By using hospital coded CPT codes, UH-SOCRATES will be able to accurately track cases performed by surgeons for maintenance of certification purposes.
All of these goals are related to quality improvement and assessment, and are considered "not human subjects research" under 45 CFR 46. In the future it is hoped that UH-SOCRATES will also be a powerful resource for formal research into surgical outcomes. Future IRB submissions will be submitted for this purpose. This IRB submission therefore only addresses the quality improvement perspective of the UH-SOCRATES.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Surgical
All patients having surgery procedures
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
14 Years
95 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Conor P. Delaney, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
04-07-18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.