General Surgical Outcomes Quality Improvement Database (UH-SOCRATES)

NCT ID: NCT00622557

Last Updated: 2022-05-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

200000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-05-01

Study Completion Date

2017-01-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A database has been established to track the outcomes of all cases performed in the University Hospitals Department of Surgery in an effort to improve quality of surgical performance and case management.

Specifically, the purpose of the database will be used as a quality improvement tool for analyzing process and outcome measures and to accurately track cases performed by surgeons.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Since the Institute of Medicine report, titled "To Err is Human", there has been an increasing trend to evaluate outcomes in healthcare. While optimal outcomes in delivery of healthcare are something that hospitals and their medical, nursing and administrative staff have always tried to achieve, this has often been attempted without having much information to assess the outcomes that actually occur.

For this reason, programs such as NSQIP (the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project) have been brought from the VA system into private and academic healthcare systems, to sample surgical outcomes and provide hospitals with benchmarks that can be achieved, as well as informing them where they rank in the overall results. Unfortunately, systems such as NSQIP are based on sampling a percentage of cases performed each week, but do not track all cases or all providers. Many cases are therefore not tracked in any way.

Certain centers have now established databases to track their own surgical outcomes. These are usually specific to certain surgical specialties, and provide an opportunity to perform quality improvement. These also have the added value of being useful tools for maintenance of certification and for clinical research.

Primary goals of this study:

We propose to further develop the General Surgical Outcomes Quality Improvement Database(GSOD)-subsequently renamed UH-SOCRATES-which will track all surgical, medical, and radiological encounters occurring at University Hospitals Case Medical Center(UHCMC)as well as at UH's Richmond and Geauga campuses. This database will have several goals:

1. UH-SOCRATES will be used as a quality improvement tool for analyzing process and outcome measures, for example being able to evaluate patients with prolonged length of stay so that cases can be defined and evaluated for specific risk factors or in-hospital events.
2. By using hospital coded CPT codes, UH-SOCRATES will be able to accurately track cases performed by surgeons for maintenance of certification purposes.

All of these goals are related to quality improvement and assessment, and are considered "not human subjects research" under 45 CFR 46. In the future it is hoped that UH-SOCRATES will also be a powerful resource for formal research into surgical outcomes. Future IRB submissions will be submitted for this purpose. This IRB submission therefore only addresses the quality improvement perspective of the UH-SOCRATES.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colon Cancer Diverticulitis Colorectal Polyps Crohn's Disease Ulcerative Colitis Rectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgical

All patients having surgery procedures

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients receiving surgical,medical,or radiological services at University Hospitals Case Medical Center,Richmond,or Geauga campuses.

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Conor P. Delaney, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospitals Case Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04-07-18

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.