A Clinical Study in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain From PHN Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Gabapentin Treatment
NCT ID: NCT00617461
Last Updated: 2013-07-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
96 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-03-31
2009-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study In Patients With Neuropathic Pain From Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)
NCT00619476
Safety and Efficacy of Gabapentin in Postherpetic Neuralgia
NCT00636636
A Study In Patients With Neuropathic Pain From Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
NCT00643760
Safety and Efficacy of Gabapentin in Postherpetic Neuralgia
NCT00335933
Dose-Response and Pharmacokinetics of Gabapentin Enacarbil (GEn [XP13512 / GSK1838262]) in Restless Legs Syndrome
NCT01332305
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects are treated with gabapentin 1800mg/day during the Baseline Period and are randomized if during the Basleline Period they are compliant with gabapentin treatment and have a 24-hour average pain intensity score ≥4.0 based on an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS). Subjects are then randomized to receive gabapentin enacarbil (either 1200mg/day or 3600mg/day in a 1:1 ratio) for Treatment Period 1 (28 days). Followed by a dose of 2400mg/day for 4 days and the alternate fixed dose (either 3600 mg/day or 1200 mg/day) for Treatment Period 2 (28 days).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GEn 1200mg/day
gabapentin enacarbil 1200mg/day, 4 weeks treatment in either the first or second treatment period
GEn 1200mg/day
1200mg/day gabapentin enacarbil
GEn 3600mg/day
gabapentin enacarbil 3600mg/day, 4 weeks treatment in either the first or second treatment period
GEn 3600mg/day
3600mg/day gabapentin enacarbil
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GEn 1200mg/day
1200mg/day gabapentin enacarbil
GEn 3600mg/day
3600mg/day gabapentin enacarbil
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Documented medical diagnosis of PHN with pain present for at least 3 months from the healing of a herpes zoster rash
* Female subjects are eligible if of non-childbearing potential or not lactating, has a negative pregnancy, and agrees to use one a specified highly effective method for avoiding pregnancy.
* Currently on a stable dose of 1800 mg/day of gabapentin for ≥2 weeks with inadequate response OR
* Not currently treated with gabapentin, but previously treated with ≥1800 mg/day of gabapentin for 4 weeks or more with inadequate response.
* Baseline 24-hour average pain intensity score ≥ 4.0 based on an 11-point PI-NRS
* Provides written informed consent in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements
Exclusion Criteria
* The pain is located at a different region of the body; and
* The pain intensity is not greater than the pain intensity of the PHN; and
* The subject can assess PHN pain independently of other pain
* Is unable to discontinue prohibited medications or non-drug therapies or procedures throughout the duration of the study
* Hepatic impairment defined as ALT or AST \> 2x upper limit of normal (ULN), or alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin \> 1.5x ULN
* Chronic hepatitis B or C
* Impaired renal function defined as creatinine clearance \<60 mL/min or requiring hemodialysis
* Corrected QT (QTc) interval ≥ 450 msec or QTc interval ≥480 msec for patients with Bundle Branch Block
* Uncontrolled hypertension at screen (sitting systolic \>160 mmHg and/or sitting diastolic \>90 mmHg)
* Current diagnosis of active epilepsy or any active seizure disorder requiring chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs
* Medical condition or disorder that would interfere with the action, absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of GEn, or, in the investigator's judgment
* Is considered to be clinically significant and may pose a safety concern, or,
* Could interfere with the accurate assessment of safety or efficacy, or,
* Could potentially affect a subject's safety or study outcome
* Current or chronic history of liver disease (including acute viral hepatitis), or known hepatic or biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones).
* Meets criteria defined by the DSM-IV-TR for a major depressive episode or for active significant psychiatric disorders within last year
* Depression in remission, with or without antidepressant treatment, may participate, unless stable antidepressant regimen is a prohibited medication
* Antidepressant medication may not be changed or discontinued to meet entry criteria and must be stable for at least three months prior to enrollment
* History of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse (DSM-IV-TR) or is unable to refrain from substance abuse throughout the study. Benzodiazepines or atypical benzodiazepines as hypnotic sleep agents permitted.
* Currently participating in another clinical study in which the subject is, or will be exposed to an investigational or non-investigational drug or device
* Has participated in a clinical study and was exposed to investigational or non-investigational drug or device:
* Within preceding month for studies unrelated to PHN, or
* Within preceding six months for studies related to PHN
* Treated previously with GEn
* History of allergic or medically significant adverse reaction to investigational products (including gabapentin) or their excipients, acetaminophen or related compounds
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
XenoPort, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GSK Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
GlaxoSmithKline
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GSK Investigational Site
Greensburg, Pennsylvania, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Oxnard, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Roseville, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
San Francisco, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Bradenton, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chipley, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Gainesville, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Marianna, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Miami Springs, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Naranja, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
South Miami, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Decatur, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Marietta, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Terre Haute, Indiana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Missoula, Montana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Norman, Oklahoma, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Medford, Oregon, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Longview, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Weber City, Virginia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Yakima, Washington, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Schönau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Hüttenberg, Hesse, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Wiesbaden, Hesse, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Achim, Lower Saxony, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Hattingen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzg, Saxony, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Harden RN, Freeman R, Rainka M, Zhang L, Bell C, Berges A, Chen C, Graff O, Harding K, Hunter S, Kavanagh S, Schwartzbach C, Warren S, McClung C. A phase 2a, randomized, crossover trial of gabapentin enacarbil for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in gabapentin inadequate responders. Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14(12):1918-32. doi: 10.1111/pme.12227. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
110527
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.