Neptune Pad ® Compared to Conventional Manual Compression
NCT ID: NCT00597363
Last Updated: 2008-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
201 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-01-31
2008-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
METHODS. We enrolled 201 consecutive patients and randomly assigned patients for Neptune Pad ® (n=100) vs. conventional manual compression (n=101). Patients were followed clinically until hospital discharge and by duplex ultrasound at 24 hours postprocedure for occurrence of access site complications. Time-to-hemostasis and time-to-ambulation were recorded, patients´ and physicians´ discomfort were measured using a visual analogue scale.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Umbilical Venous Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Neonates: A Prospective Cohort Study of Complications, Catheter Survival, and CLABSI"
NCT07209670
Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
NCT01356459
Incidences of Cuff-related Trauma After Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement Between With and Without Padding
NCT02614976
Interest of Peripheral Venous Catheter Insertion Using a Micro-guide in Neonatology
NCT04984967
Sequential Compression Device (SCD) for Stabilizing Hemodynamics in the Beach Chair Position
NCT01680393
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Neptune PAD utilization to accelerate closure of the vascular access site
Neptune P.A.D. (R)
The Neptune Pad ® (Biotronik GmbH \& Co. KG, Berlin, Germany) is a soft and hydrophilic wound dressing, which has been developed to accelerate local hemostasis, reduce compression times, enable early ambulation and minimize the risk for bleeding complications. Neptune Pad ® consists of calcium alginate, which is cationically charged and exerts potent procoagulant properties.
2
manual compression for closure of the vascular access site
conventional manual compression
The most common technique for puncture site management is manual compression. This technique requires an extended pressure on the puncture site, and after achievement of hemostasis a pressure bandage is applied for several hours at bed rest.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neptune P.A.D. (R)
The Neptune Pad ® (Biotronik GmbH \& Co. KG, Berlin, Germany) is a soft and hydrophilic wound dressing, which has been developed to accelerate local hemostasis, reduce compression times, enable early ambulation and minimize the risk for bleeding complications. Neptune Pad ® consists of calcium alginate, which is cationically charged and exerts potent procoagulant properties.
conventional manual compression
The most common technique for puncture site management is manual compression. This technique requires an extended pressure on the puncture site, and after achievement of hemostasis a pressure bandage is applied for several hours at bed rest.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No specific limitations of anti-platelet or anti-coagulant medication were specified.
Exclusion Criteria
* Furthermore, patients with known hypersensitivity to components of the device were not eligible
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vienna General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of clinical Angiology, MUW Vienna
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martin Schillinger, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
General Hospital Vienna
Vienna, , Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mlekusch W, Dick P, Haumer M, Sabeti S, Minar E, Schillinger M. Arterial puncture site management after percutaneous transluminal procedures using a hemostatic wound dressing (Clo-Sur P.A.D.) versus conventional manual compression: a randomized controlled trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2006 Feb;13(1):23-31. doi: 10.1583/05-1679.1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EK 433/2004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.