Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-09-30
2008-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Calcium Mass Balance and Dialytic Efficiency of a New cITRate-containing and Acetate-free Dialysis flUidS: CITRUS Study
NCT02848937
Potential Therapeutic Role of Effervescent Calcium-Magnesium Citrate in Chronic Kidney Disease Stage V
NCT03565913
Comparing Alkalinizing Agents Efficacy on Stone Risk in Patients on a Metabolically Controlled Diet
NCT04651088
Calcium Concentration in Bicarbonate Hemodialysis (HD)
NCT01353170
Effectiveness of Urinary Alkalinizing Agents on Kidney Stone Risk
NCT04095975
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Procedures: A total of eight subjects with end-stage renal disease undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis will be recruited. The initial study procedures will be for purposes of screening individuals for the study. The subjects will perform 24-hour collection of urine and dialysate to assess dialysis dose and a peritoneal equilibration test to evaluate the transport properties of the peritoneum. Only those subjects who receive the minimum dialysis dose and have an average peritoneal transport type will enter the study. During this phase, the subjects will maintain a food diary to evaluate dietary preferences and dietary calorie and protein intake. These data will be used to prepare the diets for the subjects when they are admitted to the GCRC. The next two weeks will be used to evaluate the response of arterial pH to the use of the low alkali solution. If, at the end of two weeks, the arterial pH is not in the desired range, the subjects will require ammonium chloride supplementation to achieve the lower pH. In such subjects, ammonium chloride supplementation will be used for all phases of the study.
Qualifying subjects will be hospitalized in the GCRC for 41 days. The entire period of hospitalization will be divided into two equal phases of 20.5 days each: one will be the low pH phase (low alkali dialysis solution with/without ammonium chloride) and the second will be the high pH phase (high alkali dialysis solution with sodium bicarbonate with/without ammonium chloride). Nitrogen balance will be estimated during the entire period of hospitalization. N-intake is a sum of dietary and medicinal intake, while N-output will be N-losses in dialysate, urine and feces. The N-balance will be the difference between N-intake and N-output. The second outcome measure will be leucine turnover studies. Leucine turnover studies will be performed on days 21 and 41. Leucine turnover studies provide information regarding rates of total body protein synthesis and total body protein degradation as well as rates of leucine oxidation. The study will take 10 hours each - the initial 4 hours will be after an overnight fast and the last six hours will be while being fed. The third outcome measure will be the content of some proteins in a sample of muscle biopsy. Muscle biopsy will be performed on days 21 and 41 after the completion of leucine turnover studies. Finally, nutritional assessment will be performed at the time of patient admission, on day 21 and 41. On days 21 and 41, the nutritional assessment will be performed prior to the start of the leucine turnover studies.
The subjects will be compensated for participation in this study -the amount of compensation will be dependent upon the degree of participation of subjects.
Risk-benefit Assessment: The risks of the study include the risks of performing a muscle biopsy, discomfort associated with the placement of the feeding tube, emotional problems associated with prolonged hospitalization in the GCRC and risks associated with venipuncture. There are no direct benefits to the subjects as a result of their participation in this study. However, if we demonstrate that the higher arterial pH is better at preservation of nutritional status, it may have the potential of decreasing the prevalence and/or severity of protein-energy malnutrition in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low normal pH (arterial pH 7.36-7.38)
Ammonium chloride or sodium citrate/citrate acid as needed to achieve the target pH
ammonium chloride or sodium citrate/citric acid
Dose dictated by changes in pH
High Normal pH (arterial pH 7.44-7.46)
High Normal pH (7.44-7.46) with use of increasing doses of sodium bicarbonate up until the desired pH is achieved
Sodium citrate/citratic acid
dictated by pH
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ammonium chloride or sodium citrate/citric acid
Dose dictated by changes in pH
Sodium citrate/citratic acid
dictated by pH
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Treatment with CPD for 6 months and current treatment with APD for at least one month.
3. Hemoglobin of at least 11.0 g/dl.
4. Stable dose of erythropoietin treatment for at least the preceding three months.
5. Subjects with normal nutritional status to mild malnutrition:
1. Serum albumin \> 3.3 g/dl
2. Relative body weight of 90-120% of the NHANES II median body weight for a given height, age range, gender and frame size.
3. A normalized protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance (nPNA) \> 0.80 g/kg actual body weight/day at the time of screening.
6. D/P Cr between 0.48 and 0.81 on the PET performed at the time of the screen.
7. Total (renal + peritoneal) weekly Kt/V urea \> 1.70 and creatinine clearance \> 50 L/wk/1.73 m2.
8. No evidence of primary or secondary (viz., ischemic, neuropathic) myopathy
Exclusion Criteria
2. Symptomatic severe ischemic heart disease, uncontrolled severe dysrhythmias, uncontrolled congestive heart failure, poorly controlled hypertension, severe musculoskeletal disease, arthritis or amputation of the lower extremities.
3. Insulin requiring diabetes mellitus.
4. Patients who received L-carnitine or anabolic hormones (other than erythropoietin) within the previous 6 months.
5. Use of CaCO3 as phosphate binder.
6. Severe lung or liver disease, uncontrolled asthma, active vasculitis.
7. Severe chronic infection or any other acute or chronic inflammatory or catabolic illnesses (e.g., active tuberculosis, AIDS, osteomyelitis).
8. Psychosis, inability to give informed consent, evidence that patient will not comply with study protocol.
9. Alcohol or other recreational drug abuse.
10. Pregnancy (rare in CPD patients).
11. Patients who are physically and/or psychologically incapable of undergoing the protocol.
\-
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rajnish Mehrotra, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute
Torrance, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mehrotra R, Bross R, Wang H, Appell M, Tso L, Kopple JD. Effect of high-normal compared with low-normal arterial pH on protein balances in automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;90(6):1532-40. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28285. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11043
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.