Study of Nutrition in Acute Pancreatitis

NCT ID: NCT00580749

Last Updated: 2016-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We will compare the two types of enteral (intestinal) nutrition in regard to patients with severe acute pancreatitis in our institution and also in 8 others in the United States.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DJ

Naso disal jejunal(DJ) feedings randomized to 50% of subjects meeting criteria.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Naso jejunal feeding tube insertion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placement of feeding tube through nare and into jejunum for administration of enteral feeding.

NG

Placement of naso gastric feeding tube through nare into stomach for enteral feeding.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

NG feeding tube insertion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placement of naso gastric feeding tube into stomach for purpose of enteral feedings.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Naso jejunal feeding tube insertion

Placement of feeding tube through nare and into jejunum for administration of enteral feeding.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

NG feeding tube insertion

Placement of naso gastric feeding tube into stomach for purpose of enteral feedings.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients over the age of 18yr
2. The typical history of abdominal pain for over 24h with raised (\>3-fold) serum pancreatic enzymes on admission
3. Severe pancreatitis, as defined by: the Atlanta classification of severe disease (60), but with important modifications to sharpen the definition of severity, to include one or more of the following:

1. The presence of organ failure (MOF) resistant to early aggressive IV fluid resuscitation as defined by a Marshall score of ≥2 in any one organ (for calculation, see Appendix (61)), excluding the liver component as the abnormality may be due to gall stones rather than the systemic inflammatory response (17)
2. Pancreatic necrosis \>30% on CT scan or a modified CT severity index (CTSI: see Appendix (62)) of ≥8
3. APACHE score ≥ 8 (for calculation, see Appendix (63))
4. Ranson's criteria ≥3 (for calculation, see Appendix (64))

Exclusion Criteria

1. Inability to absorb enteral nutrients resulting in chronic intestinal failure and need for IV feeding, such as short bowel, malabsorption disorders such as celiac or intestinal proliferative disorders, chronic obstruction and pseudo-obstruction.
2. Time elapse since commencement of acute pancreatitis symptoms \>10 days. In order to take advantage of the 'window of opportunity' to prevent the progression of 'transient' MOF to 'permanent' MOF, patients should be started on enteral feeding as soon as possible. However, in practice many patients present initially with mild disease which progresses to severe necrosis at the end of the first week, and these patients need nutritional support for long periods of time. Consequently, this is an important group to include in this investigation. Post hoc analysis will be performed to see whether they behave differently to patients fed earlier in their disease
3. Any form of artificial feeding since commencement of acute pancreatitis symptoms
4. Patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic insufficiency requiring pancreatic enzyme supplements, based on clinical history and specific investigations such as by ERCP, MRP, or CT scanning.
5. Pre-existing chronic renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, as this will make assessment of severity difficult
6. Pre-existing end-stage liver disease with ascites, coagulopathy and encephalopathy, supported by biopsy, and/or radiological imaging and endoscopy (portal hypertension, varices and gastropathy), as this will make assessment of severity difficult
7. Chronic immunodeficiency states such as AIDS defined by CD-4 count \< 50, and immunoglobulin deficiencies as it may independently affect feeding tolerance and infection risk
8. Pancreatic cancer proven by biopsy, and any other form of cancer with life-expectancy \<6 months.
9. Current somatostatin or corticosteroid therapy as these drugs will impair intestinal, metabolic, and immune function, and therefore affect absorption and infection risk.
10. Contraindication to using the nose for enteral tube insertion
11. Severe traumatic brain injury with ICP\>20mmHg despite treatment
12. Previous completion or withdrawal from this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Whitcomb

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Whitcomb, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

University of Florida College of Medicine

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1 R01 DK 075803-01A1 NIH#

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PRO 07080011, PRO 07080044

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Enhanced Recovery in Acute Pancreatitis
NCT02813876 COMPLETED PHASE2
A Prospective Observational Study of TPIAT
NCT03260387 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING