Impact of the Absence of Nasogastric Decompression After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

NCT ID: NCT02594956

Last Updated: 2019-02-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

125 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-12-16

Study Completion Date

2018-12-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The use of nasogastric (NG) decompression after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a current practice. NG tube is associated with a high rate of morbidity including pulmonary morbidity, delayed gastric emptying and finally an increased length of hospital stay.

The absence of NG decompression could be the corner stone of the concept of the enhanced recovery program after PD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of nasogastric (NG) decompression after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a current practice. NG tube is associated with a high rate of morbidity including pulmonary morbidity, delayed gastric emptying and finally an increased length of hospital stay. In the era of the enhance recovery after major abdominal surgery, the place of the NG tube remains unproven after PD even if NG tube is clearly abandoned in liver, stomach and colonic surgery. Nowadays, only few retrospective series had reported the feasibility of the absence of nasogastric tube after PD, but not with a randomized control trial. The absence of NG decompression could be the corner stone of the concept of the enhanced recovery program after PD.

The objective of this prospective randomized monocentric study is to evaluate the impact of the absence of NG decompression after PD.

The aim of the study is to decrease postoperative morbidity after PD including pulmonary and delayed gastric emptying complication. The impact of the absence of systematic NG decompression could be interesting in terms of public health with a decreased of length of hospital stay. Furthermore, this is the first randomized study comparing NG tube decompression after PD to absence of NG tube after PD which would bring relevant elements to improve the recovery after PD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Digestive System Surgical Procedure Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

With Nasogastric Decompression

This group will receive conventional care according to the protocol of the service in place with removal of the nasogastric tube the 3rd postoperative day if the flow is \< 500ml / 24h, if not removal will take place on the 5th postoperative day.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

nasogastric tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Without Nasogastric decompression

The nasogastric tube will be take off at the end of the surgery, just after the extubation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

no nasogastric tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

no nasogastric tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

nasogastric tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

no double lumen nasogastric tube double lumen nasogastric tube

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years and ≤ 75 years
* patient requiring a PD for benign of malign pathology of the bilio and pancreatic intersection
* patient giving free and informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* previous gastric of esophagus surgery
* sever comorbidity such as : end stage renal disease, respiratory failure, heart failure (≥ 3 NYHA)
* Person with a measure of legal protection (guardianship)
* Pregnant woman or nursing mother
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rennes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laurent Sulpice, MD/PH/prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rennes UH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rennes Pontchaillou

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bergeat D, Merdrignac A, Robin F, Gaignard E, Rayar M, Meunier B, Beloeil H, Boudjema K, Laviolle B, Sulpice L. Nasogastric Decompression vs No Decompression After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Randomized Clinical IPOD Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020 Sep 1;155(9):e202291. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2291. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32667635 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RennesUH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.