Impact of the Absence of Nasogastric Decompression After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT ID: NCT02594956
Last Updated: 2019-02-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
125 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-16
2018-12-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The absence of NG decompression could be the corner stone of the concept of the enhanced recovery program after PD.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nasogastric Decompression Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT06413888
Early (4 Days) Versus Standard Drainage of the Abdominal Cavity After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT01368094
Nasogastric Tube in Pancreatic Surgery
NCT03462602
Closed Suction Drainage and Natural Drainage of the Pancreatic Duct in Pancreaticojejunostomy
NCT00679952
Neck Division Level and Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT03850236
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objective of this prospective randomized monocentric study is to evaluate the impact of the absence of NG decompression after PD.
The aim of the study is to decrease postoperative morbidity after PD including pulmonary and delayed gastric emptying complication. The impact of the absence of systematic NG decompression could be interesting in terms of public health with a decreased of length of hospital stay. Furthermore, this is the first randomized study comparing NG tube decompression after PD to absence of NG tube after PD which would bring relevant elements to improve the recovery after PD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
With Nasogastric Decompression
This group will receive conventional care according to the protocol of the service in place with removal of the nasogastric tube the 3rd postoperative day if the flow is \< 500ml / 24h, if not removal will take place on the 5th postoperative day.
nasogastric tube
Without Nasogastric decompression
The nasogastric tube will be take off at the end of the surgery, just after the extubation.
no nasogastric tube
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
no nasogastric tube
nasogastric tube
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patient requiring a PD for benign of malign pathology of the bilio and pancreatic intersection
* patient giving free and informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* sever comorbidity such as : end stage renal disease, respiratory failure, heart failure (≥ 3 NYHA)
* Person with a measure of legal protection (guardianship)
* Pregnant woman or nursing mother
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rennes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Laurent Sulpice, MD/PH/prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rennes UH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rennes Pontchaillou
Rennes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bergeat D, Merdrignac A, Robin F, Gaignard E, Rayar M, Meunier B, Beloeil H, Boudjema K, Laviolle B, Sulpice L. Nasogastric Decompression vs No Decompression After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Randomized Clinical IPOD Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020 Sep 1;155(9):e202291. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2291. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RennesUH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.