Evaluation of 4 New Simplified Antiretroviral Treatments in Naive HIV-1 Infected Patients in Africa (ANRS 12115 DAYANA)

NCT ID: NCT00573001

Last Updated: 2012-05-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this trial is to demonstrate that new treatments are as effective as a reference triple-agent regimen in driving plasma viral load below the detection limit early during treatment (16 weeks). These simplified treatments involve fewer tablets and intakes, fixed-dose combinations, and also radically new strategies such as boosted protease inhibitor and tenofovir.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The efficacy of antiretroviral treatments in sub-Saharan Africa has been demonstrated in cohort studies and pilot trials. The treatment regimens tested in these studies were derived from those used in pre-marketing trials conducted in industrialized countries.

However, the choice of antiretrovirals for national programs in poor countries is largely based on drug availability through the Access program, together with cost and supply considerations, rather than on field evaluations of recommended strategies.

Concomitantly with the development of antiretroviral access programs in the southern hemisphere, first-line treatments in industrialized countries have tended to become simpler, thereby improving their convenience and reducing the incidence and severity of their adverse effects. These simplified treatments involve fewer tablets and intakes, fixed-dose combinations, and also radically new strategies such as boosted protease inhibitor and tenofovir. These simplified strategies are being extensively evaluated in industrialized countries.

Long-term economic benefits will be a determining factor in the adoption of these strategies by poor countries.

Methods:

We will conduct a phase-III unblinded randomised trial focusing on the early virologic efficacy, tolerability and immuno-virologic efficacy of four simplified antiretroviral regimens given for 96 weeks to previously untreated HIV-1-infected patients in Senegal and Cameroon. The following four simplified treatments will be tested: TDF/FTC/NVP, LPV/TDF, TDF/FTC/AZT and TDF/FTC/EFV. The required number of patients (n=120) is compatible with the short-term recruitment capacity of two clinical investigation centers in Senegal and Cameroon.

Objective:

The goal of this trial is to demonstrate that these new treatments are as effective as a reference triple-agent regimen (TDF/FTC/EFV) in driving plasma viral load below the detection limit early during treatment. The principal objective is to identify simplified treatments capable of driving viral load below 50 copies/mL at week 16 in at least 50% of patients. If successful, the initial treatments will be continued and re-assessed at 96 weeks.

Study design:

120 patients previously unexposed to antiretroviral drugs will be recruited over a one-year period in two treatment centers in Dakar (Infectious Diseases department of Fann University Hospital) and Cameroon (Yaounde Military Hospital and Principal Hospital)

Expected results:

This study is fully in keeping with WHO/UNAIDS recommendations on antiretroviral treatment simplification in poor countries. These new treatments must be evaluated in the countries concerned, given the often very advanced stage of HIV disease at diagnosis, intercurrent health disorders, and local socioeconomic conditions.

This trial is not designed to compare these new treatments with one another, but rather to select the most promising treatments for future use. These preliminary results will help with the choice of treatment strategies for cohort studies and large-scale randomized trials.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) and Nevirapine

Intervention Type DRUG

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine(Truvada) 245/200mg 1cp/day ; Nevirapine 200mg 2cp/day after first 14 days

2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tenofovir (Viread) and Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Aluvia)

Intervention Type DRUG

Tenofovir (Viread) 300mg 1cp/day ; Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Aluvia) 400/100mg 4cp/day

3

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) and Zidovudine

Intervention Type DRUG

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) 245/200mg 1cp/day ; Zidovudine 300mg 2cp/day

4

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz (Atripla)

Intervention Type DRUG

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz (Atripla) 300/200/600mg 1cp/day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) and Nevirapine

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine(Truvada) 245/200mg 1cp/day ; Nevirapine 200mg 2cp/day after first 14 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz (Atripla)

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz (Atripla) 300/200/600mg 1cp/day

Intervention Type DRUG

Tenofovir (Viread) and Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Aluvia)

Tenofovir (Viread) 300mg 1cp/day ; Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Aluvia) 400/100mg 4cp/day

Intervention Type DRUG

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) and Zidovudine

Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) 245/200mg 1cp/day ; Zidovudine 300mg 2cp/day

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Truvada Atripla Viread Aluvia Truvada

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age over 18 years for Senegal and over 21 years for Cameroon
* HIV-1 infected patient
* patient naive from any antiretroviral treatment
* CD4 cell count over 50 cells per mm3
* contraceptive method use
* informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria

* opportunistic infection ongoing or any other serious pathology
* ongoing treatment with rifampicine
* severe renal or hepatic impairment
* HbSAg positive
* Hemoglobine under 8g/L
* Neutrophils under 500 cells per mm3
* ongoing pregnancy or breastfeeding
* treatment by contra-indicated drugs (as described in study drugs notices)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gilead Sciences

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Landman Roland, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba

Sow Papa Salif, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hopital de Fann, Dakar

Koulla Shiro Sinata, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hopital Central Yaoundé

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hopital Central

Yaoundé, , Cameroon

Site Status

Hopital de Fann

Dakar, , Senegal

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Cameroon Senegal

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.anrs.fr

Sponsor web page

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IMEA 032

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ANRS12115 DAYANA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ANRS 12406 EvvA Study
NCT04593979 UNKNOWN