Evaluation of 4 New Simplified Antiretroviral Treatments in Naive HIV-1 Infected Patients in Africa (ANRS 12115 DAYANA)
NCT ID: NCT00573001
Last Updated: 2012-05-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-07-31
2011-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Solutions for the Management of Virologic Failure on TLD in Sub-Saharan Africa
NCT05373758
Simple Once Daily Triple Regimen Including Tenofovir, Emtricitabine and Efavirenz in HIV-1 Infected Patients (ANRS 1207)
NCT00158457
Determining the Effects of Observed and Self-Administered Drug Regimens in HIV Infected Adults
NCT00608569
CD4 Cell Recovery in HIV-1 Patients Comparing 2 Treatment Regimes
NCT00966160
Antiretroviral Therapy for Acute HIV Infection
NCT03877536
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, the choice of antiretrovirals for national programs in poor countries is largely based on drug availability through the Access program, together with cost and supply considerations, rather than on field evaluations of recommended strategies.
Concomitantly with the development of antiretroviral access programs in the southern hemisphere, first-line treatments in industrialized countries have tended to become simpler, thereby improving their convenience and reducing the incidence and severity of their adverse effects. These simplified treatments involve fewer tablets and intakes, fixed-dose combinations, and also radically new strategies such as boosted protease inhibitor and tenofovir. These simplified strategies are being extensively evaluated in industrialized countries.
Long-term economic benefits will be a determining factor in the adoption of these strategies by poor countries.
Methods:
We will conduct a phase-III unblinded randomised trial focusing on the early virologic efficacy, tolerability and immuno-virologic efficacy of four simplified antiretroviral regimens given for 96 weeks to previously untreated HIV-1-infected patients in Senegal and Cameroon. The following four simplified treatments will be tested: TDF/FTC/NVP, LPV/TDF, TDF/FTC/AZT and TDF/FTC/EFV. The required number of patients (n=120) is compatible with the short-term recruitment capacity of two clinical investigation centers in Senegal and Cameroon.
Objective:
The goal of this trial is to demonstrate that these new treatments are as effective as a reference triple-agent regimen (TDF/FTC/EFV) in driving plasma viral load below the detection limit early during treatment. The principal objective is to identify simplified treatments capable of driving viral load below 50 copies/mL at week 16 in at least 50% of patients. If successful, the initial treatments will be continued and re-assessed at 96 weeks.
Study design:
120 patients previously unexposed to antiretroviral drugs will be recruited over a one-year period in two treatment centers in Dakar (Infectious Diseases department of Fann University Hospital) and Cameroon (Yaounde Military Hospital and Principal Hospital)
Expected results:
This study is fully in keeping with WHO/UNAIDS recommendations on antiretroviral treatment simplification in poor countries. These new treatments must be evaluated in the countries concerned, given the often very advanced stage of HIV disease at diagnosis, intercurrent health disorders, and local socioeconomic conditions.
This trial is not designed to compare these new treatments with one another, but rather to select the most promising treatments for future use. These preliminary results will help with the choice of treatment strategies for cohort studies and large-scale randomized trials.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) and Nevirapine
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine(Truvada) 245/200mg 1cp/day ; Nevirapine 200mg 2cp/day after first 14 days
2
Tenofovir (Viread) and Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Aluvia)
Tenofovir (Viread) 300mg 1cp/day ; Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Aluvia) 400/100mg 4cp/day
3
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) and Zidovudine
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) 245/200mg 1cp/day ; Zidovudine 300mg 2cp/day
4
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz (Atripla)
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz (Atripla) 300/200/600mg 1cp/day
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) and Nevirapine
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine(Truvada) 245/200mg 1cp/day ; Nevirapine 200mg 2cp/day after first 14 days
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz (Atripla)
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz (Atripla) 300/200/600mg 1cp/day
Tenofovir (Viread) and Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Aluvia)
Tenofovir (Viread) 300mg 1cp/day ; Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Aluvia) 400/100mg 4cp/day
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) and Zidovudine
Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (Truvada) 245/200mg 1cp/day ; Zidovudine 300mg 2cp/day
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* HIV-1 infected patient
* patient naive from any antiretroviral treatment
* CD4 cell count over 50 cells per mm3
* contraceptive method use
* informed consent signed
Exclusion Criteria
* ongoing treatment with rifampicine
* severe renal or hepatic impairment
* HbSAg positive
* Hemoglobine under 8g/L
* Neutrophils under 500 cells per mm3
* ongoing pregnancy or breastfeeding
* treatment by contra-indicated drugs (as described in study drugs notices)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba
OTHER
Gilead Sciences
INDUSTRY
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Landman Roland, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba
Sow Papa Salif, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hopital de Fann, Dakar
Koulla Shiro Sinata, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hopital Central Yaoundé
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hopital Central
Yaoundé, , Cameroon
Hopital de Fann
Dakar, , Senegal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Sponsor web page
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IMEA 032
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ANRS12115 DAYANA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.