Two Different Methods of Collecting Stem Cells For an Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT00566228

Last Updated: 2018-07-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

122 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-12-31

Study Completion Date

2015-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: It is not yet known which method of stem cell collection is best for patients undergoing an autologous stem cell transplant.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is comparing two different methods of collecting stem cells in patients undergoing stem cell transplant for diffuse large cell lymphoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* Determine the therapeutic effect of instrument-driven lymphocyte enrichment of the autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) compared to "standard autograft collection" as determined by progression-free survival post-transplantation.

Secondary

* Determine the profile of immune effector cells of the "lymphocyte enriched autograft" vs "standard autograft" and peripheral blood after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and their impact on post- ASCT immunological reconstitution and clinical endpoints.
* Perform quantitative and functional analysis of T, B, NK, and dendritic cells from the apheresis product and peripheral blood samples at multiple timepoints after transplantation.
* Determine and compare the proportion of patients who are progression-free and alive at 1 and 2 years.
* Determine the differences in overall survival between the two collection method arms.
* Evaluate and characterize differences in transplantation outcomes (e.g., time to ALC engraftment, incidence of infection, and the CD34 count) between the two collection method arms.

OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to baseline International Prognostic Factor (≥ 2 factors vs \< 2 factors) and PET scan findings prior to transplantation (positive vs negative). Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) alone or G-CSF and sargramostim (GM-CSF) daily for stem cell mobilization. Once the peripheral CD34-positive cell count reaches ≥ 10/μL, patients undergo stem cell collection. Patients are then randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms for standard autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

* Immunologic autograft engineering: Patients' stem cells are collected according to modified Amicus settings (i.e., MNC OFFSET = 0.0 and RBC = 7.0). Patients undergo ASCT IV on the day of apheresis (lymphocyte enriched autograft).
* Standard autograft collection: Patients' stem cells are collected according to standard Amicus settings (i.e., MNC OFFSET = 1.5 and RBC OFFSET = 5.0). Patients undergo ASCT IV on the day of apheresis.

Patients undergo blood sample collection periodically for immunological studies. Samples are analyzed for immunophenotyping of immune cell subsets via multicolor flow cytometry, immunoglobulin reconstitution, and functional T-cell immunity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at day 15 post ASCT and then at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Immunologic autograft engineering

Patients' stem cells are collected according to modified Amicus settings (i.e., MNC OFFSET = 0.0 and RBC = 7.0). Patients undergo ASCT IV on the day of apheresis (lymphocyte enriched autograft).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients undergo autologous stem cell transplantation

leukapheresis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Stem cells collected

Standard autograft collection

Patients' stem cells are collected according to standard Amicus settings (i.e., MNC OFFSET = 1.5 and RBC OFFSET = 5.0). Patients undergo ASCT IV on the day of apheresis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients undergo autologous stem cell transplantation

leukapheresis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Stem cells collected

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Patients undergo autologous stem cell transplantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

leukapheresis

Stem cells collected

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Diagnosis of diffuse large cell lymphoma

* Low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma transformed to diffuse large cell lymphoma allowed
* Candidate for with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

* Not requiring bone marrow harvest to collect stem cells
* No chemotherapy with filgrastim ( G-CSF) or mobilization study drug (i.e., AMD3100) needed for mobilization of stem cells

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* ECOG performance status 0-1
* Cardiac and pulmonary status sufficient to undergo apheresis and stem cell transplantation
* Negative pregnancy test
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* HIV negative
* No active uncontrolled infection requiring antibiotic treatment
* No comorbid condition which, in view of the investigators, renders the patient at high risk from treatment complications
* Willing to provide all research blood samples as required by the protocol

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* At least 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy (rituxan is not considered chemotherapy for the purpose of this study)
* More than 4 weeks since prior experimental therapy
* No concurrent enrollment on another experimental protocol during the mobilization phase
* No concurrent participation in any autologous stem cell transplantation study that is not using the standard conditioning regimens for lymphomas
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

120 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luis F. Porrata, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Porrata LF, Burgstaler EA, Winters JL, Jacob EK, Gastineau DA, Suman VJ, Inwards DJ, Ansell SM, Micallef IN, Johnston PB, Nevala W, Markovic SN. Immunologic Autograft Engineering and Survival in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jun;22(6):1017-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.01.024. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26826432 (View on PubMed)

Porrata LF, Inwards DJ, Ansell SM, Micallef IN, Johnston PB, Villasboas JC, Markovic SN. Autograft immune content and survival in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A post hoc analysis. Leuk Res. 2019 Jun;81:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30978434 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P30CA015083

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

MC0681

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

07-000789

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MC0681

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tandem Auto-Allo Transplant for Lymphoma
NCT01181271 COMPLETED PHASE2