A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) and Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

NCT ID: NCT00556322

Last Updated: 2015-02-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

424 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-31

Study Completion Date

2012-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This 2 arm study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of Tarceva and that of standard of care chemotherapy in patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic NSCLC experiencing disease progression after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy.Eligible patients will be randomized to receive either Tarceva 150mg po daily, or comparator (either Alimta 500mg/m2 every 3 weeks, or Taxotere 75mg/m2 every 3 weeks). The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression ,and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

erlotinib [Tarceva]

Intervention Type DRUG

150mg po daily

2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Alimta or Taxotere

Intervention Type DRUG

500mg/m2 / 3 weeks (Alimta) or 75mg/m2 / 3 weeks (Taxotere)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

erlotinib [Tarceva]

150mg po daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Alimta or Taxotere

500mg/m2 / 3 weeks (Alimta) or 75mg/m2 / 3 weeks (Taxotere)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult patients \>=18 years of age;
* histologically documented, locally advanced or recurrent or metastatic NSCLC;
* measurable disease;
* disease progression during 1-4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy.

Exclusion Criteria

* any other malignancies within the last 5 years;
* unstable systemic disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Waratah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Geelong, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Klagenfurt, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Guangzhou, , China

Site Status

Guangzhou, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

České Budějovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Bayonne, , France

Site Status

Brest, , France

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pau, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Bad Berka, , Germany

Site Status

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

Neuruppin, , Germany

Site Status

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Heraklion, , Greece

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Deszk, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Szombathely, , Hungary

Site Status

Törökbálint, , Hungary

Site Status

Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Rome, Lazio, Italy

Site Status

Ancona, The Marches, Italy

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

George Town, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Otwock, , Poland

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Balashikha, , Russia

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Kirov, , Russia

Site Status

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Kuzmolovo, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Perm, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Sashi, , Russia

Site Status

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Poprad, , Slovakia

Site Status

Golnik, , Slovenia

Site Status

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Maribor, , Slovenia

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Suwon, , South Korea

Site Status

Santander, Cantabria, Spain

Site Status

A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Uzhhorod, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Chelmsford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Dundee, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Caracas, , Venezuela

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Austria Belgium Canada Chile China Czechia Denmark France Germany Greece Hungary Italy Lithuania Malaysia New Zealand Poland Romania Russia Slovakia Slovenia South Africa South Korea Spain Ukraine United Kingdom Venezuela

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, Cicenas S, Miliauskas S, Grigorescu AC, Hillenbach C, Johannsdottir HK, Klughammer B, Gonzalez EE. Efficacy and safety of erlotinib versus chemotherapy in second-line treatment of patients with advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer with poor prognosis (TITAN): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):300-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70385-0. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22277837 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BO18602

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.