Use of High Frequency Chest Compression in Pediatric Status Asthmaticus
NCT ID: NCT00552448
Last Updated: 2016-09-14
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-10-31
2014-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Airway Pressure During Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Children
NCT02387632
HFCWO in Hospitalized Asthmatic Children
NCT00722020
External Nasal Dilator and Oxygen Therapy in Respiratory Failure
NCT02662387
HFNC Versus NCPAP/ NPPV in Infants With Severe Bronchiolitis
NCT04650230
The Factors Causing Treatment Failure in Children Receiving Oxygen Therapy With High-flow Nasal Cannula
NCT06146439
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
HFCC is an FDA (1988 under Class II 510K) approved device/modality of chest physiotherapy which has been utilized in patients with mucus hypersecretion, atelectasis and pneumonia. There is a paucity of pediatric studies. A comparative retrospective/prospective data analysis on exacerbations and hospitalizations in medically fragile (profoundly disabled) children using outpatient HFCC showed that use of this therapy reduced days of hospitalization for pulmonary exacerbations. Long term use in quadriplegic children reduced pulmonary secretions, incidence of pneumonia, and number of hospitalizations. In the pediatric cystic fibrosis population, there was improvement of lung function during hospitalization and long term decrease in progression of lung disease. Furthermore, in patients with mild to moderate asthma, there was no decline in lung function with the use of beta agonist and HFCC versus beta agonist alone indicating good tolerance and safety.
Because asthma patients have mucus hypersecretion and this modality has been shown to be effective in other patient populations with mucus hypersecretion, this modality can be used as a means of reducing pulmonary morbidity and thereby allowing the respiratory therapist to allocate his/her time more efficiently.
Purpose:
Assess efficacy of HFCC in PICU population ages 2 to 21 years of age with status asthmaticus
Design: Prospective Randomized non blinded HFCC (administered 4 times a day for 20 minutes) with conventional PICU management of asthma exacerbation vs. conventional PICU management of asthma exacerbation alone. Child would not have any of the standard asthma medications changed or stopped because of this study.
End Points of Interest:
Primary
1\) PICU days - Average number of PICU days as researched is about 4.47 days. There may be factors such as non PICU floor availability and PICU rounds that may delay transfer from PICU to the non PICU floor. So the official discharge from PICU will be when the attending PICU physician announces or deems it acceptable for PICU discharge
Secondary
1. Length of hospitalization
2. Pediatric Asthma Severity Score a validated asthma severity score in pediatric population: 1) observed level of respiratory distress 2) accessory muscle use 3) auscultation (degree of wheezing) 4) oxygen saturation 5) respiratory rate Scored observations 0, 1, or 2 and total the observation numbers for a Severity score
3. Discomfort
Patient inclusion 2 to 21 yo (VEST approved for over two yo) Admitted to PICU for status asthmaticus Negative urine pregnancy test prior to initiation of study in those with menses
Patient Exclusion
Absolute contraindication to VEST use:
1. Unstable head or neck injury
2. Active hemorrhage with hemodynamic instability
3. Intracranial pressure \> 20 mmHg or those in whom intracranial pressures should be avoided (was a relative contraindication but after discussion moved to absolute)
Presence of anomalies such as:
1. Former premature infant with BPD
2. Congenital bronchogenic or pulmonary anomaly (i.e. CF)
3. Congenital heart disease
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Use of the HFCC device in addition to standard therapy for status asthmaticus. The use of HFCC will not affect the therapy received
High Frequency Chest Compression VEST
every 6 hours for 20 minutes
2
This group will not use the VEST or HFCC. They will just have standard therapy for status asthmaticus. The standard therapy will not be affected if they are in this group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High Frequency Chest Compression VEST
every 6 hours for 20 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
1. Unstable head or neck injury
2. Active hemorrhage with hemodynamic instability
3. Intracranial pressure \> 20 mmHg or those in whom intracranial pressures should be avoided (was a relative contraindication but after discussion moved to absolute)
Presence of anomalies such as:
1. Former premature infant with BPD
2. Congenital bronchogenic or pulmonary anomaly (i.e. CF)
3. Congenital heart disease
2 Years
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adaobi C Kanu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, United States
Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Lubbock, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20076812
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.