Safety and Efficacy of CDB-2914 in Comparison to Levonorgestrel for Emergency Contraception

NCT ID: NCT00551616

Last Updated: 2022-05-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2221 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2009-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of CDB-2914 in comparison to levonorgestrel for preventing pregnancy up to 5 days after unprotected sexual intercourse.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Contraception

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CDB-2914

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CDB-2914

Intervention Type DRUG

Single dose

Levonorgestrel

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Levonorgestrel

Intervention Type DRUG

Single dose

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CDB-2914

Single dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Levonorgestrel

Single dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* women 16 or older in UK(except Northern Ireland) sites, 17 years or more in Northern Ireland (UK) and 18 years or more in Ireland and US
* present within 120 hours of unprotected intercourse
* regular menstrual cycles
* No current use of hormonal contraception
* Willing to not use hormonal methods of contraception until study completion
* At least one complete menstrual cycle (2 menses) post miscarriage, delivery or abortion
* For women who present more than 72 hours after intercourse, decline the insertion of an Intra Uterine Device for emergency contraception
* Able to provide informed consent
* Willing to abstain from further acts of unprotected intercourse until study completion

Exclusion Criteria

* One or more acts of unprotected intercourse more than 120 hours
* current or recent use of hormonal methods of contraception
* currently pregnant or breastfeeding
* tubal ligation or current use of IUD
* Use of hormonal emergency contraception since last menstrual period
* Current use of IUD
* Tubal ligation
* Partner with a vasectomy
* Unsure about the date of the last menstrual period
* Severe asthma insufficiently controlled by oral glucocorticoid
* Hypersensitivity to the active substance levonorgestrel or any of the excipients of the drug products used in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

HRA Pharma

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anna F Glasier, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NHS Lothian Family Planning Service

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Planned Parenthood Hollywood

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood Santa Monica

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Greater Miami

Lake Worth, Florida, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Greater Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Greater Miami

North Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Greater Miami

Stuart, Florida, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Greater Miami

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio Akron Health Center

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio Bedford Health Center

Bedford, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio East Cleveland Health Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio Old Brooklyn Health Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio Kent Health Center

Kent, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio Rocky River Health Center

Rocky River, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Texas Capitol Region

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fannin Health Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas Research Department

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood Association of Utah

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood Association of Utah

Orem, Utah, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood Association of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Planned Parenthood Association of Utah

West Valley City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Well Woman Centre

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

NHS Grampian Sexual and Reproductive Health

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Brook Family Planning Clinic

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

NHS Lothian Family Planning Service

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde Family Planning Service

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool PCT Family Planning Services

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London Sexual and Reproductive Health

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester Primary Care Trust

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham Contraception & Sexual Health Service

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxfordshire PCT Community Health

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Ireland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Fine PM, Logan SJ, Casale W, Van Horn J, Sogor L, Blithe DL, Scherrer B, Mathe H, Jaspart A, Ulmann A, Gainer E. Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010 Feb 13;375(9714):555-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60101-8. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20116841 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2914-004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.