Evaluation of Cardiac Compass With OptiVol in the Early Detection of Decompensation Events for Heart Failure

NCT ID: NCT00510198

Last Updated: 2019-04-10

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: TERMINATED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 120 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2007-10-31
• Study Completion Date: 2009-04-30

Brief Summary

The purpose of the PRECEDE-HF study is to collect data to compare patients whose heart failure is managed using Cardiac Compass with OptiVol (which is a tool in the device that records information about the heart that doctors can use to help treat their heart disease) combined with standard treatment methods (Access Group) to patients whose heart failure is managed by standard treatment methods only (Control Group). This comparison will show if the additional monitoring provided by Cardiac Compass with OptiVol delays the time patients are first admitted to hospital for heart failure or delays the time to death.

Detailed Description

PRECEDE-HF was a prospective, multi-center, randomized, investigational device exemption (IDE) clinical study. The purpose of this study was to collect data required to determine whether the use of Cardiac Compass including OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring with standard clinical assessment ("Access Arm") will result in a longer time to first heart failure hospitalization or death compared to standard clinical assessment alone ("Control Arm") and to support the approval of the following device features:

• OptiVol Alert (audible and home monitor alerts) for use in Medtronic devices
• SentryCheck™ Monitor
• OptiVol Alert Suspend (OptiVol enhancement)
• OptiVol Reference Impedance Adjustment (OptiVol enhancement)

Conditions

Congestive Heart Failure

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Control Arm 1: SOC and CC with OptiVol

Standard of Care and Cardiac Compass with OptiVol as the Control. Intervention is standard of care, such as symptom assessment with the addition of viewing Cardiac Compass trends and the OptiVol diagnostic.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cardiac Compass with OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Review of Cardiac Compass with OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring

Control Arm 2: SOC

Intervention is Standard of Care alone, such as assessment of symptoms, only. Device trending information, but OptiVol is not allowed.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard of Care alone (clinical assessment)

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Clinical assessment utilizing standard of care, alone.

Interventions

Cardiac Compass with OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring

Review of Cardiac Compass with OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Standard of Care alone (clinical assessment)

Clinical assessment utilizing standard of care, alone.

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

The following criteria apply to all subjects:

• Subject has a CRT-D or dual chamber ICD with Cardiac Compass and OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring implanted in the pectoral region at least 30 days prior to enrollment. CRT-D/ICD must be supported by the Medtronic CareLink Network.
• Subject has a market-released, transvenous, high voltage RV lead
• Subject has a market-released RA lead
• If subject has an LV lead, it must be compatible, not Y-adapted and not currently under investigation
• Subject's heart failure regimen (i.e. beta blocker and ACE inhibitor (or substitute) unless documented evidence of intolerance is available) adheres to current ACC/AHA guidelines for management of chronic heart failure in adult patients
• Subject has a history of at least one heart failure related hospitalization, Emergency Department (ED) visit, or urgent visit necessitating IV diuretic, IV inotropic, IV vasodilator, or other parenteral therapy within 12 months prior to baseline evaluation
• Subject is at least 18 years of age
• Subject is willing and able to comply with the Clinical Investigation Plan (e.g. willing and able to remain available for follow-up visits, use SentryCheck, etc.)
• Subject is willing and able to transmit data using the Medtronic CareLink Network
• Subject (or subject's legally authorized representative) is willing and able to sign and date the study Informed Consent and HIPAA Authorization (U.S.)

Exclusion Criteria

The following criteria apply to all subjects:

• Subject is post heart transplant or actively listed on the transplant list and reasonable probability (as defined by investigator) of undergoing transplantation in the next year
• Subject received a coronary artery bypass graft or valve surgery in the last 90 days
• Subject had a myocardial infarction (MI) in the last 90 days.
• Subject is indicated for valve replacement/repair
• Subject's life expectancy due to non-cardiac reasons is less than six months
• Subject has serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL measured within 30 days prior to enrollment.
• Subject is on chronic renal dialysis
• Subject is on continuous or intermittent (> 2 stable infusions per week) infusion therapy for HF
• Subject has complex and uncorrected congenital heart disease
• Subject is enrolled in a Disease Management Program where an outside vendor, company or service is employed to determine, monitor, and/ or alert a clinician or subject to weight changes or other HF signs or symptoms via interactive or passive systems
• Subject is implanted with a cardiac hemodynamic monitor or left ventricular assist device(LVAD)
• Subject is enrolled in a concurrent study, with the exception of a study approved by the Medtronic PRECEDE-HF Clinical Trial Leader prior to enrollment

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

PRECEDE-HF Study Team

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Medtronic

Locations

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Berkeley, California, United States

Larkspur, California, United States

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Fort Collins, Colorado, United States

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Kankakee, Illinois, United States

Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Takoma Park, Maryland, United States

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States

Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Albany, New York, United States

Akron, Ohio, United States

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Elyria, Ohio, United States

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Doylestown, Pennsylvania, United States

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Austin, Texas, United States

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Countries

United States

Other Identifiers

603

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id