Randomized Clinical Trial of Nasal Turbinate Reduction to Improve Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Outcomes for Sleep Apnea

NCT ID: NCT00503802

Last Updated: 2013-06-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

242 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Obstructive sleep apnea occurs in 2-4% of middle age adults and results in significant morbidity and mortality. The first line therapy is provision of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) via a nasal mask chronically. Nasal resistance related to nasal turbinate enlargement may compromise CPAP treatment. This randomized double-blind sham-placebo-controlled trial tests the hypothesis that nasal turbinate reduction improves the nasal passage, CPAP use, and sleep apnea quality of life in newly diagnosed sleep apnea patients who are recommended CPAP therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome afflicts at least 2 - 4% of adults and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the primary treatment for sleep apnea in adults, but non-adherence to CPAP limits its effectiveness. Even with maximal medical therapy, nasal obstruction is common in sleep apnea patients and may hamper both CPAP adherence and efficacy. However, the most common cause of nasal obstruction in sleep apnea patients (turbinate hypertrophy) is surgically correctable. Treatment of nasal obstruction may lead to more successful use of CPAP. The long-term goal of the proposed research is to develop a novel, multi-disciplinary, multi-modal approach to therapy, in order to improve clinically important treatment outcomes for sleep apnea. The short-term objectives of this proposal are to:

1. Quantify the effect of nasal turbinate reduction on the nasal airway;
2. Determine whether turbinate reduction increases CPAP use or efficacy; and
3. Determine whether turbinate reduction positively influences CPAP treatment outcomes.

We will employ a single-site, randomized, double-blind, sham-placebo-controlled trial to test the hypotheses that turbinate reduction:

1. increases nasal airway cross-sectional area;
2. increases mean nightly objective CPAP use; and
3. improves sleep apnea quality of life 3 months after CPAP titration.

We will use the radiofrequency turbinate reduction surgical technique, which allows ethical randomization and effective blinding. Three, six, and 12 months after turbinate reduction and CPAP titration we will measure the change in the minimal nasal cross-sectional area, level of CPAP use, and improvement in sleep apnea quality of life. Secondary outcomes will capture this treatment's broader impact on the nose, CPAP, and sleep apnea. If turbinate reduction can be shown to improve sleep apnea outcomes through increased use or efficacy of CPAP therapy, this trial will demonstrate the value and effectiveness of a novel, multidisciplinary, combined medical-surgical approach to the management of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sleep Apnea Syndromes Nasal Obstruction Turbinate Hypertrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Active RF treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radiofrequency Turbinate Reduction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Radiofrequency Turbinate Reduction

2

Sham RF treatment

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham RF

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The steps of the procedure are as follows: 1) application of topical anesthetic to the turbinate mucosa bilaterally; 2) injection of 1.0 ml of lidocaine 1% with epinephrine 1:100,000 with a 30-gauge needle into each inferior turbinate anteriorly; 3) delay five minutes for local anesthetic to take full effect; 4) re-insertion of the anesthetic needle to check for complete anesthesia on one side, and injection of another 1.0 ml of lidocaine 1% with epinephrine 1:100,000 5) placement of the radiofrequency electrode (23-gauge, 1 cm long) into the inferior turbinate; 6) delivery of 300 Joules of radiofrequency energy to the turbinate over 29 seconds (no energy will be delivered in sham procedure)7) placement of a cotton pledget (soaked in oxymetazoline solution 0.05%) against the treatment site 8) repeat steps 3 - 8 for the contra-lateral inferior turbinate; 9) removal of the cotton pledgets after several minutes; and 11) observation of hemostasis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radiofrequency Turbinate Reduction

Radiofrequency Turbinate Reduction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sham RF

The steps of the procedure are as follows: 1) application of topical anesthetic to the turbinate mucosa bilaterally; 2) injection of 1.0 ml of lidocaine 1% with epinephrine 1:100,000 with a 30-gauge needle into each inferior turbinate anteriorly; 3) delay five minutes for local anesthetic to take full effect; 4) re-insertion of the anesthetic needle to check for complete anesthesia on one side, and injection of another 1.0 ml of lidocaine 1% with epinephrine 1:100,000 5) placement of the radiofrequency electrode (23-gauge, 1 cm long) into the inferior turbinate; 6) delivery of 300 Joules of radiofrequency energy to the turbinate over 29 seconds (no energy will be delivered in sham procedure)7) placement of a cotton pledget (soaked in oxymetazoline solution 0.05%) against the treatment site 8) repeat steps 3 - 8 for the contra-lateral inferior turbinate; 9) removal of the cotton pledgets after several minutes; and 11) observation of hemostasis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-80 years
* Newly diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index \>= 5 events/hour)
* CPAP therapy recommended
* Persistent bilateral inferior turbinate hypertrophy
* American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I-III
* Ability to give informed consent
* Ability and willingness to complete the study protocol
* Fluency in verbal and written English

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous surgical turbinate treatment
* Other nasal disorders (i.e. recurrent epistaxis, desiccated or crusted mucosa, severe bilateral obstructing septal deformity, or obstructing polyposis)
* Active respiratory tract infections
* Coagulopathy
* Severe psychiatric comorbidity (taking anti-psychotic medication)
* American Society of Anesthesiologists Class IV or V
* Pregnancy
* No telephone
* Plans of moving during the study period
* Known contraindication to lidocaine with epinephrine, oxymetazoline, or acetaminophen
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ed Weaver

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Edward M. Weaver, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Washington

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UW Sleep Disorders Center at Harborview Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Virginia Mason Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Washington General Clinical Research Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Powell NB, Zonato AI, Weaver EM, Li K, Troell R, Riley RW, Guilleminault C. Radiofrequency treatment of turbinate hypertrophy in subjects using continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical pilot trial. Laryngoscope. 2001 Oct;111(10):1783-90. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200110000-00023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11801946 (View on PubMed)

Li HY, Engleman H, Hsu CY, Izci B, Vennelle M, Cross M, Douglas NJ. Acoustic reflection for nasal airway measurement in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Sleep. 2005 Dec;28(12):1554-9. doi: 10.1093/sleep/28.12.1554.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16408415 (View on PubMed)

Sugiura T, Noda A, Nakata S, Yasuda Y, Soga T, Miyata S, Nakai S, Koike Y. Influence of nasal resistance on initial acceptance of continuous positive airway pressure in treatment for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Respiration. 2007;74(1):56-60. doi: 10.1159/000089836. Epub 2005 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16299414 (View on PubMed)

Lam DJ, James KT, Weaver EM. Comparison of anatomic, physiological, and subjective measures of the nasal airway. Am J Rhinol. 2006 Sep-Oct;20(5):463-70. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2006.20.2940.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17063739 (View on PubMed)

Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Feb;130(2):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.09.016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14990910 (View on PubMed)

Friedman M, Tanyeri H, Lim JW, Landsberg R, Vaidyanathan K, Caldarelli D. Effect of improved nasal breathing on obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Jan;122(1):71-4. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70147-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10629486 (View on PubMed)

Hilberg O, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures. Rhinol Suppl. 2000 Dec;16:3-17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11225287 (View on PubMed)

Flemons WW, Reimer MA. Development of a disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;158(2):494-503. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.2.9712036.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9700127 (View on PubMed)

Flemons WW, Reimer MA. Measurement properties of the calgary sleep apnea quality of life index. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jan 15;165(2):159-64. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.2.2010008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11790647 (View on PubMed)

Yokoe T, Minoguchi K, Matsuo H, Oda N, Minoguchi H, Yoshino G, Hirano T, Adachi M. Elevated levels of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome are decreased by nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Circulation. 2003 Mar 4;107(8):1129-34. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000052627.99976.18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12615790 (View on PubMed)

Jara SM, Hopp ML, Weaver EM. Association of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment With Sexual Quality of Life in Patients With Sleep Apnea: Follow-up Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jul 1;144(7):587-593. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0485.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29800001 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

06-3050-D 02

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R01HL084139

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

30678-D

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.