Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combined Upper-airway and Breathing Control Therapies for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT03189173
The Effects of Nasal Airflow on Upper Airway Dilator Muscles During Sleep
NCT03506178
The Effects of Trazodone on Sleep Apnea Severity
NCT01817907
Effects of Suboptimal CPAP Therapy on Symptoms of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea
NCT02781740
Antihypertensive Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Resistant Hypertensive Patients With Sleep Apnea
NCT00929175
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Current evidence suggests that OSA pathogenesis involves the interactions of at least four physiological traits comprising 1) the pharyngeal anatomy and its propensity towards collapse 2) the ability of the upper airway dilator muscles to activate and reopen the airway during sleep (i.e. neuromuscular compensation), 3) the arousal threshold from sleep (i.e. the propensity for hypopneas/apneas to lead to arousal and fragmented sleep) and 4) the stability of the ventilatory feedback loop (i.e. loop gain). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the most common treatment for OSA but it is often poorly tolerated; only \~50% of patients diagnosed with OSA continue therapy beyond 3 months. Given this limitation, alternative approaches have been tested and have generally focused on the use of oral appliances, surgery, and more recently pharmacological agents.
However, these alternate therapies, when used alone as monotherapy, rarely abolish OSA completely. This is not that surprising given that these treatments focus primarily on correcting only one trait and ignore the fact that the pathogenesis of OSA is multi-factorial. Thus the investigators hypothesize that some patients could be treated without CPAP if more than one trait is targeted (i.e., the investigators take a multi-factorial treatment approach). Such a multi-factorial approach is not unusual in Medicine. Many disorders such as diabetes, asthma, hypertension, cancer and congestive heart failure are treated with more than one medication or modality. In our view, giving CPAP to all OSA patients is like treating every diabetic with insulin, or every asthmatic with oral steroids - these treatments, like CPAP, are poorly tolerated and ignore the complexity of the underlying biology.
The investigators recently published a technique that measures the four traits using repeated 'drops' in CPAP levels during sleep. Each trait is measured in a way that allows model-based predictions of the presence/absence of OSA. With this technique the investigators demonstrated in a small group of CPAP-treated OSA subjects that decreasing the sensitivity of the ventilatory feedback loop (i.e. reducing loop gain) by approximately 50% with either acetazolamide or oxygen reduces the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) by half. Interestingly, our model allowed us to make the prediction that if, in addition to an agent that reduces loop gain, the investigators also gave a drug that increases the arousal threshold by at least 25%, then the investigators could potentially abolish OSA (rather than just reduce its severity by 50%). This is of great interest given that the investigators already have shown than eszopiclone increases the arousal threshold by approximately 30% and is associated with an improvement in the AHI. However, to date there has been no study examining the combination of an agent that reduces loop gain (i.e. oxygen) with one that increases the arousal threshold (i.e. eszopiclone) as a treatment for OSA.
To determine the effect of combination therapy on each of the four traits and how they contribute to our model prediction of OSA, as well as on apnea severity. Specifically the investigators will assess:
1. The physiological traits responsible for OSA:
1. Pharyngeal anatomy and its propensity towards collapse
2. The ability of the upper airway dilator muscles to activate and reopen the airway during sleep (i.e. neuromuscular compensation)
3. Arousal threshold from sleep (i.e. the propensity for hypopneas/apneas to lead to arousal and fragmented sleep).
4. Stability of the ventilatory control system feedback loop (i.e. loop gain)
2. The severity of OSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), percent of time with unstable breathing, sleep quality)
STUDY DESIGN:
A single-blinded randomized control design will be used. Initially, participants will be randomized to either the treatment or placebo arm where they will have both a clinical and research polysomnography (PSG); these initial PSGs constitute what will be referred to as VISIT 1 (see outcome measures). The purpose of the clinical PSG is to determine the severity of OSA (i.e. AHI). The research PSG will measure the 4 physiological OSA traits.
During the treatment arm, in both PSGs (i.e. clinical and research) participants will be given eszopiclone (3mg by mouth) to take before bed and be placed on oxygen throughout the night. During the placebo arm, subjects will be given a placebo to take before bed and placed on room air while they sleep. Participants will then have at least a 1-week washout period and cross over to the other arm of the study whereby the clinical and research PSG will be repeated; these studies constitute what will be referred to asVISIT 2 (see outcome measures).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo
Subjects will receive both a sugar pill and room air during their overnight sleep studies
Placebo pill
Subjects will receive a sugar pill (in combination with room air) during their placebo arm studies
Room air
Subjects will receive room air (in combination with a sugar pill) during their placebo arm studies
Treatment
Subjects will receive both Lunesta (eszopiclone) and medical grade oxygen during their overnight sleep studies
Sedative
Subjects will receive eszopiclone (in combination with medical oxygen) during their treatment arm studies
Oxygen
Subjects will receive medical grade oxygen (in combination with eszopiclone) during their treatment arm studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Placebo pill
Subjects will receive a sugar pill (in combination with room air) during their placebo arm studies
Sedative
Subjects will receive eszopiclone (in combination with medical oxygen) during their treatment arm studies
Room air
Subjects will receive room air (in combination with a sugar pill) during their placebo arm studies
Oxygen
Subjects will receive medical grade oxygen (in combination with eszopiclone) during their treatment arm studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Documented OSA (AHI \> 10 events/hr Non rapid eye movement sleep supine)
* If treated then, current CPAP use (\>4 hrs CPAP/night for \> 2 months)
Exclusion Criteria
* Any other sleep disorder (Periodic leg movement syndrome, restless legs syndrome, insomnia, etc.)
* Use of medications known to affect sleep/arousal, breathing, or muscle physiology
* Allergy to lidocaine or Afrin
* Claustrophobia
* Alcohol consumption within 24 hours of PSG
18 Years
79 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Andrew Wellman
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David A Wellman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham & Womens Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Landry SA, Joosten SA, Sands SA, White DP, Malhotra A, Wellman A, Hamilton GS, Edwards BA. Response to a combination of oxygen and a hypnotic as treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea is predicted by a patient's therapeutic CPAP requirement. Respirology. 2017 Aug;22(6):1219-1224. doi: 10.1111/resp.13044. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
Edwards BA, Sands SA, Owens RL, Eckert DJ, Landry S, White DP, Malhotra A, Wellman A. The Combination of Supplemental Oxygen and a Hypnotic Markedly Improves Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with a Mild to Moderate Upper Airway Collapsibility. Sleep. 2016 Nov 1;39(11):1973-1983. doi: 10.5665/sleep.6226.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BWH-2012P000956
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.