An Efficacy and Safety Study of Golimumab in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis

NCT ID: NCT00488774

Last Updated: 2013-06-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

291 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-08-31

Study Completion Date

2009-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects (good and bad) of golimumab (CNTO 148) therapy in participants with active ulcerative colitis (UC) (sores in the colon).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized (study medication assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the Physician nor the participant know about the study medication), placebo-controlled (an inactive substance; a pretend treatment \[with no drug in it\] that is compared in a clinical trial with a drug to test if the drug has a real effect), parallel-group (a medical research study comparing the response in 2 or more groups of participants receiving different interventions \[treatments\]) study to evaluate an appropriate intravenous (through a vein in the arm) golimumab induction dose and to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of intravenous induction dosing with golimumab in participants with moderately to severely active UC. At Week 6, participants will be asked to participate in an additional 1-year maintenance study. Participants not entering the 1-year golimumab maintenance study will be evaluated for safety at Week 16. The duration of study will be 6 weeks for participants who enter the 1-year golimumab maintenance study and 16 weeks for participant who do not enter the 1-year golimumab maintenance study.There are 2 parts in this study. Part 1 is Phase 2 "dose-ranging" portion of study. Participants enrolled in Part 1, will receive a single intravenous infusion of either matching placebo for golimumab or 1 milligram (mg) per kilogram(kg), 2 mg per kg or 4 mg per kg of golimumab. Part 2 of the study is called "dose-confirming" and newly enrolled participants will receive same doses studied in Part 1, until the doses for Part 2 are selected and Phase 3 begins. At the time that the final doses are selected, all newly enrolled participants will receive 1 of the selected doses or matching placebo; this is the start of the Phase 3 portion of the study. Participants will primarily be assessed using Mayo Score (it is a score developed for measuring disease activity). Participants' safety and quality of life will also be monitored throughout the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colitis, Ulcerative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Matching placebo for golimumab, intravenous (IV) (through a vein in the arm) infusion administered at Week 0

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Matching placebo for golimumab, intravenous infusion administered at Week 0

Golimumab 1 milligram (mg) per kilogram (kg)

Golimumab 1 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Golimumab 1 mg per kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Golimumab 1 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0

Golimumab 2 mg per kg

Golimumab 2 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Golimumab 2 mg per kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Golimumab 2 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0

Golimumab 4 mg per kg

Golimumab 4 mg per kg, intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Golimumab 4 mg per kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Golimumab 4 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo

Matching placebo for golimumab, intravenous infusion administered at Week 0

Intervention Type OTHER

Golimumab 1 mg per kg

Golimumab 1 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0

Intervention Type DRUG

Golimumab 2 mg per kg

Golimumab 2 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0

Intervention Type DRUG

Golimumab 4 mg per kg

Golimumab 4 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CNTO 148 CNTO 148

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants diagnosed with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) defined by a Mayo score of 6 to 12 inclusive at Baseline (Week 0), including an endoscopic (examination of an internal part of the body with a lighted tube; looking at a part of the body with a lighted tube) subscore of greater than or equal to 2
* Participants must have biopsy results (collected at the screening endoscopy (procedure or obtained within the last year) consistent with the diagnosis of UC
* Participants either currently receiving treatment with, or have a history of failure to respond to, or tolerate, at least 1 of the following therapies: oral 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASAs), oral corticosteroids, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and azathioprine (AZA)
* Participants with current dependency or with a history of corticosteroid dependency (i.e. an inability to successfully taper corticosteroids without a return of the symptoms of UC) - Not have a diagnosis of active TB

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants with previous exposure to biologic anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents
* Participants with severe extensive UC that is likely to require a colectomy (surgery to remove part or all of the colon) within 12 weeks of study entry
* Participants having UC limited to the rectum only or to less than 20 centimeter (cm) of the colon
* Presence of a stoma (an artificial permanent opening especially in the abdominal wall made in surgical procedures) or presence of a fistula
* Participants with a history of extensive colonic resection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Dodge, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Laurel, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Dearborn, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mexico, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

Huntington, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Kinston, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Christiansburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Brisbane, , Australia

Site Status

Malvern, , Australia

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Hamburg, City state of Hamburg, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Békéscsaba, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyõr, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyulai Ut 18, , Hungary

Site Status

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Szombathely, , Hungary

Site Status

Hyderabad Andh Prad, , India

Site Status

Jaipur, , India

Site Status

Lucknow, , India

Site Status

Ludhiana, , India

Site Status

Pune, , India

Site Status

Afula, , Israel

Site Status

Hedera, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Šiauliai, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius LT, , Lithuania

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hastings, , New Zealand

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Częstochowa, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Skierniewice, , Poland

Site Status

Sopot, , Poland

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ivano, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vynnytsya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Bulgaria Canada France Germany Hungary India Israel Latvia Lithuania Netherlands New Zealand Poland Romania Russia Serbia Slovakia Sweden Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Adedokun OJ, Xu Z, Liao S, Strauss R, Reinisch W, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ. Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Modeling of Golimumab in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Ther. 2020 Jan;42(1):157-174.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.11.010. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31982148 (View on PubMed)

Rutgeerts P, Feagan BG, Marano CW, Padgett L, Strauss R, Johanns J, Adedokun OJ, Guzzo C, Zhang H, Colombel JF, Reinisch W, Gibson PR, Sandborn WJ; PURSUIT-IV study group. Randomised clinical trial: a placebo-controlled study of intravenous golimumab induction therapy for ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Sep;42(5):504-14. doi: 10.1111/apt.13291. Epub 2015 Jun 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26119226 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C0524T16

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2006-003397-94

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR014188

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT01842152

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.