Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair With Elastomeric Pain Pump
NCT ID: NCT00472134
Last Updated: 2015-06-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-12-31
2007-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* reducing postoperative pain from this procedure
* decreasing length of hospital stay
* reducing or eliminating amount of post-operative narcotics used
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Exparel vs. Bupivacaine Hydrochloride vs. Placebo for Hernia Repair
NCT03541941
Post-Operative Pain Control Using Direct Continuous Bupivacaine Infusion After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT00695240
The Analgesic Efficacy of Two Bupivacaine Concentrations for Combined Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerve Block in Postherniorrhaphy Pain
NCT05687981
Comparison of Local Anesthetic Infusion Pump Versus Depofoam Bupivacaine for Pain Management
NCT04284930
Systemic Lidocaine Infusion for Pain Control in Ventral Hernia
NCT03484650
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias is rapidly evolving with patient and surgeon interest in less morbid herniorrhaphies and the appeal of minimally invasive surgery. The technique is based on the open, preperitoneal repair described by Rives and Stoppa. The placement of a large mesh in the preperitoneal location allows for an even distribution of forces along the surface area of the mesh, which may account for the strength of the repair and the decreased recurrence rates associated with it. The minimally invasive approach embraces the concept that a retromuscular mesh repair may be more durable, although the mesh is placed one layer deeper on an intact peritoneum in comparison to the open technique. The technique incorporates other fundamental components of the open repair such as wide mesh overlap of the defect and the use of transabdominal fixation sutures and spiral tacks to secure the mesh.
While the laparoscopic approach to ventral hernia repair has been documented as safe and effective, with low recurrence rates and minimal patient morbidity, some patients complain of significant post-operative pain for up to 1-3 months after surgery. The exact cause of this postoperative discomfort has not been clearly elucidated. Several hypotheses exist. Some feel that the extensive adhesiolysis required for incisional hernia repair causes significant peritoneal irritation that is exacerbated with the placement of intraperitoneal mesh. Others implicate the spiral tacks placed through the mesh into the peritoneum as sources of persistent discomfort. While others feel that the transabdominal fixation sutures are the localizing site for the accompanying postoperative pain. Transabdominal suture site pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is not uncommon, and occurred in 23% of patients in one series.8 The transabdominal fixation suture sites are those incisions where sutures are placed to secure the mesh placed during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair to the anterior abdominal wall. The sutures are placed in a "clockwise" manner approximately every 4 to 5 cm at the periphery of the mesh as well as 5 mm spiral tacks to hold it in place until fibrocollagenous ingrowth secures the mesh to the abdominal wall. This persistent abdominal pain has been documented as a minor long-term complication resulting from laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, but it can be troublesome for patients in the immediate postoperative period.
The most effective method for managing this postoperative pain has not been defined.
The goal of postoperative care is to minimize the amount of pain a patient experiences following surgery and to help the patient make a quick recovery that leads to a shorter hospital stay free of complications and an earlier return to self-reliance. The most common treatment for pain after operation is opioid analgesic drug administration. Opioids are associated with undesirable side effects such as respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, itching, increased duration of postoperative ileus, and delay in discharge. These side effects can be decreased with a reduction in the amount of opioid drugs utilized. Additionally, systemic narcotics may not optimize pain management in a specific region of the body because of its centralized effect. This may lead to a decreased mentation, reduced mobility, and a slower return to normal activities. Because a reduction of the daily consumption of narcotics is often associated with a decrease in analgesia, many other treatments for postoperative pain have been evaluated. For example, epidural analgesia is effective but the catheter needs to be placed preoperatively, is fairly invasive method, and the maintenance of the epidural treatment can be time consuming and expensive. Many studies have found clinical pain management benefits to the use of local analgesia, as measured by the use of less post-operative pain medication and more favorable ratings on pain intensity scales. Recently, a new method of delivering continuous wound infiltration with a solution of local anesthetic through an indwelling irrigation apparatus has been used in an attempt to reduce early postoperative discomfort in patients after thoracotomy, donor nephrectomy, and open inguinal hernia repair. These prospective randomized double blind studies universally report decreased postoperative discomfort and limited usage of opioids with the usage of these novel catheters.
In this study, the goal is to minimize postoperative pain so that post-operative narcotic requirements will be unnecessary or required less frequently. The infusion of a local anesthetic immediately following the surgical procedure is intended to allow the body tissues to react more favorably to surgical stress and reduce early postoperative pain.
The primary hypothesis is that continuous infusion of a local anesthetic along the edges of the mesh near the transabdominal fixation sutures and spiral tacks placed to secure mesh to the anterior abdominal wall will both subjectively and objectively improve postoperative pain control following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. A secondary hypothesis is that pulmonary function and bowel function postoperatively will recover faster with the use of a continuous infusion of local anesthetic.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bupivicaine via Elastomeric pump
Bupivicaine via elastomeric pump
bupivacaine
administered locally, 0.5% Bupivacaine (Marcaine Abbott Laboratories) or saline administered continuously for 48 hours at 2 mL/h.
Placebo via elastomeric pump
Placebo via elastomeric pump
On-Q PainBuster pump
local anesthetic (bupivacaine) administered via a pain relief system consisting of a 20 gauge soaker catheter attached to an elastomeric balloon pump that is capable of infusing a set volume of local anesthetic over a wide area of surgical site for 2 to 5 days
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
bupivacaine
administered locally, 0.5% Bupivacaine (Marcaine Abbott Laboratories) or saline administered continuously for 48 hours at 2 mL/h.
On-Q PainBuster pump
local anesthetic (bupivacaine) administered via a pain relief system consisting of a 20 gauge soaker catheter attached to an elastomeric balloon pump that is capable of infusing a set volume of local anesthetic over a wide area of surgical site for 2 to 5 days
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Consent obtained
Exclusion Criteria
* Allergic to Bupivacaine
* significant liver or renal disease
* Contraindication to PCA
* Current daily opioid usage
* History of substance abuse disorders
* Dx of chronic pain syndrome
* Daily usage of NSAIDs or COX 2 inhibitors
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael J. Rosen, MD.
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael J. Rosen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11-05-22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.