Metvix Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) Versus Cryotherapy in Participants With Primary Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma
NCT ID: NCT00469417
Last Updated: 2024-08-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1999-10-18
2005-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Secondary objectives was to compare cosmetic outcome and tolerability (adverse events) in these participants, 3 months after treatment. In addition the recurrence rates in the two treatment groups will be compared up to five years after treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Metvix Cream 160 mg/g Versus PDT With Placebo Cream in Participants With Primary Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma
NCT00472108
PDT With Metvix 160 mg/g Cream Versus PDT With Placebo Cream in Participants With Primary Nodular Basal Call Carcinoma
NCT00472043
Compassionate Use of Metvix® (Methyl Aminolevulinate) Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) in Subjects With Field Actinic Keratoses, Large/Multiple Superficial Basal Cell Carcinomas (BCCs), or Bowen's Disease
NCT00535080
Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Metvix® 160 Milligrams/Gram Cream in Organ Transplant Participants With Non-melanoma Skin Cancer
NCT00472459
Intra-individual Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Metvix® Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Conventional Metvix® Photodynamic Therapy in Subject With Mild Actinic Keratoses
NCT01475071
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The use of PDT was attractive for the treatment of BCCs because of its efficiency, mild and local side effects and excellent cosmetic outcome. Previous clinical experience was promising and participants with primary BCCs were included in this prospective, randomised, comparative, multicenter study to show that Metvix is non-inferior to alternative treatment with better cosmetic outcome.
The primary end-point is the number of participants in whom 75% or more of the BCC lesions have responded completely at 3 months after PDT with Metvix or 3 months after cryotherapy. Both on-site and independent, blinded response assessments analysed. The analysis based on the results of the independent review board constitutes the primary analysis.
The secondary end-points was the proportion of participants in whom less than 75% of the BCC lesions respond completely, number of lesions across participants that show complete response, evaluation of cosmetic outcome and adverse events 3 months after Metvix PDT or 3 months after cryotherapy. In addition 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months recurrence rates was assessed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Metvix® PDT
Participants with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions were administered to photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Metvix® cream 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) applied for three hours, followed by illumination using non-coherent light with a fluency of 75 Joule per centimeter square (J/cm\*2) and fluency rate of 70-200 milliwatt per centimeter square (mW/cm\*2) up to 13 weeks.
Metvix® cream
Cryotherapy
Cryotherapy was performed with a hand-held liquid nitrogen spray, using a double freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial icefield formation with a 3 millimeter (mm) rim of clinically healthy tissue, the icefield was to be maintained for a minimum of 20 seconds. This procedure was repeated after a thaw of 2-3 times the freeze time up to 12 weeks.
Hand held liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Metvix® cream
Hand held liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* histologically confirmed diagnosis of primary superficial BCC lesion(s)
* BCC lesions suitable for cryotherapy
* males or females above 18 years of age
* written informed consent. In accordance with Amendment 2 (local amendment), only participant above 19 years of age were to be included in Austria.
Exclusion Criteria
* prior treatment of the BCC lesion(s)
* participant with more than 10 eligible BCC lesions
* a superficial BCC lesion with the largest diameter exceeding 15 mm on face/scalp, larger than 20 mm on extremities and neck and larger than 30 mm on the trunk
* a superficial BCC lesion with the largest diameter smaller than 6 mm
* participant with porphyria
* participant with Gorlin's syndrome
* pigmented superficial BCC lesion(s)
* morpheaform lesion(s)
* infiltrating lesion(s)
* participants with a history of arsenic exposure
* known allergy to Metvix®, a similar PDT compound or excipients of the cream
* participation in other clinical studies either concurrently or within the last 30 days
* pregnant or breast-feeding; all women of child-bearing potential had to document a negative pregnancy test and use the pill or intrauterine device during the treatments and for at least one month thereafter
* conditions associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance.
* xeroderma pigmentosum lesion
* concurrent use of immunosuppressive medication.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Galderma R&D
INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicole Basset-Séguin, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Graz
Graz, , Austria
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
Leuven, , Belgium
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Helsinki, , Finland
Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite
Marseille, , France
Service de Dermatologie, C.H.U Saint Louis
Paris, , France
Spedali di Brescia
Brescia, , Italy
Länsjukhuset Ryhov
Jönköping, , Sweden
Universitetssjukhuset
Linköping, , Sweden
Regionsjukhuset i Örebro
Örebro, , Sweden
Huddinge Sjukhus
Stockholm, , Sweden
University of Wales
Cardiff, , United Kingdom
Ninewells Hospital
Dundee, , United Kingdom
Falkirk and District Royal Infirmary
Falkirk, , United Kingdom
Glasgow University Hospital
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PC T304/99
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.