Trial Outcomes & Findings for Metvix Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) Versus Cryotherapy in Participants With Primary Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma (NCT NCT00469417)
NCT ID: NCT00469417
Last Updated: 2024-08-19
Results Overview
Patient Complete Response (CR) was defined as 100 percentage of the lesions within the participant having negative findings for nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in the histological examination.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
120 participants
3 months after last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy cycle, up to 6 months
2024-08-19
Participant Flow
A total of 120 participants were randomized, of which 118 were received the study treatment. The study was carried out in 13 centers in seven European countries, they were included (Sweden, Finland, United Kingdom, Austria, France, Belgium and Italy).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Metvix® PDT
Participants with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions were administered to photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Metvix® cream 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) applied for three hours, followed by illumination using non-coherent light with a fluency of 75 Joule per centimeter square (J/cm\*2) and fluency rate of 70-200 milliwatt per centimeter square (mW/cm\*2) up to 13 weeks.
|
Cryotherapy
Cryotherapy was performed with a hand-held liquid nitrogen spray, using a double freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial icefield formation with a 3 millimeter (mm) rim of clinically healthy tissue, the icefield was to be maintained for a minimum of 20 seconds. This procedure was repeated after a thaw of 2-3 times the freeze time up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
62
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
60
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
32
|
41
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
30
|
17
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Metvix® PDT
Participants with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions were administered to photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Metvix® cream 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) applied for three hours, followed by illumination using non-coherent light with a fluency of 75 Joule per centimeter square (J/cm\*2) and fluency rate of 70-200 milliwatt per centimeter square (mW/cm\*2) up to 13 weeks.
|
Cryotherapy
Cryotherapy was performed with a hand-held liquid nitrogen spray, using a double freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial icefield formation with a 3 millimeter (mm) rim of clinically healthy tissue, the icefield was to be maintained for a minimum of 20 seconds. This procedure was repeated after a thaw of 2-3 times the freeze time up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Treatment failure all lesions
|
18
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
Consent withdrawn
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
8
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Intercurrent disease
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized but not treated
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Metvix Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) Versus Cryotherapy in Participants With Primary Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Metvix® PDT
n=60 Participants
Participants with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions were administered to photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Metvix® cream 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) applied for three hours, followed by illumination using non-coherent light with a fluency of 75 Joule per centimeter square (J/cm\*2) and fluency rate of 70-200 milliwatt per centimeter square (mW/cm\*2) up to 13 weeks.
|
Cryotherapy
n=58 Participants
Cryotherapy was performed with a hand-held liquid nitrogen spray, using a double freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial icefield formation with a 3 millimeter (mm) rim of clinically healthy tissue, the icefield was to be maintained for a minimum of 20 seconds. This procedure was repeated after a thaw of 2-3 times the freeze time up to 12 weeks.
|
Total
n=118 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=5 Participants
|
64 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=7 Participants
|
64 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
118 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months after last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy cycle, up to 6 monthsPopulation: Intent-to-treat analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Patient Complete Response (CR) was defined as 100 percentage of the lesions within the participant having negative findings for nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in the histological examination.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Metvix® PDT
n=60 Participants
Participants with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions were administered to photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Metvix® cream 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) applied for three hours, followed by illumination using non-coherent light with a fluency of 75 Joule per centimeter square (J/cm\*2) and fluency rate of 70-200 milliwatt per centimeter square (mW/cm\*2) up to 13 weeks.
|
Cryotherapy
n=58 Participants
Cryotherapy was performed with a hand-held liquid nitrogen spray, using a double freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial icefield formation with a 3 millimeter (mm) rim of clinically healthy tissue, the icefield was to be maintained for a minimum of 20 seconds. This procedure was repeated after a thaw of 2-3 times the freeze time up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Histologically Confirmed Patient Complete Response (CR) 3 Months After Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
|
92 percentage of participants
|
90 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months after last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy cycle, up to 6 monthsPopulation: Intent-to-treat analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Complete response was defined as no clinically visible BCC lesions in the treatment area.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Metvix® PDT
n=114 lesion
Participants with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions were administered to photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Metvix® cream 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) applied for three hours, followed by illumination using non-coherent light with a fluency of 75 Joule per centimeter square (J/cm\*2) and fluency rate of 70-200 milliwatt per centimeter square (mW/cm\*2) up to 13 weeks.
|
Cryotherapy
n=105 lesion
Cryotherapy was performed with a hand-held liquid nitrogen spray, using a double freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial icefield formation with a 3 millimeter (mm) rim of clinically healthy tissue, the icefield was to be maintained for a minimum of 20 seconds. This procedure was repeated after a thaw of 2-3 times the freeze time up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Lesion With Complete Response 3 Months After Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
|
109 lesion
|
94 lesion
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months after the last metvix PDT or Cryotherapy cycle (Up to 6 months)Population: Intent-to-treat analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here overall "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Cosmetic outcome was assessed by both investigator and participants in participants with 100% of lesions in complete response. Overall cosmetic outcome was assessed with regard to occurrence of the following signs or symptoms; scarring, atrophy, induration, redness or change in pigmentation. The investigator graded the cosmetic outcome as: * excellent: no scarring, atrophy or induration, and no or slight occurrence of redness or change in pigmentation compared lo adjacent skin * good: no scarring, atrophy or induration but moderate redness or change in pigmentation compared to adjacent skin * fair: slight to moderate occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration * poor: extensive occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Metvix® PDT
n=53 Participants
Participants with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions were administered to photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Metvix® cream 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) applied for three hours, followed by illumination using non-coherent light with a fluency of 75 Joule per centimeter square (J/cm\*2) and fluency rate of 70-200 milliwatt per centimeter square (mW/cm\*2) up to 13 weeks.
|
Cryotherapy
n=50 Participants
Cryotherapy was performed with a hand-held liquid nitrogen spray, using a double freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial icefield formation with a 3 millimeter (mm) rim of clinically healthy tissue, the icefield was to be maintained for a minimum of 20 seconds. This procedure was repeated after a thaw of 2-3 times the freeze time up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 3 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Investigator: Excellent
|
17 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 3 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Investigator: Good
|
30 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 3 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Investigator: Fair
|
6 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months after the last metvix PDT or Cryotherapy cycle (Up to 6 months)Population: Intent-to-treat analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here overall "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Cosmetic outcome was assessed by both investigator and participants in participants with 100% of lesions in complete response. Overall cosmetic outcome was assessed with regard to occurrence of the following signs or symptoms; scarring, atrophy, induration, redness or change in pigmentation. The participants graded the cosmetic outcome as: * excellent: no scarring, atrophy or induration, and no or slight occurrence of redness or change in pigmentation compared lo adjacent skin * good: no scarring, atrophy or induration but moderate redness or change in pigmentation compared to adjacent skin * fair: slight to moderate occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration * poor: extensive occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Metvix® PDT
n=46 Participants
Participants with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions were administered to photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Metvix® cream 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) applied for three hours, followed by illumination using non-coherent light with a fluency of 75 Joule per centimeter square (J/cm\*2) and fluency rate of 70-200 milliwatt per centimeter square (mW/cm\*2) up to 13 weeks.
|
Cryotherapy
n=44 Participants
Cryotherapy was performed with a hand-held liquid nitrogen spray, using a double freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial icefield formation with a 3 millimeter (mm) rim of clinically healthy tissue, the icefield was to be maintained for a minimum of 20 seconds. This procedure was repeated after a thaw of 2-3 times the freeze time up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Participants 3 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Participants: Excellent
|
22 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Participants 3 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Participants: Good
|
24 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Participants 3 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Participants: Fair
|
0 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after last Metvix PDT cycle or Cryotherapy (Up to 5 years)Population: Intent-to-treat analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here "overall number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Recurrence rate in complete clearance group was analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Metvix® PDT
n=109 lesion
Participants with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions were administered to photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Metvix® cream 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) applied for three hours, followed by illumination using non-coherent light with a fluency of 75 Joule per centimeter square (J/cm\*2) and fluency rate of 70-200 milliwatt per centimeter square (mW/cm\*2) up to 13 weeks.
|
Cryotherapy
n=94 lesion
Cryotherapy was performed with a hand-held liquid nitrogen spray, using a double freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial icefield formation with a 3 millimeter (mm) rim of clinically healthy tissue, the icefield was to be maintained for a minimum of 20 seconds. This procedure was repeated after a thaw of 2-3 times the freeze time up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Recurrence Rate in Complete Clearance Group
36 months
|
23 lesion
|
18 lesion
|
|
Recurrence Rate in Complete Clearance Group
48 months
|
23 lesion
|
18 lesion
|
|
Recurrence Rate in Complete Clearance Group
60 months
|
23 lesion
|
19 lesion
|
|
Recurrence Rate in Complete Clearance Group
12 months
|
10 lesion
|
12 lesion
|
|
Recurrence Rate in Complete Clearance Group
24 months
|
18 lesion
|
18 lesion
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT Cycle (Up to 5 years)Population: Intent-to-treat analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here overall "Number of participants analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. "Number analyzed", signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at the specified time point.
Cosmetic outcome was assessed by both investigator and participants in participants with 100% of lesions in complete response. Overall cosmetic outcome was assessed with regard to occurrence of the following signs or symptoms; scarring, atrophy, induration, redness or change in pigmentation. The investigator graded the cosmetic outcome as: * excellent: no scarring, atrophy or induration, and no or slight occurrence of redness or change in pigmentation compared lo adjacent skin * good: no scarring, atrophy or induration but moderate redness or change in pigmentation compared to adjacent skin * fair: slight to moderate occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration * poor: extensive occurrence of scarring, atrophy or induration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Metvix® PDT
n=36 Participants
Participants with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions were administered to photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Metvix® cream 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) applied for three hours, followed by illumination using non-coherent light with a fluency of 75 Joule per centimeter square (J/cm\*2) and fluency rate of 70-200 milliwatt per centimeter square (mW/cm\*2) up to 13 weeks.
|
Cryotherapy
n=43 Participants
Cryotherapy was performed with a hand-held liquid nitrogen spray, using a double freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial icefield formation with a 3 millimeter (mm) rim of clinically healthy tissue, the icefield was to be maintained for a minimum of 20 seconds. This procedure was repeated after a thaw of 2-3 times the freeze time up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Excellent: At month 24
|
19 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Good: At month 24
|
12 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Fair: At month 24
|
3 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Excellent: At month 36
|
20 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Good: At month 36
|
12 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Fair: At month 36
|
4 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Poor: At month 36
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Excellent: At month 48
|
19 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Good: At month 48
|
10 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Fair: At month 48
|
4 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Poor: At month 48
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Excellent: At month 60
|
18 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Good: At month 60
|
8 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Fair: At month 60
|
6 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Overall Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Investigator 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months After the Last Metvix PDT or Cryotherapy Cycle
Poor: At month 60
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Metvix® PDT
Cryotherapy
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Metvix® PDT
n=60 participants at risk
Participants with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions were administered to photodynamic therapy (PDT) with Metvix® cream 160 milligrams per gram (mg/g) applied for three hours, followed by illumination using non-coherent light with a fluency of 75 Joule per centimeter square (J/cm\*2) and fluency rate of 70-200 milliwatt per centimeter square (mW/cm\*2) up to 13 weeks.
|
Cryotherapy
n=58 participants at risk
Cryotherapy was performed with a hand-held liquid nitrogen spray, using a double freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial icefield formation with a 3 millimeter (mm) rim of clinically healthy tissue, the icefield was to be maintained for a minimum of 20 seconds. This procedure was repeated after a thaw of 2-3 times the freeze time up to 12 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
0.00%
0/58 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic cancer
|
0.00%
0/60 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
1.7%
1/58 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Participant deceased
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
0.00%
0/58 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Death due to myeloma
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
0.00%
0/58 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
0.00%
0/58 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Sudden death
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
0.00%
0/58 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatic cancer
|
1.7%
1/60 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
0.00%
0/58 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung
|
0.00%
0/60 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
1.7%
1/58 • Baseline up to Months 60
Safety analysis set included all the participants enrolled in the study.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place